March 1 – A Midwestern Doctor publishes a lengthy article titled, “What We Now Know About COVID Vaccine Shedding.” The piece is very interesting and worth the time, but if you simply don’t have it, make sure to at least check out the “story at a glance” summary.
March 2 – A study is published in JAMA Open Network titled, “Long COVID and Recovery Among US Adults.” Using data from the 2022 to 2024 National Health Interview Survey, researchers looked at the health outcomes of over 43,000 adults who experienced COVID symptoms three or more months after their acute COVID infection. “Among those infected, the weighted prevalence of LC [long COVID] since the onset of the pandemic declined from 19.7% to 13.7%, while weighted LC recovery rates rose from 51.2% to 59.7%. Female sex, age 35 to 64 years, and low household income were consistently associated with higher odds of LC, while non-Hispanic Asian adults had lower odds. Recovery from LC remained less likely among adults 35 years or older. No consistent differences by sex, race and ethnicity, education, urbanicity, employment status, household income, insurance status, usual source of care, or US region were observed.”
March 5 – According to a survey from the Annenberg Public Policy Center (UPenn), “[t]wo-thirds of Americans (67%) have confidence in career scientists working at U.S. federal health agencies, compared with just 43% confidence in agency leaders overall… About 4 in 10 U.S. adults are confident Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (38%) and Dr. Mehmet Oz (42%), administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, are providing trustworthy information on public health – lower than the confidence people say they had in Dr. Anthony Fauci (54%), former head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, when he was in office… People have greater trust in major health and science associations outside government – such as the American Heart Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Medical Association, and National Academy of Sciences – than in U.S. health agencies… On vaccinating newborns for hepatitis B, Americans say they are more likely to accept the advice of the American Academy of Pediatrics than the CDC by nearly a 4-1 margin… Year over year in February surveys, public trust in the CDC, FDA, and NIH dropped significantly from 2024 (74%-76%), the final year of the Biden administration, to 2025 (67%), the first year of this Trump administration – and fell again, now, in 2026 (60-62%).”
So in the midst of a relentless brainwashing campaign meant to undermine trust in public health officials who are not aligned with the death cult, the propagandists can now draw our attention to a survey showing just that? Wow, I’m flabbergasted… I mean, who could have seen that coming?? Maybe the Annenberg Center should start calling these things “self-fulfilling surveys.”
Before I close out the entry, let’s take a look at the propaganda machine in action as they inform the general public about the new “findings” (which they manufactured):
NBC: “RFK Jr. vowed to restore public trust in health. It’s not working, a new survey suggests”
The Hill: “Trust in CDC, FDA, NIH shrinks: Survey”
The Philly Voice: “Americans trust the CDC less under Donald Trump than they did under Joe Biden, Penn survey shows”
Stat News: “Americans trust Fauci more than RFK Jr.”
Scientific American: “Americans trust federal scientists more than RFK, Jr., poll suggests.”
Medpage Today: “Fauci vs RFK Jr.? Here’s Who Americans Trust for Public Health Advice”
If you’re feeling like I wrote about the results of an anti-RFK/pro-death cult poll exactly one month ago, it’s because I did… Like I said, the lying pig people are relentless.
Update (3/9/26): Not content with just one hit piece, The Hill publishes another titled, “RFK Jr. losing battle to boost trust in public health agencies.” It never ends with these people…
- A study is published in PLOS One titled, “Detection of spike protein in term placentas of COVID-19 vaccinated and/or SARS-CoV-2 infected women.” After analyzing placentas from 106 pregnancies, researchers found spike proteins present in 31 of them (29%), including 37% of vaccinated mothers who had no documented history of a COVID infection during their pregnancy. According to a breakdown article by Nic Hulscher, “[t]hese findings suggest that placental transfer of toxic vaccine materials from the mother to the fetus months to years after vaccination is possible.”
- The Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Education announce they have secured “voluntary commitments from 53 of the nation’s top medical schools across 31 states to require at least 40 hours of nutrition education, or implement a 40-hour competency equivalent, for students starting in the fall of 2026… For schools that preferred a competency-based approach, HHS developed 71 core nutrition competencies to allow for a commitment to 40-hour competency equivalent. The competencies were informed by the 2024 JAMA Consensus Statement [link here], and expanded upon to create additional flexibilities for schools and as a resource… Foundational competencies include identifying nutrient-deficient states, interpreting metabolic biomarkers, the micronutrient contents of foods, pathological states affecting nutrient absorption, forming healthy lifelong dietary patterns for chronic disease patients, and the principles of a balanced diet according to the new Dietary Guidelines for Americans.” I wonder how the propagandists are going to spin this positive development into a negative…
March 6 – Fierce Biotech reports Vinay Prasad will be stepping down from his position as director of the Food and Drug Administration’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) at the end of April. Regarding Prasad’s coming departure, FDA head Marty Makari took to X and wrote in part, “[h]e got a tremendous amount accomplished within his one-year sabbatical from UCSF and will be returning back to his academic home later next month. We will name a successor before his departure.”
In an article titled, “Big Pharma wins again,” Alex Berenson points out how Prasad’s departure is a win for companies like Moderna, writing in part, “[t]his afternoon, following a pressure campaign that included hit pieces from reporters who in better days would have stood with Prasad, Prasad said he would leave the FDA at the end of April. Moderna stock popped in after-hours trading on the news. Shares of Uniqure, another company Prasad recently challenged, rose even more… Now, for his blunt honesty, Prasad has been steamrolled too. He could have tried to work within the system and tried to make incremental change, but that wasn’t his style. For better or worse, he went out with his boots on. Still, Prasad’s departure is a sad reminder of the powerful institutional forces that make American medicine in general and pharmaceuticals in particular so tough to fix.”
Whether Prasad had intended to lead CBER for only a year while on sabbatical from his job at the University of California San Francisco or stay on longer, his departure from the FDA shouldn’t be viewed as a total defeat… According to a related article at Stat News, “Prasad’s center has recently rejected at least five cell and gene therapies that experts believe likely could have received approval under previous FDA officials… One of his first moves upon returning [after being removed for several weeks last July] was to fire the person in charge of vaccine safety and surveillance, installing himself instead. Prasad has pushed at least seven leaders out of their positions. Eight agency officials told [the pharma propagandists at] STAT in October that Prasad had created a work environment that was rife with mistrust and paranoia [note their propagandist language]. During his tenure, Prasad, as a key ally of Makary’s, played a key role in some of the agency’s most important initiatives. He led the committee charged with evaluating drug submissions bestowed with a ‘Commissioner’s National Priority Voucher,’ which guarantees a regulatory decision within one to two months. The role allowed him to weigh in on drug decisions outside his purview as CBER director. He also sought to hold vaccines to a regulatory level that, according to 12 former FDA commissioners, might make it impossible for manufacturers to develop new products. Prasad and top drug regulator Tracy Beth Høeg have wrested control of vaccine surveillance from career staff.”
All of that said, it’s never a good thing when Albert Bourla gets his way…
March 7 – During an appearance on The Real Story with Riley Lewis (One America News), the former president of the Pennsylvania Funeral Directors Association, Chris Calvey Jr., says he has personally observed white fibrous clots in 30-40% of the bodies he has embalmed over the past five years. While Calvey was hesitant to blame the COVID “vaccines” for this new and troubling phenomenon, he called out our federal health agencies for failing to address or even acknowledge the issue. Also see this.
March 8 – Politico publishes a schizophrenic MAHA hit piece titled, “The food industry is done taking RFK Jr.’s abuse.” Author Amanda Chu, Politico’s “health care reporter,” wrote in part, “America’s food-makers have a message for President Donald Trump and Republican lawmakers: You must choose between Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s agenda and ours. Since Trump teamed up with Kennedy to win the 2024 election and made him Health secretary, the GOP’s traditional allies in the food industry have mostly stood down as Kennedy called their products poison and blamed them for chronic disease. They aren’t standing down anymore… Midterm pressures have prompted the Trump administration in recent weeks to recalibrate its messaging on MAHA. On Feb. 18, Trump signed an executive order to boost glyphosate production, a weedkiller that a Kennedy-backed White House report last year linked to cancer. Kennedy has also embarked on a messaging blitz, touting the administration’s new dietary guidelines and drug pricing deals while talking less about his efforts to downsize the vaccine schedule… The food industry’s decision to go public with its concerns could complicate the administration’s plans…
“[HHS Secretary Robert] Kennedy wants to end a rule that has allowed food-makers to add new ingredients to products without regulatory scrutiny and has pushed states to regulate ingredients, leaving a patchwork of rules for manufacturers to comply with… Kennedy’s shown little deference to the food-makers’ concerns and said he thinks the deference policymakers have shown them in the past was a byproduct of the Washington swamp. Last year, for example, he told the House Appropriations Committee he wanted his agencies to research links between food and disease and said government officials had ‘buried’ the data ‘because they didn’t want to offend large industries who are putting these poisons in our food.’ …While economists interviewed by POLITICO said the state patchwork of food rules could raise prices, they cautioned the impact was minimal compared to the Trump administration’s tariff threats and immigration policies…”
So there you have it… While Kennedy’s efforts to reign in the food industry and shift the mindset of Americans towards healthier, unprocessed foods is pretty bad, it’s not nearly as bad as having a secure border and no longer allowing other countries to walk all over us financially… Do these people not realize how absolutely moronic they sound?
Politico’s Tweet about the article… Poison is good for business, RFK not so much.
March 9 – Paul Thacker calls out the Associated Presstitutes for a hit piece they ran against Tracy Beth Hoeg in an article titled, “Associated Press Cannot Explain Bewildering Reporting on FDA’s Tracy Hoeg and Antidepressant Risks.” The disingenuous AP article was accusing Dr. Hoeg, who is the director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, of having a conflict of interest because – according to the Presstitutes – she “is working to hire a researcher and friend who wants the agency to add new warnings to antidepressants about unproven pregnancy risks.” Oh, the humanity… According to Thacker, a former Senate staffer who once authored a law on conflicts of interest called the Physicians Payments Sunshine Act, working with a friend is not considered a conflict of interest in any context whatsoever, and was told by several senior FDA officials “HHS doesn’t even have a legal definition for what a ‘friend’ is and no government conflict of interest form asks people to identify who their friends are.”
The “friend” in question is Dr. Adam Urato, the head of maternal-fetal medicine at Metro West Medical Center in Massachusetts. In a funny twist, Thacker reached out to Urato for a comment about the AP hit piece and was reminded they had met before… “While working in the Senate, I was invited to give the keynote address at a conference on conflicts of interest in medicine and research hosted at Tufts University. Administrators later withdrew my invitation, causing one of the organizers to resign and creating a minor scandal that made news in the Boston Globe… Some days later, I got a call from a physician who said Tufts organizers chose him to give the keynote speech in my place. I remember him being irate that Tufts had silenced me. He told me he wanted to know exactly what I was going to say, as he was going to give my exact same talk. He then took notes as I explained my speech… I do remember laughing during the conversation at the thought that Tufts administrators were going to hear exactly what I was going to say, although it was coming from the mouth of someone they deemed more acceptable. When I called Urato for this story, I thought it was the first time we had ever communicated. However, he reminded me during our conversation that he was the physician who called me all those years back, angry that Tufts had cancelled my keynote address. And he was the person who gave my talk at Tufts about the importance of conflicts of interest in medicine.” It was nice reading about a reunion like this, especially since these men have teamed up once again to expose the dishonest dirtbags working in the mainstream “news” media… Check out the article for the rest of the details.
- The MAHA Institute holds a roundtable event in Washington D.C. titled, “Massive Epidemic of Vaccine Injury.” Among the speakers were Brian Hooker, Toby Rogers, Del Bigtree, and Nicolas Hulscher. The linked website is very organized and easy to navigate, though the entire five-hour presentation is well worth the time. For a great overview about the ongoing epidemic of vaccine-related injuries see this.
- Former Republican Speaker of the Missouri House of Representatives, John Diehl Jr., is sentenced to 21 months in prison and fined $50K for committing $379K in pandemic fraud between 2020 and 2022.
March 10 – A study is published at Preprints.org titled, “Batch-Dependent Safety Signal: Nationwide Analysis of Suspected Adverse Events Following COVID-19 Vaccination in Germany.” Researchers used publicly available nationwide data from Germany to determine the weekly rates of suspected adverse events (SAEs) per 1000 administered doses of the COVID vaccine over the first 3.5 years it was available. They found the rates of SAEs varied between 2.2 and 22.8 per 1000 over that time period.
“In 2021, 2022, 2023, and the first half of 2024, total numbers of SAEs were 601610, 317453, 55755, and 26608, respectively. Each year, most SAEs occurred in women, and throughout the entire study period, women accounted for about 72% of all SAEs… Overall, about 56% of SAEs occurred within 0–1 day, 82% within 14 days, and 18% more than 14 days after vaccination, a pattern consistent across all vaccine types… SAE rates were exceptionally high immediately after introduction of the vaccines, before falling precipitously during the first quarter of 2021 and remaining low hereafter. Indeed, between weeks 1-4 and 12-16 of 2021, mean SAEs per 1000 administered doses fell from 8.2 to 4.4 (Comirnaty), 11.6 to 7.4 (Spikevax), and 620.9 to 7.4 (Vaxzevria), respectively. At the batch level, the high SAE rates in the initial period (weeks 1-4 of 2021) were associated with a limited number of distinct vaccine batch numbers (n=61, 48, and 9, respectively). As the sharp decline in SAE levelled off (weeks 12-16 of 2021), SAE reports were distributed across more batches (n=99, 35, and 35, respectively), and the average number of administered doses per batch increased from 17,695 to 83,199. Vaccines introduced later (Jcovden [Janssen], Nuvaxovid [Novavax], and VidPrevtyn Beta [Sanofi-Pasteur, GSK]) were used much less intensively but also exhibited a similar pattern of higher initial SAE rates early after rollout…
“This pattern appears difficult to reconcile with non-product-related factors and is suggestive of a batch-dependent safety signal linked to the early vaccine production. Indeed, simple alternative explanations do not appear to adequately account for the observed pattern… While the rapid upscaling of COVID-19 vaccine manufacturing and global implementation of vaccination after emergency use authorization was a remarkable societal achievement, the sum of the current evidence suggests that this exceptional and expedited process may have introduced variability in early commercial vaccine batches, e.g., affecting the amount of intact mRNA, lipid nanoparticles or process-related impurities in the Comirnaty product… Such product nonuniformity may have altered the risk-benefit profile of the agent for recipients and compromised basic principles of informed consent. Furthermore, the apparent lack of timely targeted regulatory action in response to these emergent signals is of concern, and even used under Emergency Use Authorization, changes in vaccine production, whether in scale, manufacturing process, or presentation, require approval from regulatory authorities to ensure product consistency.”
Screenshot taken from the linked study.
March 11 – The US Food and Drug Administration launches a new adverse event tracking platform called the Adverse Event Monitoring System (AEMS). According to the linked press release, “adverse event reports submitted to the FDA for drugs, biologics, vaccines, cosmetics, and animal food can be displayed in a single streamlined dashboard. In the months ahead, all remaining product centers will begin processing adverse event reports in AEMS. The agency will also migrate historical adverse event data to AEMS, decommission certain legacy systems, and roll out enhanced application program interfaces (APIs) and data analytics tools. By the end of May 2026, AEMS will contain real-time adverse event reports for all FDA-regulated products, consistent with meeting agency obligations not to release individually identifiable patient or consumer information. In the past, the agency processed approximately 6 million adverse event reports per year across a patchwork of seven databases, which were expensive and had a poor user interface, making searches difficult. These platforms collectively cost the agency approximately $37 million per year to operate. Given the efficiencies of AEMS, the agency expects to save approximately $120 million over the next five years. The agency also expects the new searchable system to significantly reduce agency FOIA requests for unreleased adverse event reports, given that AEMS will publish reports in real time, rather than quarterly.”
March 12 – A study is published at Preprints.org titled, “Association Between COVID-19 Vaccination and Polymyalgia Rheumatica: A Review and Case Series Report.” According to a breakdown article by Nic Hulscher, one of the paper’s authors, the research team “examined reports from the CDC/FDA Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and detected a striking disproportionate increase in PMR cases following COVID-19 vaccination compared with other vaccines… Polymyalgia rheumatica primarily affects adults over age 50 and can leave patients with crippling shoulder, neck, and hip pain, profound morning stiffness, fatigue, and elevated inflammatory markers. Many patients require long-term corticosteroid therapy to control symptoms…
“We analyzed reports from the CDC/FDA Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) spanning 1990–2026 and identified: 2,227 cases of polymyalgia rheumatica reported after COVID-19 vaccination, 233 cases after influenza vaccination, [and] 526 cases after all other vaccines combined. After adjusting for the duration of vaccine availability, the safety signal became striking. The odds ratio over time (ORt) for PMR following COVID-19 vaccination compared with influenza vaccination was: 69.4. When COVID-19 vaccination was compared with all other vaccines combined, a similarly strong signal persisted: 30.7. For context, regulators define a vaccine safety signal as a disproportionality measure of ≥2. These findings exceed that threshold by more than an order of magnitude, indicating an unusually strong association between COVID-19 vaccination and reports of polymyalgia rheumatica. The extremely large Z-scores – 23 to 27 standard deviations above expected values – indicate that the probability of this signal occurring by chance is extraordinarily small…
“We propose that spike protein exposure may initiate autoimmune pathways capable of producing inflammatory musculoskeletal disease. Possible mechanisms include: [m]olecular mimicry between spike protein and human tissue, activation of Toll-like receptors (TLR7 and TLR9), Th17 immune activation, [and] IL-6 driven inflammatory cascades. These immune disruptions can lead to bursitis, synovitis, and systemic inflammation characteristic of polymyalgia rheumatica… Because PMR primarily affects older adults, it may be misattributed to aging or degenerative disease, potentially masking vaccine-related triggers.”
- Alex Berenson publishes an article at his Substack titled, “The greatest trick Ralph Baric ever played was convincing the world he didn’t exist.” In the piece, and after a synopsis of the events which led to the creation of COVID in the now-infamous Wuhan lab, Berenson points out how “six years after Covid killed millions of people, shut down the world, and led to the greatest infringement of civil liberties in peacetime since modern democracies began, Baric has somehow never had to explain his actions or his work with [Shi] Zhengli and [Peter] Daszak in public. The closest he came was in January 2024, when he spoke in private to Congressional investigators. And the University of North Carolina – a publicly funded, state-run university – has been fighting for years just to keep details of Baric’s unpublished lab work hidden from the public. So far it has succeeded. Why? Why is Baric so protected? No one knows for sure. But we do know that Baric is connected everywhere, from the CIA to Ft. Detrick, where the Army works on deadly viruses. And we know Fauci led efforts to divert attention from the potential that Covid had emerged from Wuhan almost immediately… Six years after Covid first emerged, nearly every bit of evidence we have points in the same direction: the pandemic was a scientific disaster, not a natural one, and American scientists and the National Institutes of Health played a crucial role both in driving it and covering it up. None of this should be forgotten. Yet it has been…” I didn’t forget, Alex.
March 14 – Dr. Joseph Varon, one of the founding members of the Independent Medical Alliance (formerly the FLCCC), has an article published at the Brownstone Institute website titled, “What COVID Policy Did to Doctors Who Refused to Stay Silent.” It’s an excellent review of how “medical freedom – a core value of [the medical] profession – had come under threat” during the COVID pandemic, and a reminder of the severe price he and others had to pay for pushing back against the top-down medical malpractice doctors were being required to carry out all over the western world.
March 16 – Big Pharma strikes back… In an obvious act of judicial overreach, China Joe-appointed judge Brian Murphy issues a preliminary injunction against HHS effectively barring RFK from appointing members to federal advisory committee boards (FACA) including the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). The outrageous move also blocks the recent revision of the childhood immunization schedule (including the ending of universal Hep-B vaccinations for infants) and nullifies any votes taken by the ACIP panel RFK assembled. The decision stems from the lawsuit brought by several major medical organizations back on July 7th, 2025.
In a pathetic victory lap article put out by the pharma lackey dirtbags at the American Academy of Pediatrics, author Melissa Jenco claims their lawsuit “challenges Kennedy’s decision to replace members of ACIP, who advise the [CDC], with people who lack the credentials and required experience. It also challenged the CDC’s January 2026 overhaul of the childhood immunization schedule that drastically reduced the number of routine vaccines for children.” The article continued, “HHS changing the immunization schedule without consulting ACIP is ‘both a technical, procedural failure itself and a strong indication of something more fundamentally problematic: an abandonment of the technical knowledge and expertise embodied by that committee,’ Murphy wrote in his ruling… Murphy also ruled the new makeup of ACIP likely does not comply with federal law on being ‘fairly balanced.’ ‘These findings go beyond “specific appointments” … and instead suggest that the appointment process, in general, and thus the full committee was tainted,’ Murphy wrote. He added that he also would halt all votes taken by those ACIP members. Those include changing COVID-19 vaccine recommendations to shared clinical decision-making, removing the recommendation for a universal birth dose of hepatitis B vaccine and requiring flu vaccine manufacturers to discontinue use of thimerosal. The ACIP meeting scheduled for this week has been postponed.”
It probably isn’t a coincidence the now-postponed ACIP meeting (which was set to take place March 18th and 19th) was going to include – for the first time in its 62-year history – a formal discussion about vaccine injuries.
In his excellent analysis about the injunction, Robert Malone points out how “[t]he court is careful to style its relief as APA stays under 5 U.S.C. sec. 705 rather than nationwide injunctions, a concession to the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Trump v. CASA (2025), in which a 6-3 majority held that federal courts lack authority to issue universal injunctions binding the government’s conduct with respect to non-parties. Trump v. CASA, 606 U.S. __ (2025). Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s majority opinion was unequivocal: ‘Nothing like a universal injunction was available at the founding, or for that matter, for more than a century thereafter. Thus, under the Judiciary Act, federal courts lack authority to issue them.’ The ruling was hailed as a landmark victory for executive authority – and it was. But today’s ruling in AAP v. Kennedy reveals the limits of that victory…
“The functional effect of today’s order is indistinguishable from a nationwide injunction. Staying the January 2026 Memo restores the prior immunization schedule for the entire country, because there is only one schedule. Every American child’s vaccine routine, every insurer’s coverage obligation, and every state Medicaid program’s benefit structure is affected by this order – not just the organizational plaintiffs before the court. This is precisely the dynamic that CASA sought to address. Justice Barrett’s majority opinion emphasized that courts are limited to providing ‘complete relief to the parties before them.’ A stay of a unitary federal policy instrument is not relief limited to the parties – it is universal relief dressed in party-specific language… The government would be well-advised to raise this point aggressively on appeal. The First Circuit and ultimately the Supreme Court should be asked to clarify whether the APA’s sec. 705 stay mechanism can be used to accomplish what CASA prohibits through the injunction mechanism. If the answer is yes, then CASA accomplished very little. The administrative state’s legal allies have already identified the workaround, and today’s ruling shows it in operation.” Also see this.
Unfortunately, the now-former chairman of the ACIP panel assembled by RFK, Dr. Kirk Milhoan, confirmed to the Independent Medical Alliance (IMA) it has been disbanded, and the administration has decided to reconstitute a new committee rather than begin a lengthy appeal process. Dr. Ryan Cole, the head of IMA’s Medical and Scientific Affairs, also issued a statement about this disgraceful turn of events… “This is what happens when Big Pharma’s business model is threatened. They lawyer up. A coalition of industry-funded organizations went judge-shopping and found a willing partner to shut down the first ACIP in decades that dared to ask hard questions about vaccine safety, efficacy, and the conflicts of interest that have plagued this process for years. As a physician and pathologist, I have spent my career following the evidence wherever it leads. The American people deserve a vaccine advisory committee that does the same, one free from industry capture, committed to rigorous science, and accountable to patients, not pharmaceutical balance sheets. The Administration’s decision to reconstitute ACIP is the right move. We look forward to the appointment of a new committee that restores scientific integrity and puts the health of American families first.” For an overview of exactly what kind of a deranged leftist scumbag Judge Murphy really is, as well as what motivated AAP to bring the lawsuit in the first place, see this.
Image: source
March 20 – Eastern Bay reports on a New Zealand doctor named Bernard Conlon who is facing punishment for actions he took during a nine month period in 2021 and 2022. The Professional Conduct Committee (PCC) “alleges Dr Conlon’s conduct – including public comments about the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine, attempts to import ivermectin, advice and treatment provided to patients, and social media posts – amounts to professional misconduct. It says the actions, individually or collectively, could bring discredit to the medical profession… At the centre of the defence is Dr Conlon’s emphasis on informed consent and what he described as his fiduciary duty to patients… He said his actions were guided by his conscience and his interpretation of the Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights, which he believed required him to present patients with a full range of information and options.” The only people bringing discredit to the medical profession are the COVID tyrants and their useful idiots.
March 23 – Chairman of the Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Ron Johnson (R-WI), informs RFK his committee “has uncovered evidence that appears to show yet another instance of the Biden administration’s failure to take immediate action to warn the public about a serious COVID-19 vaccine adverse event. On August 31, 2022, the Food and Drug Administration (‘FDA’) authorized the PfizerBioNTech COVID-19 bivalent booster. By late October 2022, HHS reported that approximately 14.4 million people 12 years and older had received the booster. In November 2022, federal health officials became aware of a statistically significant safety signal for ischemic stroke among individuals age 65 and older following administration of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 bivalent booster… Despite the monthslong persistence of this safety signal in multiple vaccine safety surveillance systems, Biden’s FDA and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (‘CDC’) did not issue any formal health alerts, nor did they advise the public to avoid the vaccine. Instead, federal health officials continued to tell the public the vaccine was safe, but behind closed doors, they initiated multiple studies and statistical analyses – including a so-called ‘Stroke Project’ – to investigate the validity of their assertion…” The 18-page letter contains a full timeline of the China Joe administration’s malfeasance.
March 25 – In what can only be described as a major win for free speech, a consent decree is filed in the case of Missouri v. Biden (formerly Murthy v. Missouri) which will legally restrict the US Surgeon General, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) from pressuring social media companies to censor Americans for the next ten years. For additional background on the case see this and this.
- A study is published in the Journal of Independent Medicine titled, “Minimizing Signal Loss and Optimizing Pharmacovigilance in VAERS [vaccine adverse event reporting system].” According to author Jessica Rose, the VAERS infrastructure is so outdated and poorly maintained that safety signals are being missed. After cleaning up and reassembling the data, Rose discovered safety signals for fetal loss and cardiac arrest which had been there all along, yet were not visible to anyone using the system as it was designed. Also see this.
March 28 – A study is published in Vaccine titled, “Transient elevation of NT-proBNP after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in healthy adults: A longitudinal biomarker analysis.” Researchers “analyzed serum samples collected at multiple time points between April and December 2021 from 83 healthy adult military personnel vaccinated with two doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines… NT-proBNP [a blood biomarker used to diagnose, rule out, or monitor heart failure] levels showed a significant but transient increase, particularly within 14 days after the second vaccine dose… Nearly 49% of participants exhibited a relative increase exceeding 1.5 times their individual baseline… In healthy adults, mRNA COVID-19 vaccination was associated with a short-term, subclinical elevation in NT-proBNP, particularly after the second dose. While not indicative of overt cardiovascular injury, this biomarker response may reflect transient myocardial stress and warrants further research.” It’s quite concerning that half of the healthy adults who took these needless injections experienced measurable cardiac stress.
March 31 – Let’s wrap up the month with a fun one… Yahoo!Life publishes an article from the New York Post with the headline, “Gen-Z employees can’t bear the 9-to-5 grind – so they’re using lunch breaks to nap and cry in bizarre places throughout NYC.” The piece goes on to say in part,“[s]tressed-out young employees across New York City are ditching their work desks for store fitting rooms, movie theaters and even designated ‘nap pods’ in search of a safe place to catch up on sleep, decompress or sneak in a full-blown meltdown – in the middle of the workday… Some young folks have go-to spots where they ‘crash out’ – or, for the uninitiated, have a full-on mental breakdown in Zoomer lingo.” What the hell is going on with young people?