October 1 – Robert Kennedy fires Jeanne Marrazzo, the COVID cult member who had been serving as the Director of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) since her appointment in August of 2023. Marrazzo was placed on permanent leave back in March, but after she filed a whistleblower complaint in September, enough became enough and Kennedy fired her. At the time she was appointed NIAID director, I wrote, “[her appointment] will do nothing to change the culture of corruption at the agency as Marrazzo is a Big Pharma lackey just like her predecessor [The Twerp], and a COVID cult member of the highest order. She not only pushed unscientific masking policies every chance she got, but loved appearing on television throughout the scamdemic to terrorize the general public into complying with whatever idiotic advice the medical community was spewing at the time. Marrazzo also involved herself in suppressing effective COVID treatments like hydroxychloroquine back in 2020 to help pave the way for the COVID clots shots receiving an unjustified emergency use authorization from the FDA. A fish rots from the head, and this witch is rotten.” Marrazzo even went so far as to call doctors who promoted hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID “despicable,” and claimed they were violating their oath.
Unsurprisingly, her firing is being spun as “retaliation” by her lawyers and the fake news media. In a press release published by the Katz Banks Kumin law firm, they claim Marrazzo “blew the whistle on the HHS’s illegal cancellation of several critical research grants, politicization of scientific research, baseless hostility towards vaccinations, and censorship of scientific research” – all of the same deceptive claims made by every other Big Pharma lackey who has been shown the door by Kennedy. Marrazzo’s lawyer, a Democrat hack by the name of Debra Katz, claimed the Trump 2.0 administration “removed [her] for illegal reasons” after she “bravely came forward to warn the public about the risks posed by the Administration’s hostile approach to vaccines and to protect public health research,” while Marrazzo herself claimed “the leaders of HHS and the National Institutes of Health do not share [her] commitment to scientific integrity and public health…” All of these accusations are laughably delusional in my opinion, and 180 degrees from the truth. It never ceases to amaze me how these swamp creatures will lash out and disobey their superiors, then turn around and claim their superiors are creating chaos… Though I guess having a corrupt news media ready and willing to sell your lies helps quite a bit with that. Update (10/16/25): Stat News publishes an article titled, “Former NIH leaders lament ‘constant chaos’ at the agency, and caution it’s not over.” The politically-motivated comment was made by former NIH institute director, Jeremy Berg, who described RFK’s leadership at the Department of Health and Human Services as “constant chaos” during a panel discussion at today’s STAT Summit in Boston, Maskachussetts. It never ends with these people…
The fake news media doing their best to paint the crooked Big Pharma witch as a victim.
Some of Katz’s political contributions… Notice anything? The full list can be seen here.
Katz also raised $29K for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential run. Hat tip to Paul Thacker.
October 2 – According to a Gallup poll, trust in the American media has hit a new low of 28%. Unsurprisingly, a slim majority of Democrats (51%) still expressed having trust in the media, which is likely due to the fact most of them have late-stage Trump Derangement Syndrome and 90% of the “news” media feeds them a steady diet of exactly what they want to hear (lies and hatred). Republican confidence, on the other hand, hit a new low of just 8% having trust in mainstream media, with 62% having “none at all.” What a sad state of affairs.
- In this month’s edition of Death Cult Runs Wild In Canada, LifeSite News publishes an article titled, “Canada is turning its assisted suicide regime into an organ donation supply chain.” The piece states in part, “[o]rgans being harvested from freshly euthanized patients are becoming more common; while this is the first heart transplant, there have already been liver, kidney, and lung transplants, and ‘at least 155 people in Canada have donated their organs and tissues after receiving a doctor-administered lethal injection’ since 2016, although a ‘number of doctors are concerned that some Canadians receiving medical assisted death don’t actually meet Health Canada’s criteria for the procedure,’ [according to the National Post]… Canada has already achieved the dubious distinction of becoming a ‘world leader in ODE – organ donation after euthanasia.’ A Dutch study indicated that of 286 instances of ODE leading up to 2021, 136 instances were Canadian. CIHI data indicates that 235 people have ‘consented to donating their organs’ after being killed by euthanasia, and of 894 euthanized donors, 7 percent had their organs harvested for donation and 5 percent of organ transplants in 2024 used the organs of euthanized Canadians.” Voice of America also reported on this “dubious distinction” back in 2023.
- Former NIH Director Francis Collins addresses more than 1,000 people at Fox Theater in Spokane, Washington. According to the Spokesman-Review, Collins spoke about his (supposed) faith in God, warned against “tribal alliances” in our society, and shared memories about his now-deceased friend, death cult loyalist and depopulation enthusiast Jane Goodall (see January 3, 2023). Isn’t it funny how the same man who once called for a “quick and devastating published takedown” of the Great Barrington Declaration is now advising people to not become involved in “tribal alliances”? What a phony piece of trash.
Collins also led the crowd in a singalong of “Praise the Source of Faith and Learning.” What a nut.
October 6 – The CDC updates “its adult and child immunization schedules to apply individual-based decision-making to COVID-19 vaccination… Unlike the COVID-19 primary series vaccination pioneered by Operation Warp Speed (OWS) that reached an estimated nearly 85% of the U.S. adult population, just 23% of adults followed the CDC’s most recent seasonal booster recommendation according to its National Immunization Survey. The booster shots prompted widespread risk-benefit concerns about their safety and efficacy as the COVID-19 virus became endemic following population-wide immunity acquired during the pandemic and OWS. [The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices] recommendation emphasized that the risk-benefit of vaccination in individuals under age 65 is most favorable for those who are at an increased risk for severe COVID-19 and lowest for individuals who are not at an increased risk… Individual-based decision-making is referred to on the CDC’s immunization schedules as vaccination based on shared clinical decision-making… It means that the clinical decision to vaccinate should be based on patient characteristics that, unlike age, are difficult to incorporate in recommendations, including risk factors for the underlying disease as well as the characteristics of the vaccine itself and the best available evidence of who may benefit from vaccination.” The decision to adopt individual-based decision-making ends the longstanding universal recommendation previously applied to the COVID clot shots.
The press release quotes HHS Deputy Secretary Jim O’Neil as saying, “Informed consent is back. CDC’s 2022 blanket recommendation for perpetual COVID-19 boosters deterred health care providers from talking about the risks and benefits of vaccination for the individual patient or parent. That changes today. I commend the doctors and public health experts of ACIP for educating Americans about important vaccine safety signals. I also thank President Trump for his leadership in making sure we protect children from unintended side effects during routine immunization.” According to the release, “individual-based-decision-making allows for immunization coverage through all payment mechanisms including entitlement programs such as the Medicare, Medicaid, Children’s Health Insurance Program, and the Vaccines for Children Program, as well as insurance plans regulated by the Affordable Care Act.”
- Peter Marks, the former Director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) who resigned in disgrace after being given the choice to leave or be fired back in late March, does what just about every former federal regulator does after leaving government and takes a job in Big Pharma… Marks will be overseeing molecular discovery and infectious diseases at Eli Lilly as the revolving door just keeps spinning.
Image: source
October 7 – Actress Cheryl Hines, the wife of HHS Secretary Robert Kennedy, embarks on a book tour to plug the upcoming release of her memoir “Unscripted.” Speaking with CBS’s Natalie Morales, Hines said she will “never get used to being a political spouse,” and described Kennedy’s recent run for president as “stressful” because he was not receiving Secret Service protection – protection usually provided to candidates for president and vice president, but was denied by Joe Biden’s Secret Service because they wanted him to be murdered he was not considered a “major” candidate. According to Hines, she was asked quite often about whether she was nervous about her husband getting shot like his father and uncle, and admitted this is something she is still concerned about. When asked about her feelings regarding Kennedy’s stance on vaccines, Hines played it safe and said she sees both sides of the issue, and that all opinions have their place. She also described the political “attacks” coming from Kennedy’s own family as “disappointing,” and that she provides RFK with comic relief whenever possible. When asked about how America can “lower the political temperature,” Hines responded just like a normal person would and said, “everyone needs to take a step back, listen to each other, and find that place where it is okay to disagree with somebody,” adding “it’s good to surround yourself with people who don’t think exactly like you, but instead of hating somebody for that, maybe [take] a minute to understand why they think like that.” Interestingly, Hines also said when her husband hopped aboard the Trump Train, he suggested they fake a marital separation to “save her scrutiny,” but she declined because she didn’t understand how it would help.
Update (10/14/25): During an appearance on The View, Hines pushes back against the panel of dimwitted propagandists who regularly host the show. After less than two minutes of pleasantries about her career as an actress, Sara Haines shifts the conversation to how Hines met RFK so the twit brigade can start their misguided assault on her husband’s character – and reality in general. When Hines described her husband as “completely different from anyone [she’d] ever met in her life,” Head Twit Joyless Behar couldn’t help herself and obnoxiously interjected by saying, “that’s for sure.” Taking the barb in stride, Hines laughed and said (while rubbing her hands together), “I know you ladies – I know you love to talk about him.” This prompted the #2 Twit, Sunny Hostin, to commence with her insincere and politically-motivated questions, asking first if she shared any of the concerns ignorant leftists had about Kennedy teaming up with Trump. Hines, who appeared ready to do battle with the dopey leftist dirtbag, said her husband and the President did, in fact, share common goals, citing lower prescription drug costs as an example. After some more pleasantries about Hines and RFK’s political journey, Behar shifts the discussion to vaccines, saying, “but when you say that they are pro-vaccine, it seems as though Bobby and Trump are casting doubt on the efficacy of the vaccine, which makes Americans very nervous. So that’s the problem that we’re having.” After pointing out how the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program has paid out $5.4 billion in settlements since its creation (1988), Hines retorted by saying in part (9:10 mark), “Yes, to vaccines, yes they are important and they are an important part of our healthcare. Can we do better? Can we make them safer? …Can we listen to parents who say my child got the vaccine and changed and stopped hitting markers, stopped developing the way they were developing? Can we listen to people when they say that instead of saying, ‘you’re crazy’”?
A few minutes later the #3 Twit, Whoopi Goldberg (who sometimes comes off as the Head Twit), took the opportunity to point out that RFK is not a doctor and implied he often speaks “not with the best information we can get” [sic]. When asked if this “gives her pause” and if she ever pushes back on her husband’s views, Hines pointed out most former HHS secretaries have not been doctors, and that her husband has spent his entire career suing big corporations over issues related to health. Hostin then jumps back in and arrogantly “respectfully” suggests RFK “is the least qualified Department of Health and Human Services head that we have had in history” – as if she was qualified to make such a determination. As you would expect, Hines pushed back on the ignorant comment and insisted his career has prepared him for the job as he has spent years “studying toxins [and] studying people’s health.” Hostin then doubled down on her attack, reached into her sack of leftist talking points, and claimed Kennedy has “spread a lot of misinformation, a lot of chaos, [and] a lot of confusion” – to which the audience of circus seals gleefully applauded. When it became clear Hines wasn’t going to back down and began to refute the claim her husband spreads misinformation by bringing up COVID, a visibly angry Hostin cut her off by bringing up a claim RFK made about circumcision and autism. Hines, however, held her ground and politely asked the ignorant ideologue if she could finish before explaining (1:40 mark), “When people, Fauci, people were saying when you get the vaccine, you cannot transmit COVID, it will stop COVID, that was disinformation, misinformation.” When the fake Republican on the panel, Alyssa Farah Griffin (also known as the #4 Twit), attempted to explain that away by stating people just didn’t know the facts as COVID was new and that those same people would acknowledge their mistakes now, Hines quickly pointed out that it was her husband who was being censored at the time for questioning those awful decisions. She also got the last word in on Hostin by making it very clear that all of the attacks Hostin spewed about her husband were only her opinion, not facts. Well done, Mrs. Hines.
Update 2 (10/24/25): Cheryl Hines joins Tucker Carlson for a two-hour interview that touches on a wide range of topics. I initially put it on to just check it out, but ended up watching it in its entirety as I found it quite interesting.
Image: source
- Six former surgeon generals have an opinion piece published in the Washington Compost calling for RFK’s resignation. The self-important drama queens wrote in part, “…we are compelled to speak with one voice to say that the actions of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. are endangering the health of the nation. Never before have we issued a joint public warning like this. But the profound, immediate and unprecedented threat that Kennedy’s policies and positions pose to the nation’s health cannot be ignored… Over recent months, we have watched with increasing alarm as the foundations of our nation’s public health system have been undermined. Science and expertise have taken a back seat to ideology and misinformation… Kennedy has spent decades advancing dangerous and discredited claims about vaccines – most notoriously, the thoroughly discredited theory that childhood vaccines cause autism… and he has repeatedly misrepresented the risks of mRNA technology and coronavirus vaccines… Secretary Kennedy is entitled to his views. But he is not entitled to put people’s health at risk [that’s their job]. He has rejected science, misled the public and compromised the health of Americans.” Since I have already dismantled just about every lie and misrepresentation regurgitated in this drivel article throughout this timeline I won’t bother doing it again – but I will say this… cry harder losers.
October 8 – The Alliance of Indigenous Nations (AIN) International Tribunal issues a declaration stating, “the ‘COVID-19 nanoparticle injections’ or ‘mRNA nanoparticle injections’ or ‘COVID-19 injections’ meet the criteria of biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction… This Tribunal finds and hereby declares that the COVID-19 injections, mRNA injections, or mRNA nanoparticle injections, are in fact biological and technological weapons of mass destruction.” The reasons cited by the AIN for their decision include the expert opinions of doctors Ana Maria Mahalcea and the late Francis Boyle, the presence of self-assembling nanotechnology and biosensors in the injections, the indestructible polymer bioplastic blood clots produced in recipients of the injections, the wide range of diseases linked to the injections, the risks the shots pose to the human genome, the presence of SV-40, and the “attempt to fuse synthetic control mechanisms into humans that in effect are simultaneously done without our consent and which have killed countless and maimed others.” The declaration is quite the read to say the least. For some additional background see this.
October 10 – Dr. Sean Barbabella, physician to the president, sends a memorandum to White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt to share news about President Trump “successfully completing” a follow-up evaluation at Walter Reed Medical Center. Sadly, while the “[c]omprehensive laboratory studies performed in conjunction with the visit were exceptional,” Trump went ahead and got himself injected with a seasonal flu vaccine and a COVID booster. Update (10/11/25): Upon hearing the news about Trump receiving another COVID jab, the dishonest cretins working at the online rag known as The Daily Beast couldn’t help themselves and reported, “President Trump got his COVID booster shot Friday night while Robert F. Kennedy Jr., America’s most famous anti-vaxxer and the HHS Secretary, restricts Americans’ access to the vaccine he hates.” Adam Downer, the clown with a very appropriate last name who typed up the moronic propaganda piece, even went so far as to describe the occurrence as Trump “humiliating” RFK in his pathetic headline… You would think these people would eventually grow tired of behaving like such losers, but no, they just seem to get worse.
October 11 – Dr. Peter McCullough publishes an article at the Focal Points Substack about a recent telephone interview (contained in the article) he did with Lauren Weber of the Washington Compost, their new “accountability reporter focused on disinformation.” I’m not sure if her focus will be on debunking disinformation or disseminating it, but if I had to wager on it I’d empty my bank account betting on the latter… During the interview, Weber’s questions “roamed from Casey DeSantis and initiatives for ivermectin in cancer to Spike detoxification to [Dr. McCullough’s] grave concern about the COVID-19 vaccine debacle,” yet despite Weber’s disjointed approach, McCullough’s well-informed takes made it quite interesting to listen to. Update (10/21/25): Weber’s article – which is titled, “How a Joe Rogan-Mel Gibson podcast inspired Florida’s cancer research focus” – is published at the Washington Compost website. While it’s not the most vicious piece I’ve ever read, the motive was clear: discredit many of the most famous doctors who refuse to go along with the medical establishment’s preferred narratives. These individuals include Casey DeSantis, Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo, Dr. Simone Gold, Dr. Paul Marik, and, of course, RFK. McCullough’s name only made an appearance at the very end of the article and it was only to insinuate he and others who promote and sell products pooh-pooh’d by the mainstream medical establishment are only after money. When Weber wasn’t trying to drag these amazing individuals through the mud, she was encouraging cancer patients to just go ahead and die instead of trying the new treatments currently being studied. Needless to say, it was pretty riveting stuff…
- If you are familiar with this website, you likely already know of Nicolas Hulscher, a Master of Public Health who writes a ton of articles at the Focal Points Substack and is involved in medical studies conducted by the McCullough Foundation. Well, it appears Mr. Hulscher has been above the target long enough to start catching flak from the Sanad Verification Agency – an agency which serves as Al Jazeera’s “fact-checker.” Back on September 26th I did a brief write-up about a study out of South Korea which found “the hazard ratios of thyroid, gastric, colorectal, lung, breast and prostate cancers ‘significantly increased at 1 year post-vaccination’ regardless of age, sex or the type of COVID vaccine administered (the increased risk ranged from 20-69%, respectively).” The supposed “fact-checkers” claim Hulscher (as well as other people and news sites written about in this timeline) “omitt[ed] a key phrase” from the study that turned what should be a cause for concern into dreaded “misinformation.” The phrase in question is “epidemiological association without causal relationship,” which does nothing to dissuade me from raising an eyebrow after reading about researchers finding a sharp uptick in seven different types of cancer in millions of people one year after COVID “vaccination.” The phrase debunks nothing, and is akin to researchers offering obligatory support and praise for the COVID jabs in the abstracts of studies which often find problems with the “vaccines” the same way this one did… A note at the top of the study now reads, “Readers are alerted that concerns with this article have been raised with the Editors. Editorial action will be taken as appropriate once the concerns have been fully investigated.” If the issue is those who reported on the study, why would “editorial action” be needed? Check out the hit piece, and then check out Hulscher’s rebuttal so you can decide for yourself who is reporting accurate information.
October 12 – “An Inconvenient Study,” a documentary film about a buried 2020 Henry Ford Health study, is released online. The controversial study, which was conducted by a well-respected mainstream doctor by the name of Marcus Zervos, showed the drastic differences in overall health when unvaccinated children were compared to vaccinated children (data chart below). The film features health journalist Del BigTree and attorney Aaron Siri, among others, and is well worth taking the time to watch. As I mentioned in an update last month, Henry Ford Health immediately issued a cease-and-desist letter to the makers of the film and began “denouncing” the claims made about their study, stating in part, “[the study] was never considered for submission to journals because it did not remotely come close to meeting the rigorous scientific standards the system demands… Claims that Henry Ford Health kept or suppressed the results from the public due to political reasons are patently false, defamatory and troubling…” Baffled by their response, the great Steve Kirsch reached out to Henry Ford Health for clarification (but isn’t expecting a response).
In the film, Dr. Zervos is confronted by Del BigTree (and recorded on hidden camera) about why he wasn’t pushing to get the study published. His answer, while disturbing, was incredibly honest… Zervos told BigTree that while he felt the study’s findings were legitimate and important, he would essentially “be finished” if the results saw the light of day. He also spoke about how he was approached by the Henry Ford PR team – after they slapped a gag order on him – and told his findings would end up being manipulated in the press, and that he would ultimately be discredited and eventually fired. Heeding their warning, Zervos said he did not want to meet the same fate as other doctors who stood up to the medical establishment, and is opting instead to just “finish out [his] work.” He also told BigTree, “Part of my reluctance to do anything is that nothing is going to come out of it other than me losing my job… Publishing one study like this one… it’s actually the right thing to do… but I just don’t wanna.” Zervos also said nothing is going to change unless there is a change in leadership, which we now have, though if you’ve noticed, much of what I’ve been writing about in recent months is the ongoing efforts of the death cult, their minions in government, and the propagandist pigs in the press to destroy RFK and his team every chance they get – and most people do not have their fortitude…
In 2020, another doctor named Paul Thomas published a study which also found unvaccinated children required fewer doctor visits and had much better overall health outcomes. But instead of pursuing his findings, the Oregon Medical Board suspended Thomas’ license just days after the study was published, before the study itself was retracted months later. The medical cartel, like all cartels, does not play games when it comes to upsetting the applecart – especially since the apples being served are poisonous and undoubtedly responsible for an untold amount of death and suffering. Many doctors have faced persecution over the years, even before all the COVID lunacy began, so it’s hard to fault Dr. Zervos for feeling the way he does. Hopefully, after he retires, he will find the courage to begin speaking out alongside the many others who already have.
Update (10/15/25): Over the last few days Kirsch has written several interesting follow-up articles at his Substack about the Henry Ford study, the attempts to discredit it, and his response to those attempts (also see this and this). I would highly recommend checking them out.
Data taken from the 2020 Henry Ford Health System study (pages 17-18).
- Dr. Ah Kahn Syed publishes a great article at their Substack titled, “The Pfizer Job.” The piece details how the Big Pharma giant “carried out the biggest pharma trial heist ever – and the regulators swallowed it hook, line and sinker.” If you’re a regular reader of the site you probably don’t need the history lesson, but chances are you know somebody who does…
The New York Slimes doing their part to promote Pfizer’s garbage “vaccine.”
October 13 – Variety reports actor Rockland Dunbar is set to go to trial tomorrow over his claim he was fired from the TV series “9-1-1” due to his religious beliefs, which prohibited him from getting the COVID clot shot. Disney is arguing Dunbar made up a phony religious excuse to avoid taking the jab, and discovered after conducting their own investigation the actor took other drugs like steroids (for shoulder pain) and synthetic testosterone injections. Dunbar’s lawyers tried to prevent Disney from accessing his medical records by claiming they were irrelevant, but the judge disagreed… which pretty much cooked his goose. Update (10/17/25): A federal jury rules unanimously in favor of Disney. According to Variety, Dunbar told the jury “he believes the vaccine has killed more people than COVID-19, and that the vaccine was made with aborted fetal cells and contains ‘disease.’ He also testified that six foreign objects have been found in the Pfizer vaccine that cannot be identified under a microscope.” Kudos for speaking your mind, Rockland, but defeating the COVID cult in court was never going to be that easy – especially after Disney’s lawyers cited 37 other medications you had no problem taking…
October 15 – In case you were wondering how many states are breaking with the federal government and forming their own “health alliance,” the total is now up to 15. According to a press release from the office of Commiefornia Governor Gavin Nuisance, the new alliance “will strengthen emergency preparedness, improve communication, share data and expertise, and ensure states and territories can respond quickly and consistently to emerging health threats.” My God, these leftists take themselves way too seriously… In reality, this “alliance” will serve as a rubber stamp for Big Pharma, recommending the use of any and all vaccines for children as young as six months old, regardless of whether the disease children are being inoculated against is even a threat to them. In the fantasy world, however, “[t]his announcement comes on the heels of the Trump administration’s dangerous misguidance on vaccine safety and efficacy… The federal government’s failing attempts to ‘Make America Healthy Again’ have left yet another leadership gap in our nation’s health and science efforts. The Governors Public Health Alliance is necessary to bring leaders and experts from across the country together, quickly, to help protect Americans from disease and injury.” Keep in mind, many of the leftist dirtbags who have signed on to this alliance forced their citizens to endure unscientific COVID mitigation measures like mandatory masks, mandatory mRNA “vaccines,” social distancing, and lockdowns… How’d all that turn out? Sad!
October 16 – James Lyons-Weiler publishes an article at his Substack titled, “How to Bias a Study On COVID-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnancy.” The piece analyzes a study published yesterday at JAMA titled, “First-Trimester mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination and Risk of Major Congenital Anomalies,” which Lyons-Weiler found blatantly biased and intentionally flawed… “The researchers looked at over 527,000 live-born infants in France, comparing those whose mothers got an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in the first trimester with those who didn’t… Here’s the problem: They only looked at live births. That means any fetus with a severe enough defect to lead to termination or fetal death is simply not counted. And guess what? The most severe defects – the ones most likely to show up if a vaccine did have a harmful effect – are the ones most likely to lead to termination or stillbirth… They deleted the most relevant cases before the analysis even started.
“We don’t need to guess how big this omission is. France participates in EUROCAT, a European congenital anomaly surveillance system. From their own data: [1] About 8.35 per 1,000 pregnancies end in termination for fetal anomaly. [2] Another 1.11 per 1,000 end in perinatal death with a malformation. That’s 9.46 per 1,000 anomaly-affected pregnancies removed by design. If you want that as a percentage, it’s about 32% of all anomaly-affected pregnancies. So when Bernard et al. say they found no increased risk in their cohort, they’re only looking at the surviving 68% of anomaly cases. That’s like claiming a ship is safe because most of the survivors didn’t drown – without counting the ones who never made it onto the lifeboats.
“Historical precedent makes clear that live-birth-only studies consistently underestimate teratogenic risk. For drugs such as valproate, isotretinoin, and thalidomide, early safety studies that limited analysis to surviving infants failed to detect strong signals of harm. Only when pregnancy registries began systematically including terminations for fetal anomaly (TOPFA) and stillbirths did the full scope of risk become apparent… The WHO and EMA both emphasize the necessity of including prenatal losses in teratogenicity surveillance for precisely this reason. The Bernard et al. study, by analyzing only live births and excluding all pregnancies ending in fetal death or termination, repeats the same early-stage design errors that delayed recognition of harm in past pharmacovigilance failures. The claim that ‘no increased risk’ exists should therefore be interpreted not as evidence of absence, but as a predictable artifact of an exclusionary analytic frame – a frame that, in prior contexts, has allowed dangerous exposures to persist unchallenged for years.” Also see this.
Now might be a good time to again draw your attention to a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) back on June 17, 2021 which revealed an 82% rate of “spontaneous abortion” among women who received the COVID jab in either the first or second trimester of their pregnancy. At the time I wrote in part: “The study’s authors… dishonestly present misleading figures in an attempt to make the ‘vaccine’ appear safer than it actually is. By using the total number of women who participated in the study (827) as the denominator, and the total number of spontaneous abortions that occurred (104) as the numerator, they are able to conclude that 12.6% of the pregnancies ended abruptly after the mother took the ‘vaccine’ – which is horrible in and of itself. The 700 women who received the jab in their third trimester could not technically have a spontaneous abortion because they were already past the 20 week threshold. When you remove them from the equation and use 104 as the numerator (number of spontaneous abortions) and 127 as the denominator (number of women in their first or second trimester) you get a rate of 82%, which is quite alarming.”
A few months later, NEJM offered a “correction” to explain away this horrifying data, but the excuses they made – in addition to being presented poorly and difficult to read – were not very comforting or convincing. For example, the double dagger symbol in the spontaneous abortion row of one of the study’s charts leads you to text which reads in part (screenshot below), “A total of 96 of 104 spontaneous abortions (92.3%) occurred before 13 weeks of gestation. No denominator was available to calculate a risk estimate for spontaneous abortions, because at the time of this report, follow-up through 20 weeks was not yet available for 905 of the 1224 participants vaccinated within 30 days before the first day of the last menstrual period or in the first trimester.” The “correction” page says this information “should have been appended to the double dagger,” but yet it is there now when you link to the original study… So how would we know if the original data ended up being altered in some way to achieve a better result? That aside, 96 “spontaneous abortions” occurring in “1224 participants vaccinated within 30 days before the first day of the last menstrual period or in the first trimester” is still 7.84% – which is still very concerning (and definitely not “safe and effective”). Moreover, why is tallying the number of spontaneous abortions (a pregnancy lost within the first 20 weeks) considered a “risk estimate” when it is the actual rate at which they occurred? I can’t even tell you how frustrating it is to always be wading around in such muddied waters.
Making matters worse, back in April of this year Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) accused Tom Shimabukuro, the CDC doctor in charge of monitoring adverse reactions to the COVID vaccine, of mishandling or even deleting key records from the 2021 NEJM study. In a letter written to Attorney General Pam Bondi, FBI Director Kash Patel, and HHS watchdog Juliet Hodgkins that same month, Johnson wrote in part, “HHS officials recently informed me that Dr. Shimabukuro’s records remain lost and, potentially, removed from HHS’s email system altogether.” Any way you slice it, the COVID saga always seems to go from bad to worse…
Screenshot taken from the linked June 2021 NEJM study.
- Bill Rice Jr. publishes an interesting article at his Substack titled, “The Medical Research Scam.” The somewhat lengthy piece focuses on the University of Alabama at Birmingham, the staggering amount of research grant money the school takes in on a yearly basis, and – perhaps most importantly – what (little) these federal investments have done for the taxpayers who fund them. The article is only about a 5-minute read and well worth the time as it touches on the different elements involved with this funding, and provides insight into how and why reforming the Science/Medical Industrial Complex is so difficult.
- MSDNC airs an interview with Senate leader John Thune in which he throws HHS Secretary RFK Jr. under the bus. When asked by Democrat party propagandist Ali Vitali if the way Kennedy has been talking about Tylenol is “dangerous,” Thune said, “Well, I’ve said that I think that if I were a woman, I’d be talking to my doctor and not taking advice from RFK or any other government bureaucrat for that matter. But I just think that there are subjects and issues on which we have differences of opinion. I typically litigate those privately rather than publicly, but I think there are plenty of examples, and there are lots of times I could point out to you where we have differences of opinion, and I make my voice clear, and in some cases, it results in a change, and sometimes it doesn’t. But I think that’s our job, is to try and present that check and balance. We are a co-equal independent branch of the government.” Not only have RFK, Marty Makari, Jay Bhattacharya and President Trump advised pregnant women and people in general to consult their doctors for medical advice, but the people at Tylenol have as well… But you can always count on a RINO swamp rat like John Thune to help out an MSNBC hack as they continue making something out of nothing.
Dr. Joel gets it.
October 17 – A study out of Taiwan is published in the European Journal of Pharmacology titled, “Applying spectral analysis to the arterial pulse to discriminate cardiovascular side effects following administration of Moderna’s mRNA-1273 vaccine.” According to a breakdown published at the Focal Points Substack, the study found “91% of Moderna mRNA-1273 recipients developed cardiovascular side effects during the observation period – within one week of receiving the Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccine. Using advanced spectral pulse-wave analysis, the researchers detected statistically significant post-vaccine changes in arterial pulse amplitude and phase – patterns consistent with arterial dysfunction and increased vascular stiffness. These were objective, quantifiable changes in how the arteries function – the same alterations seen in hypertension, reduced vascular elasticity, and early endothelial stress… Key findings [included:] 185 of 203 participants (91%) experienced cardiac, vascular, or combined cardiovascular side effects following Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccination, [s]tatistically significant post-vaccination changes in spectral pulse-wave indices (Cn and Pn) were detected in participants reporting cardiac or vascular side effects, [t]hese changes were consistent with increased vascular stiffness and reduced arterial elasticity, indicating altered blood-flow dynamics after Moderna’s mRNA-1273 vaccination, [and no] significant differences were observed between groups before vaccination, confirming the changes appeared after the Moderna shot.” Measurements taken between 4 and 10 days after the injections showed these changes persisted for at least a week. The authors concluded, “Subclinical vascular changes induced by Moderna’s mRNA-1273 vaccine could be effectively detected by noninvasive real-time pulse distribution analysis,” which means even though you may feel okay after taking Moderna’s COVID jab, there could be something going on with your blood vessels that is not okay.
Image: source
October 20 – Steve Kirsch publishes an article at his Substack titled, “Japan CMRR data website shows clear mortality increase caused by the COVID shot.” The article discusses a website put up by a Japanese doctor and city council member named Kenji Fujikawa that uses cumulative mortality rate ratio to show how “each time people get another [COVID] shot, their mortality rate relative to those who didn’t get the extra shot diverges upwards.” As Kirsch points out in his article, “the ratio of cumulative deaths/week is a very legitimate method. Epidemiologists don’t like it because the data shows that they got it all wrong about the COVID shots as you can easily demonstrate for yourself… Every time you compare the two cohorts, the more vaccinated cohort will have mortality even though they tracked at the start. This is not normal. If they track at the start, they should continue to track. If the shots worked, the more vaxxed cohort would exhibit lower mortality, not higher mortality. The shots are doing exactly the opposite of what was promised. They are killing people, not saving their lives.” Over the last several years, Kirsch has dedicated his life to exposing the vaccine scam, and his Substack is definitely worth following.
October 21 – A study is published in BMC Infectious Diseases titled, “Real world effectiveness of antipneumococcal vaccination against pneumonia in adults: a population-based cohort study, Catalonia, 2019.” Researchers analyzed the health results of 2.23 million people ages 50 and up and found recipients of PCV13 (pneumococcal conjugate vaccine) and PPsV23 (23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine) were significantly more likely to be hospitalized and/or die from pneumonia when compared to their unvaccinated counterparts. Ultimately, the study “did not find evidence of the clinical effectiveness of PPsV23/PCV13 vaccination in preventing the outcomes measured at population-based level. At present, new extended-valency PCVs (PCV15/PCV20/PCV21) have been marketed for [use] in adults and, logically, vaccines’ effectiveness must be re-evaluated in the coming years.” So just continue injecting people with these jabs until a “re-evaluation” is completed? For more information, see this.
Image: source
October 22 – During an appearance on Steve Bannon’s War Room, James Lyons-Weiler discusses the fraud taking place within the medical establishment and how medicine is being weaponized against the American people. Lyons-Weiler told Bannon Justice Department attorney Ed Martin was in attendance at the Association of Physicians and Surgeons meeting last month, and while there announced “Secretary Kennedy gave him a list of 28 studies – with the journals and layperson’s summaries – that actually, they were wrongfully retracted, and that those journals have been put on notice by the attorney general’s office.” He also suggested there is an ongoing federal investigation into people believed to have actively participated in efforts to scam the public by making false and/or misleading statements about the dangers associated with certain vaccines. The linked interview segment is only 13 minutes, so check it out.
October 25 – Steven Hatfill, a senior adviser at HHS’s Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response (ASPR) and an outspoken critic of the mRNA COVID jabs, is fired. According to Reuters, the person they spoke to within HHS “cited [Hatfill’s] false claims of being the chief medical officer at ASPR and lack of effective cooperation with government agencies and department leadership as reasons for the ouster… ‘He (Hatfill) was senior advisor, not chief medical advisor or chief medical officer,’ the HHS official said, but did not immediately clarify whether this was related to his dismissal… The Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, a research unit of ASPR that helps companies develop medical supplies to address public health threats, had said in August it would wind down mRNA vaccine development activities… Hatfill appeared on a show hosted by right-wing podcaster Steve Bannon days after the BARDA announcement [see August 7th] and claimed mRNA vaccines caused ‘biochemical havoc’ in cells.”
The Seattle Times had a much different take, reporting Hatfill told them “he was ousted as part of ‘a coup to overthrow Mr. Kennedy’ that he claimed was being organized by Matt Buckham, Kennedy’s chief of staff. But he did not explain why his ouster was evidence of the effort. Hatfill said that Buckham had told him that the secretary wanted ‘to go in a different direction’ and had asked him to resign. Hatfill said that he had refused, and had told Buckham that the department would have to fire him instead. The health department, he added, had printed business cards for him that identified him as a senior adviser and chief medical officer. His spokesperson texted a reporter an image of the business card that showed the title. Buckham could not be reached for comment, but the health department official, speaking on the condition of anonymity to address a personnel matter, said that ‘firing a staff member for cause does not add up to a coup.’”
Update (10/29/25): Nic Hulscher interviews Dr. Steven Hatfill and former Director of MAHA Implementation Gray Delany on his Focal Points podcast. Delany was fired back in August for supposedly “[butting] heads with other officials at [HHS] about how announcements are made” – which, similarly to Hatfill’s ouster, seems a bit bizarre. During the interview, both men described how the people being systematically removed at HHS are the ones doing the most to help Kennedy advance his agenda, which in my opinion sounds an awful lot like a coup (see July 1st). Hatfill also took some time to explain just how dangerous and deadly the mRNA “vaccines” really are, and why they should have never been taken to market, while both provided some great insight about why the MAHA crew is still recommending these jabs for certain groups and the political war taking place inside HHS. The interview is an hour and well worth the time.
October 28 – Bill Gates publishes an article at his website titled, “Three tough truths about climate.” In the piece, Gates finally admits what thinking people have known for some time: climate change is not an existential threat to humanity. He opens the article by writing, “There’s a doomsday view of climate change that goes like this:
“In a few decades, cataclysmic climate change will decimate civilization. The evidence is all around us – just look at all the heat waves and storms caused by rising global temperatures. Nothing matters more than limiting the rise in temperature.
“Fortunately for all of us, this view is wrong. Although climate change will have serious consequences – particularly for people in the poorest countries – it will not lead to humanity’s demise. People will be able to live and thrive in most places on Earth for the foreseeable future. Emissions projections have gone down, and with the right policies and investments, innovation will allow us to drive emissions down much further. Unfortunately, the doomsday outlook is causing much of the climate community to focus too much on near-term emissions goals, and it’s diverting resources from the most effective things we should be doing to improve life in a warming world. It’s not too late to adopt a different view and adjust our strategies for dealing with climate change.”
Don’t get too excited, though, as just a few paragraphs later Gates did his best to pacify the climate crazies by writing (emphasis his), “To be clear: Climate change is a very important problem. It needs to be solved, along with other problems like malaria and malnutrition. Every tenth of a degree of heating that we prevent is hugely beneficial because a stable climate makes it easier to improve people’s lives… COP30 is taking place at a time when it’s especially important to get the most value out of every dollar spent on helping the poorest. The pool of money available to help them – which was already less than 1 percent of rich countries’ budgets at its highest level – is shrinking as rich countries cut their aid budgets and low-income countries are burdened by debt. Even proven efforts like providing lifesaving vaccines for all the world’s children are not being fully funded.”
While I can’t be certain about his motivation for taking a notably different position on an issue he’s been exaggerating and harping on for years, I would imagine it has more to do with the direction the political winds are blowing than anything else. As the world turns toward more right-wing, populist leadership, Gates knows the political will and funding needed to enact bogus climate measures is fading fast. So instead of becoming irrelevant (as irrelevant as a multi-billionaire can be anyway), he will focus his efforts on public health and vaccines, mainly in developing nations, so he can continue to do his part in the culling of humanity. On more than a few occasions while writing this timeline I have pointed out how the COVID cult and the climate cult are two different arms of the same globalist death cult, so in the end it doesn’t matter where the emphasis is – so long as the number of people on earth keeps heading down “pretty near to zero” (Gates said this himself at a 2010 TED Talk – start at the 3:45 mark). Also see this.
Update (11/20/25): A fire breaks out at the “Pavilion of Countries in the Blue Zone” during the COP30 gathering in Brazil – the same gathering loving leftists chopped through thousands of miles of protected rainforest to get to… Thousands of delegates were evacuated and over a dozen were treated for smoke inhalation. The fire will only set the meeting of the climate crazies back a few days, however, as they are set to resume discussions about the nonexistent crisis at the end of the week. Though the source of the fire is currently believed to be electrical, it would have been much more fitting if it had started in a dumpster…
October 31 – The Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) publishes an article at their website titled, “Study suggests mRNA COVID-19 vaccines can improve chances of cancer survival.” The piece discusses a study published in Nature back on the 22nd which found the mRNA COVID jabs could boost the effectiveness of cancer treatments. According to the article, “[t]he vaccinated group had a 3-year overall survival rate of 55.7%, compared with 30.8% in the unvaccinated group – this translates into a 49% reduction in cancer-associated mortality risk.” While this seems like something promising in the fight against cancer, I was a bit concerned about some of the language contained in the discussion section of the study itself, which reads in part, “[t]hese findings define a role for widely available vaccines for enhancing the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy. Although we focus on a single therapeutic due to its wide availability, these data could pave the way for other universal mRNA therapeutics specifically designed to reset patient immune systems for enhanced response to immunotherapy.” Now, I’m no doctor, but why would a younger and/or healthier person want their immune system “reset” if they are trying to protect against a disease with a very high survival rate? Could this be why we saw such a sharp rise in all-cause mortality among working age people in the two years following the rollout of these “vaccines”?