November 1 – Dr. Sherri Tenpenny publishes an article at her Substack titled, “Blanket Informed Consent for Biologics Could Be Deadly.” The piece discusses how the word “vaccine” is being removed from medical jargon and consent forms and replaced with a much more murky term – “biologics.” Tenpenny wrote in part, “Over time, the standard for truly informed consent has quietly been eroded. In many hospitals and clinics, informed consent forms have become little more than a formality: a few checks in digital checkboxes and a scribbled signature on an iPad. These consent forms are often buried within pages of fine print drafted by attorneys, intentionally dense and difficult to read. Even patients who try to understand the language find it nearly impossible to decipher. The forms no longer use plain language. Instead of saying, ‘Do you consent to receive the influenza vaccine or a COVID jab?’, the consent form may now ask if you consent to the use of biologic agents. The assumption is that you, the patient, understand that vaccines are biological agents. This raises the question: Is the confusing change in language intentional?” The article is very informative and worth taking the time to read.
November 2 – Commiefornia Governor Gavin Nuisance sits down with Democrat party propagandist Kristen Welker on NBC’s Meet the Presstitutes and goes on a sociopathic lying spree. When asked by Welker if he still stands by his decision to stick with Joe Biden during the 2024 election cycle (0:30 mark), and if he ever had concerns about his “capacity to serve,” Newsom rambled on about some of Biden’s supposedly successful legislative efforts before admitting his disastrous debate performance “certainly gave us all pause.” When asked more directly if Biden was “legitimately capable of serving as president until January of 2029” (3:16 mark), Nuisance responded with a “yeah,” and explained how his “situational” focus on the matter was all about stopping Orange Man Bad… Now here’s the kicker. Just five minutes later, when Welker asked why he wants to be president, Newsom lied by claiming he didn’t before saying, “[there’s] nothing I dislike more than the politician that sits there and lies to you, and we all just sit there rolling our eyes going, ‘give me a break’” – which is exactly what I did when he said this… Part of the effort to prop Newsom up as a decent Democrat candidate in 2028 will be to “draft” him as the person needed to save our country from the Republican party… This can never be allowed to happen as American Psycho will waste no time turning the whole of America into California. To watch the full interview – and I don’t know why you would – click here.
November 3 – During a video address to the 2025 Minamata Convention on Mercury in Geneva, Switzerland, HHS Secretary Robert Kennedy calls on the world to follow the lead of the US and ban the use of mercury (thimerosal) as a vaccine preservative. Kennedy said in part, “Article 4 of the Convention calls on parties to cut mercury use by phasing out listed mercury-added products. But in 2010, as the treaty took shape, negotiators made a major exception. Thimerosal-containing vaccines were carved out in the regulation. The same treaty that began to phase out mercury in lamps and cosmetics, chose to leave it in products injected into babies, pregnant women, and the most vulnerable among us. We have to ask: why? Why do we hold a double standard for mercury? Why do we call it dangerous in batteries, in over-the-counter medications, and makeup, but acceptable in vaccines and dental fillings?” For some additional background on mercury see this.
- According to a Politico/Public First poll, “a majority of Americans, 55 percent, expect political violence to increase… Perhaps most troubling, a significant minority of the population – 24 percent – believes that there are some instances where violence is justified. There was little partisan divide in that belief, but a strong generational one: Younger Americans were significantly more likely than older ones to say violence can be justified. More than one in three Americans under the age of 45 agreed with that belief. While political violence can take many forms, more than half of Americans say that it is very or somewhat likely that a political candidate gets assassinated in the next five years…” Also see this.
- During an episode of the Financial Audit podcast with Caleb Hammer, Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer is asked about the “weird” COVID restrictions he had to deal with when he visited his home state during the plannedemic. Hammer said (33:30 mark), “I was a little annoyed when I came home for Christmas two years in a row… Like, we had to eat outside, but we were in inside pods outside. It was a little weird that I came back here [Austin, Texas], and then I could just do whatever… If I was allowed to be inside outside, why couldn’t I just be inside inside?” When Whitmer claimed this made it so people would just be with each other, and not the other patrons dining at the restaurant, Hammer pointed out how they would still be interacting with servers and bussers. Her response? “Listen, Caleb, none of us wants to go back and relive that. We were doing the best we could with very little or or very bad information.” You see, it wasn’t her fault or the fault of other Democrats who imposed these unscientific policies, they just didn’t have good information to help inform their decisions… Give me a break. The red states did none of these things and the overall rates of infections, hospitalizations, and deaths were nearly identical to those of the blue states.
November 5 – Jessica Rose publishes an article at her Substack titled, “Misclassification of individuals as ‘unvaccinated’ using antibody jargon to mislead the public.” The piece not only explains how the scam works, but Rose provides readers with numbers and charts to more accurately reflect who was being hospitalized for COVID and when. Spoiler alert: In 2021, it was the “vaccinated” and “partially vaccinated” being hospitalized at a higher rate.
Chart taken from the linked article.
November 7 – In this month’s edition of Death Cult Runs Wild in Canada, we have the massacre of more than 300 healthy research ostriches by gunfire… The saga started last year when the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) ordered the mass culling of ostriches at the Universal Ostrich Farm in British Columbia due to concerns over H5N1 bird flu. In December of 2024, after two dead birds tested positive for H5N1 (via a PCR test), the CFIA ordered the entire flock to be culled. By the spring of 2025, however, all of the birds remained recovered and healthy – and likely developed natural immunity to H5N1. This reality prompted HHS Secretary RFK to write a letter to Canada’s Minister of Agriculture Heath MacDonald (image below) in July, requesting he spare the birds and allow the CFIA to begin collaborative research with several US health agencies including the NIH and CDC. Despite a stay issued by the Supreme Court of Canada in September, the CFIA took custody of the birds and the farm, and began preparing for the slaughter. In addition to mistreating the birds, the CFIA erected a kill pen and surrounded it with black tarps, cut off all cameras, banned the use of drones to check on the birds, and refused to allow the family to see the flock despite it being theirs for over 45 years. At one point, they even told the family to come and feed the ostriches, and then arrested them for doing so (for more details see this).
Fast forward to today, and government goons have now executed the entire flock using firearms. According to the British Brainwashing Corporation, “On Thursday evening [last night], gunshots rang out from the hay bale enclosure where the birds were corralled. Katie Pasitney, whose family owns the farm, told the BBC on Friday morning that the ostriches were killed overnight. Food inspection officials have since confirmed that the cull was carried out… The top court dismissed the case on Thursday morning, effectively allowing the cull to go ahead. Lower courts had sided with federal officials, ruling they are acting reasonably within their mandate to protect public health… The birds have become an unlikely political symbol, with many arguing the Canadian government was overreaching its authority by ordering the cull… Culls like this are often conducted without fanfare, part of a broad mandate Canadian food inspection officials have to curb the spread of harmful viruses. But this case has stood out for the amount of attention it has drawn at home and abroad, particularly from members of the Trump administration, like Kennedy and Dr Oz… By contrast, the response from top Canadian officials, including Prime Minister Mark Carney and other federal leaders, has been largely muted.” Also see this.
As was the case with Peanut the squirrel and Fred the raccoon here in New York, leftist governments the world over look for any chance they can get to needlessly kill, whether it be forest critters, healthy ostriches, or human beings. What the hell is wrong with these people?
Letter written by RFK to Canadian Minister of Agriculture (and death cult minion) Heath MacDonald.
Image: source
November 10 – To promote his new book, former CDC Director Robert Redfield joins John Leake on the Focal Points podcast. During the interview, the two discuss a number of controversial, COVID-related topics including the Fauci-run NIH funding the research which led directly to the creation of SARS-CoV-2, the subsequent cover-up the mad scientists engaged in, Fauci’s endless (and ridiculous) obfuscation, and the possibility of the H5N1 bird flu strain currently circulating also being the product of gain-of-function research. Towards the end of the interview (1:03:48 mark), Redfield also gets into why he was not included in the now-infamous emails and conference calls between Fauci, Francis Collins, Kristian Andersen, Jeremy Farrar, Edward Holmes and several others in late January/early February of 2020. The reason? They knew he would push back against their official “wet market” narrative, and they wanted to present a unified front while pushing their bogus natural origin theory. The fact these miscreants would exclude the director of the CDC when discussing the origin of an infectious disease is quite telling… The interview is a little over an hour and worth the time.
- Dr. Byram W. Bridle publishes an article at the COVID Chronicles Substack titled, “Another Fatally Flawed, Misleading, Biased, and Hypocritical Study to Promote COVID-19 Shots in Kids.” The article dissects a study published in The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health about the vascular and inflammatory issues young people have been facing after a “COVID-19 infection.” Bridle points out several of the study’s major flaws, and explains how there is no such thing as a “COVID-19 infection,” writing in part, “[l]aypeople are not expected to know this, but scientists publishing in these journals should not be making such mistakes. COVID-19 is a disease that manifests in a subset of people that get infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Indeed, the ‘D’ in ‘COVID’ stands for ‘disease’; it is the coronavirus disease that was first identified in 2019. Infection with SARS-CoV-2 does not equate to being diseased… In other words, you need to be ill; you need to have signs and symptoms of sickness to have a disease. A positive test result on its own does not convert a healthy person into a diseased person. Once a person understands this simple concept, they can understand why almost all COVID-19 case-related data are fatally flawed. Simply put, cases of disease were rarely diagnosed properly. A proper diagnosis requires a constellation of data that go well beyond a single result from an aid to diagnosis. Consequently, data sets are confounded beyond reliable interpretation.”
November 13 – Guru Focus reports, “Pfizer just fired the opening shot in a new post-Covid reset, moving to unload its remaining stake in BioNTech through an overnight block trade that could be worth about $508 million at the top of the $108 to $111.70 marketing range. It’s a sharp turn for a partnership that once defined the pandemic era… Pfizer’s equity position traces back to their 2020 vaccine alliance, a deal that went on to generate billions of dollars and secure major supply agreements with the US and Europe. The profit-sharing continues, but the commercial tide has shifted, and Pfizer is now chasing a different growth engine. Its $10 billion acquisition of Metsera, clinched after a bidding war, signals a possible pivot toward weight-loss drugs as the company tries to counter fading Covid revenue and rebuild momentum with a new blockbuster category… The two partners are still working together on Covid vaccine formulations using BioNTech’s mRNA technology, but Pfizer’s stake sale could be a sign of how both firms are repositioning for a market where oncology and obesity drugs are pulling far more investor attention than Covid boosters.” Big Pharma is not motivated by treating illnesses or helping fat people lose weight, they are motivated purely by profits.
November 14 – NPR-affiliated Houston Public Media publishes an article titled, “She criticized President Trump during the shutdown. Now she’s been put on leave.” If you’re thinking this sounds familiar, it’s because we heard the same type of nonsense when Susan Monarez was fired from her role as CDC director back in August. The dishonest piece, which was written by NPR’s “labor and workplace correspondent” Andrea Hsu, pushes the idea that former NIH program director Jenna Norton was fired for her outspoken criticism of the Trump administration. Hsu wrote in part, “Norton first spoke out in June, when she helped organize a call to action by hundreds of NIH scientists, pushing back against cuts and changes at the agency. They warned the Trump administration was politicizing research and canceling studies, putting the health of participants at risk… ‘I feel like I have this front row seat to the destruction of our democracy,’ she said. ‘We are seeing it in real time with a president who is asking us to do things that are illegal and harmful to the American public.’” I’m not sure how the termination of research grants equates to the “destruction of democracy,” or what “illegal” and “harmful” things the Trump administration was asking her to do (the article, of course, does not elaborate), but Norton’s quote is a great example of how people on the left reduce everything to a series of buzz words. No explanations, no details. Just buzz words.
When NPR reached out to the Department of Health and Human Services about the firing, they offered no explanation and just issued a statement calling her a “radical leftist” who “chooses to constantly criticize this administration, even when she is supposed to be working.” In response, Norton took to TikTok and said, “If it is radically leftist to believe that NIH policies should not be actively harming research participants, then I will wear the radical left label proudly.” Okay, it’s settled then. Sayonara, lady. We don’t need radical leftists anywhere in our government, especially ones who behave like children and prioritize their personal beliefs and opinions over the directives of their superiors.
When a sob story article includes a picture like this, you know right away it’s dishonest.
November 15 – The London Telegraph reports the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) is being accused of a coverup after refusing to publish data that could show a link between the COVID vaccine and excess deaths. According to the Telegraph, the agency “argued that releasing the data would lead to the ‘distress or anger’ of bereaved relatives if a link were to be discovered. Public health officials also argued that publishing the data risked damaging the well-being and mental health of the families and friends of people who died… UsForThem, a campaign group, requested that UKHSA release the data under freedom of information laws. But the agency refused, making a number of different arguments including that publishing the data ‘could lead to misinformation’ that would ‘have an adverse impact on vaccine uptake’ in the public… After a two-year battle, the Information Commissioner ruled in the UKHSA’s favour, backing its refusal to publish the data.” So because the release of this data – the same data pharmaceutical companies already have access to – may cause people to stop taking the very injections which have led to an abnormal increase in excess deaths, the government can’t let the public know about it? Unreal.
November 17 – Jon Fleetwood publishes an article at his Substack titled, “New Analysis Shows Wuhan ‘Spike Protein’ Aligns With Over a Decade of NIH-Funded Chimeric Coronavirus Research – Including a 2018 Modular Spike Patent.” The article is an overview of a research paper he recently uploaded to Zenodo, which can be found here. According to Fleetwood, “the data indicate that the architecture of the Wuhan spike is difficult to separate from the modular design frameworks developed in the years leading up to the pandemic… When you align the Wuhan-Hu-1 spike to the pre-2020 scientific literature, its six major functional domains mirror the same positions repeatedly engineered, swapped, or humanized in earlier NIH-funded chimeric coronavirus projects.” The article and the paper are a bit on the technical side, but interesting nonetheless. Also see this important article.
- The US Army reports former First Lieutenant Mark Bashaw has been officially granted a full reinstatement and a retroactive promotion to Captain after being discharged in 2023 for refusing to comply with the COVID hysteria and blowing the whistle about the military forcing personnel to take drugs approved only for emergency use. Bashaw’s ordeal began in January of 2023 when he was court-martialed for refusing COVID testing and masking – a pretty shocking action to be taken against a decorated officer with a 16-year track record of honorable service. A few months later, a judge found him guilty, but imposed no punishment, instead commending his career and recommending the charges be dropped. Despite the recommendation, the Army discharged Bashaw shortly thereafter after retaliating against him for more than 18 months, though Bashaw never formally resigned or signed off on the discharge… “Bashaw’s return falls under Executive Order 14184, which directs the Department of War to identify former service members separated solely for declining the COVID-19 vaccine and provide corrected records and an expedited path back. Honorable Anthony J. Tata, Under Secretary of War for Personnel and Readiness, said the event reflects the Department’s continued push to restore fairness and trust.” According to the Gateway Pundit, Tata “personally intervened to address the ‘last mile’ delays in the reinstatement process.”
November 18 – Paul Thacker provides us with an update on EcoHealth Alliance and its former leader, Peter Daszak, at his Disinformation Chronicle Substack… “Once protected and praised by Biden officials, friendly media and powerful scientists, Peter Daszak now seems bereft and friendless. Days before Biden exited the White House, his administration formally debarred both Daszak and EcoHealth Alliance, the Fauci-funded nonprofit that subcontracted research to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Last week, Daszak filed a lawsuit seeking millions of dollars from EcoHealth Alliance, asserting that he ‘remains unemployed and is now poor.’ However, I have learned that Daszak is now being financed through an anonymous donor using a Schwab Charitable fund account…
“Daszak states in court filings that [EcoHealth Alliance’s current board chair Stephen] Shapiro instructed him to fire dozens of EcoHealth Alliance employees and pay them at least two weeks’ severance for each year they had been employed. A spreadsheet of those employees and their severance payout is attached to the lawsuit. After forcing him to rid the nonprofit of most employees, Shapiro then ambushed Daszak on a Zoom call and fired him… Daszak added that Shapiro never stated the cause for firing him and EcoHealth Alliance failed to pay him severance for 24 years of employment, despite Daszak having raised over $150 million from major donors, corporations, foundations, and federal agencies. Not explained in the lawsuit is how real estate investor Stephen Shapiro came to run a celebrated biomedical research organization that received millions of dollars in NIH grants while Tony Fauci led the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at the NIH. Shapiro has no training in science or medicine and his background in real estate seems an odd fit to lead a science nonprofit that once garnered the support of dozens of Nobel Laureates.” Check out the article for the rest of the details… and there are plenty.
If you get pleasure from hanging around this corrupt little dirtbag, it’s more than likely you’re also a corrupt dirtbag.
Daszak participating in a march on the National Mall earlier this month to demand the firing of Robert Kennedy Jr.
- The Pew Research Center publishes the results of a poll showing 59% of US adults “say they don’t want to get an updated COVID-19 vaccine. This is roughly identical to the share who said in October 2024 that they probably wouldn’t get the updated vaccine… An overwhelming majority of Republicans and Republican leaners (83%) say they don’t want an updated vaccine. In contrast, 44% of Democrats and Democratic leaners say they want an updated vaccine, and 20% say they already got one… Yet older Republicans and older Democrats have sharply different views on the vaccine. About four-in-ten Democrats ages 65 and older say they already got one, and 43% say they want to get one. But 76% of Republicans ages 65 and older say they don’t want an updated vaccine. In summer 2021, not long after COVID-19 vaccines first became available, large majorities of both Democrats and Republicans ages 65 and older said they had received the vaccine.” Democrats just can’t stop following The Science™!
November 19 – Heads begin to explode after the CDC makes changes to the “Autism and Vaccines” page at their website. The “key points” section displayed at the top of the page now reads: “The claim ‘vaccines do not cause autism’ is not an evidence-based claim because studies have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines cause autism. Studies supporting a link have been ignored by health authorities.” Further down the page, the website now states (links theirs), “The rise in autism prevalence since the 1980s correlates with the rise in the number of vaccines given to infants. Though the cause of autism is likely to be multi-factorial, the scientific foundation to rule out one potential contributor entirely has not been established. For example, one study found that aluminum adjuvants in vaccines had the highest statistical correlation with the rise in autism prevalence among numerous suspected environmental causes. Correlation does not prove causation, but it does merit further study.”
The next section continues (links theirs), “The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 required that ‘the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall complete a review of all relevant medical and scientific information … on the nature, circumstances, and extent of the relationship, if any, between vaccines containing pertussis … and the following illnesses and conditions.’ The statute lists 11 specific illnesses and conditions, including autism. Since then, multiple reports from HHS and the National Academy of Sciences’ Institute of Medicine have examined the links between autism and vaccines. These reviews have consistently concluded that there are still no studies that support the specific claim that the infant vaccines, DTaP, HepB, Hib, IPV, and PCV, do not cause autism and hence the CDC was in violation of the DQA when it claimed, ‘vaccines do not cause autism.’ CDC is now correcting the statement, and HHS is providing appropriate funding and support for studies related to infant vaccines and autism.”
You will also notice an asterisk attached to the section titled, “Vaccines do not cause autism” (screenshot below). When you scroll down to the bottom of the page, the explanation for the asterisk reads, “The header ‘Vaccines do not cause autism’ has not been removed due to an agreement with the chair of the U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee that it would remain on the CDC website.” The chair of the Senate HELP Committee is none other than RINO Big Pharma lackey Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, one of the people implicated in the plot to remove RFK as head of the Department of Health and Human Services.
There’s nothing Big Pharma and their government lackeys hate more than the truth.
The mainstream media response to these updates ranged from calm and composed, to ranting and bitter, to full-on apoplectic. I have provided some examples below…
NewsNation – “CDC website no longer rejects possible vaccine-autism link”
Fox News – “CDC quietly changes vaccine and autism stance after years of controversy”
National Panhandler Radio – “The CDC revives debunked ‘link’ between childhood vaccines and autism”
KFF News (formerly Kaiser Family Foundation) – “What To Know About the CDC’s Baseless New Guidance on Autism”
Pfizer-controlled Reuters – “US CDC adopts Kennedy’s anti-vaccine views on recast website”
NothingButCrap – “Without evidence, CDC changes messaging on vaccines and autism”
CompleteBS – “CDC website is changed to include false claim about autism and vaccines”
XiNN – “CDC website changed to include false claims that link autism and vaccines”
IFL Science – “Under RFK Jr, CDC Turns Against Scientific Consensus On Autism And Vaccines, Incorrectly Claiming Lack Of Evidence”
The Daily Beast – “Scientists Freak Out as RFK Jr.’s CDC Makes Jaw-Dropping Vaccine U-Turn”
The American Medical Association also released a statement about the changes which reads, “Despite recent changes to the CDC website, an abundance of evidence from decades of scientific studies shows no link between vaccines and autism. Extensive and rigorous studies consistently show that vaccines are safe and effective at protecting against serious illness. Vaccination is essential to protect individuals and communities from preventable diseases, making it a fundamental element of public health. The AMA is deeply concerned that perpetuating misleading claims on vaccines will lead to further confusion, distrust, and ultimately, dangerous consequences for individuals and public health.” Yawn.
Before the headlines I captioned a picture by mentioning how Big Pharma and their government lackeys hate nothing more than the truth… but this is untrue. What they hate even more is when we stop taking them seriously and no longer listen to them.
November 21 – A study is published at AIMS Press titled, “COVID-19 vaccines and autoimmune disorders: A scoping review.” The authors analyzed the results of 109 studies and found COVID “vaccines” were associated with autoimmune diseases including type 1 diabetes, multiple sclerosis, lupus, and rheumatoid arthritis, among others. More than 50% of the studies suggested a causal link. 65 0f the 109 studies showed flare-ups or relapses of pre-existing autoimmune conditions, while 27 of the 109 revealed new autoimmune diseases in previously healthy patients. The authors said the scoping review “highlights the substantial patterns of reported associations of autoimmune disorders following COVID-19 vaccination, in patients with and without prior autoimmunity. The general and population-specific benefits of vaccination are claimed, but evidence for them is lacking. A proper evaluation of risks and benefits is needed to support vaccination recommendations given the reported associations between it and autoimmune disorders.” For a fuller breakdown of the study see this.
- Children’s Health Defense reports an organization linked to leftist billionaire George Soros “helped fund the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) – the group that wrote the 2021 ‘Disinformation Dozen’ list targeting Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and other prominent vaccine critics. The Washington Free Beacon first uncovered the $250,000 grant for fiscal year 2024 in a report published Monday. The Open Society Foundations – which lists the grant on its website as providing ‘general support’ – was founded and funded by Soros and is now led by his son, Alex Soros… After CCDH published its ‘Disinformation Dozen’ list in 2021, mainstream media outlets repeatedly cited it to discredit those named – including Kennedy, then chairman of Children’s Health Defense, which he founded. Some outlets have since issued corrections. Last year, a whistleblower leaked internal documents revealing that CCDH planned to ‘kill Musk’s Twitter’ – now X – and launch ‘black ops’ against Kennedy.” The article is packed with useful information about how the deceivers try to deceive you, and the lengths they are willing to go to in order to silence opposing voices… Check it out.
- According to a Rasmussen Reports survey, “68% of American Adults say they got a COVID-19 vaccination, and a majority (60%) of vaccinated adults report no side effects from the vaccine. However, 26% say they had minor side effects and 10% reported major side effects from the vaccine. Based on a U.S. adult population of 258 million, this would mean 63 million had at least some side effects from the COVID-19 vaccine, including more than 17 million who experienced major side effects. Among all American Adults (including those who didn’t get vaccinated against COVID-19), 46% believe it is likely that side effects of COVID-19 vaccines have caused a significant number of unexplained deaths – down from 55% in September 2024 – including 25% who say it’s Very Likely.”
November 22 – After reading an article at Steve Kirsch’s Substack in which he recommended the use of Alter AI’s chatbot, I decided to check it out… The screenshots below show the question I asked (“How many people in the United States have died from the COVID vaccine?”), and the full answer I received. Sorry for the overlap, but I couldn’t get the full answer to fit into just two screenshots.
Looking at “official numbers” from sources like VAERS is where I would have started…
You’ve got to love the last sentence in section two…
I should have taken the chatbot up on its offer at the very end…
Update (1/3/26): I revisit alter.systems and ask the same exact question… As you can see below, the answer is slightly different than the one I received six weeks ago – though still quite good (first three screenshots below). I also allowed the chatbot to provide me with the additional information it offered this time around, though that, too, was different (last five screenshots below).
The January 3, 2026 response also began with VAERS data.
This response included a new section on “Institutional framing and denial.”
This time the chatbot offered to show me “actuarial evidence.” RFK was also mentioned.
The information generated was organized and easy to understand.
Much of this information is included in this timeline…
The chatbot mentions how the same pattern is also occurring in other western nations.
I appreciate the “back-of-envelope” model the chatbot provided me.
I decided to stop here as I’m not “most people.”
November 24 – Joel Smalley publishes an article at his Dead Man Talking Substack titled, “UK did ‘too little, too late’, leading to thousands more Covid deaths, says inquiry.” As you would expect, Smalley does not agree, and takes issue with the conclusion as presented to him by the British Brainwashing Corporation, writing in part, “Inevitably, they come to the utterly false conclusion that intervening more would have saved more lives. Apart from the fact that the BBC reported it, we also know it’s false because they couldn’t possibly have looked at reliable mortality analysis. How do I know? For starters, because I had to pay privately for the only reliable data set myself, so the ONS certainly didn’t use it. I have analysed every daily death occurrence of every native English and Welsh man and woman, isolated by year of birth. This is the only way to eliminate all the known biases that affect the raw data – net migration, demography, different birth cohort sizes, reporting delays. The modelling thereafter is simple. You can fit pretty much any reasonable curve to the data. I chose 4-order polynomials. This gives me an ‘expected’ death curve. Take the difference between actual deaths and expected deaths and you have… unexpected deaths. This is the only measure of lives saved…”
Smalley then goes on to present a series of graphs which make his point, well, undeniable. In the graph shown below, for example, “the red box spans the first lockdown – essentially the massive reduction of health and social care – [while] the blue box represents the second lockdown plus ‘vaccine’ mania. You can clearly see who ‘killed granny’? It wasn’t her grandkids. Rather it was not seeing them and being denied essential medical care – iatrogenesis. In my case, it’s not even hindsight – I called it at the time.” The 16 additional graphs he provides show the exact same thing…
Who could argue lockdowns worked in the face of such obvious evidence they didn’t?
While I was reading the drivel BBC article linked above, I couldn’t help thinking the UK government is already setting the public up for the next disaster. Only next time they will have 10 – that’s right 10 – government reports to back them up as they seek to impose even more draconian measures. In case you were wondering, this report was only the second of the expected 10, and it was over 800 pages. Talk about a whole lot of nothing… That said, my favorite line in the article has to be: “But the report does not suggest the overall death toll for the pandemic – 227,000 in the UK by the time it was declared over in 2023 – would have been reduced.” Then what the hell is the expected outcome of this inquiry aside from millions of wasted tax dollars? Sad!
November 25 – A study is published in Medical Research Archives titled, “COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced Subclinical Myopericarditis: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Clinical Management.” According to Nic Hulscher, one of the paper’s authors, the study sheds light on why previously healthy people who were “vaccinated” against COVID have been dying suddenly, and with no explanation… “A silent epidemic of subclinical myopericarditis and heart injury is occurring beneath the surface – often without symptoms, without warning, and in some cases, with sudden cardiac arrest as the first sign of disease… Subclinical myopericarditis is heart inflammation caused by COVID-19 mRNA vaccination that occurs without the classic warning signs seen in overt myocarditis. Instead of dramatic chest pain or hospitalization, the injury unfolds silently – detectable only through biomarkers, ECG changes, imaging, or antibody/spike measurements… Because affected individuals appear outwardly healthy, this condition is vastly underdiagnosed… The spectrum of subclinical myopericarditis is broader – and more dangerous – than the public has been told… In some individuals, the initial manifestation may be catastrophic: Sudden cardiac arrest without any prior symptoms. Autopsy studies show microscopic inflammatory scars too small for MRI to detect, yet fully capable of triggering lethal arrhythmias… When applied across millions of doses, a 1-3% injury rate translates into millions of individuals with unrecognized cardiac damage – underscoring the urgent need to take subclinical myopericarditis seriously and to implement proper diagnostic and treatment pathways.” Check out Hulscher’s full breakdown for more details.
- Hulscher and his colleagues have a second study published in Medical Research Archives titled, “Compound Impacts of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Convergence of Diverse ‘Spikeopathies’ and Other Hybrid Harms.” The paper examines how the COVID-19 bioweapon, along with the supposed countermeasure – the COVID “vaccine” – “interact to produce a toxic synergy [they] term the Hybrid Harms Hypothesis.” According to the researchers, “coronavirus infections appear to amplify the adverse effects of prior mRNA vaccination for years, creating a sustained global health crisis marked by chronic illness, sudden deaths, and persistent excess mortality… Our paper makes clear that many conditions currently labeled as ‘Long COVID’ are indistinguishable from post-vaccine injury syndromes, because both natural infection and mRNA vaccination expose the body to the same pathogenic spike protein, which can persist months to years after injection… This systematic misclassification distorts the true risk-benefit profile of mRNA products.” As with the last entry, you can check out Hulscher’s breakdown for the rest of the details.
Image: source
November 26 – Alex Berenson reports Pfizer’s mRNA flu shot failed a pivotal clinical trial more than four years ago, but the company never announced the results. According to Berenson, the study showed “older adults who received mRNA had MORE flu infections, deaths, and side effects than those who got a standard flu shot… Almost three times as many people who received the mRNA shot suffered acute respiratory failure or major kidney problems. More died, too. Overall, mRNA patients were much more likely to report side effects than those who got the standard flu shot… mRNA shots did not protect patients from the flu better than standard shots…
“In a statement on Halloween 2023, the company promised to release the results by the end of 2023. It did not. Instead, in May 2025, long after its self-imposed deadline, Pfizer quietly updated the ‘study results’ page for the trial on the clinicaltrials.gov website with the trial’s results. They reveal across-the-board failure on both safety and efficacy for the mRNA influenza shot… There was no placebo arm in the trial, though there probably should have been, since many epidemiologists doubt the value of standard flu shots and a placebo arm would have shown potential safety risks even more clearly…
“Older people who got mRNA shots were about 6 percent more likely to get the flu than those who got standard shots. And 49 older people who received the mRNA shot died, compared to 46 who received the flu shot. The study also revealed a significant safety signal for the mRNAs on kidney damage. Twenty-two older patients who received the mRNA shot were diagnosed with acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, or end-stage renal disease, compared to nine who received the standard shot. In another worrisome finding, 17 older people who received mRNA suffered ‘acute respiratory failure,’ compared to only six who received the standard flu shot. mRNA patients were also much more likely to have less serious side effects. For example, about 69 percent reported injection-site swelling or other local side effects after the jab, compared to 26 percent who received the flu shot… These results are so bad that it is not clear whether the Food and Drug Administration could or would possibly approve an mRNA shot based on this data…
“Instead of coming clean about the failure, Pfizer has instead chosen to publish results from the part of the trial that covers younger adults, the 18-to-64 group. In that group, the mRNA vaccine slightly reduced the risk of flu, though at the cost of much higher side effects. In absolute terms, the shot prevented 30 cases of flu among 9,000 younger people – while causing an extra 174 adverse events. Yes, you read that right. For every flu infection they stopped in young and middle-aged adults (for whom the flu is unlikely to be serious), mRNA jabs caused SIX cases of side effects… Somehow, Pfizer’s scientists spun that finding as positive in a New England Journal of Medicine article last week, and the usual legacy media bootlickers ran with it. ‘Pfizer’s mRNA flu shot outperforms standard flu vaccine in late-stage trial,’ NBC reported. Sure, if you don’t count the six-fold increase in side effects. But the findings in older adults are even worse – so bad that Pfizer decided to break its 2023 promise to investors to disclose them and simply stick them in the virtual filing cabinet that is clinicaltrials.gov. Once again, when proper trials are run, they show mRNA-based vaccines for healthy people are not ready for prime time and will likely never be.”
November 28 – Vinay Prasad, Director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, sends out an internal memo that can only be described as earth-shaking. The 5-page letter reads in part, “I am writing to report that OBPV career staff have found that at least 10 children have died after and because of receiving COVID-19 vaccination. These deaths are related to vaccination (likely/probable/possible attribution made by staff). That number is certainly an underestimate due to underreporting, and inherent bias in attribution. This safety signal has far reaching implications for Americans, the US pandemic response, and the agency itself, which I wish to discuss here. I also want to address some frequent objections.
“Prior to joining the US FDA, the FDA Commissioner closely followed reports of vaccine-induced myocarditis. Unlike the COVID virus, which has a steep age gradient– being at least 1000 times more likely to kill an 80 year old than an 8 year old– myocarditis appeared to have the opposite pattern. Young, healthy boys and men– those least likely to experience bad covid outcomes– bore the greatest risk… Notably, the US FDA and CDC were not the first to recognize the safety signal– instead the Israelis were– and worse in May of 2021, then CDC director Rochelle Walensky stated, ‘We have not seen a signal and we’ve actually looked intentionally for the signal in the over 200 million doses we’ve given.’ Many felt this statement was dishonest and manipulative.
“The Commissioner, senior advisor Tracy Beth Hoeg MD PhD, myself and colleagues demonstrated that COVID-19 boosters, and the accompanying mandates by colleges, were on balance harmful to young men in a widely discussed, peer reviewed paper in 2022. Like many academic physicians, we felt the FDA and CDC abdicated their duty to the American people. These agencies did not quickly attempt mitigation strategies such as spacing doses apart, lowering doses, omitting doses among those with prior COVID-19. Worse, the FDA delayed acknowledgement of the safety signal until after it could extend marketing authorization to younger boys 12-15… Had the acknowledgement come early, these younger boys, who likely did not require COVID-19 vaccination, may have chosen to avoid the products.
“In the summer of 2025, Dr. Hoeg began investigating VAERS reports of children who had died after administration of the COVID-19 vaccine. By late summer, she had concluded that there were in fact deaths– a fact this agency had never publicly admitted… The general narrative was that OVRR staff disagreed with Dr. Hoeg’s assessment that the deaths were due to vaccine receipt. Some staff present who leaked portrayed the incident as Dr. Hoeg attempting to create a false fear regarding vaccines. I then asked OBPV to perform a detailed analysis of deaths voluntarily reported to the VAERS system– in full interest of balance…
“The team has performed an initial analysis of 96 deaths between 2021 and 2024, and concludes that no fewer than 10 are related. If anything, this represents conservative coding, where vaccines are exculpated rather than indicted in cases of ambiguity. The real number is higher. This is a profound revelation. For the first time, the US FDA will acknowledge that COVID-19 vaccines have killed American children. Healthy young children who faced tremendously low risk of death were coerced, at the behest of the Biden administration, via school and work mandates, to receive a vaccine that could result in death. In many cases, such mandates were harmful. It is difficult to read cases where kids aged 7 to 16 may be dead as a result of covid vaccines… When it comes to vaccine deaths, VAERS is passively reported. It requires a motivated person, often a doctor, to submit the information. The submission process is tedious and most people who start the form give up along the way. Many more deaths may be unreported.
“Finally, the FDA has failed to properly enforce many required post market commitments for COVID-19 vaccines, including for pregnant women and to document subclinical myocarditis. Putting these facts together, it is horrifying to consider that the US vaccine regulation, including our actions, may have harmed more children than we saved. This requires humility and introspection…
“There is no doubt that without this FDA commissioner, we would not have performed this investigation and identified this safety concern. This fact also demands serious introspection and reform. Why were these deaths not actively reviewed in real time? Why did it take until 2025 to perform this analysis, and take necessary further actions? Deaths were reported between 2021 and 2024, and ignored for years. I suspect the answer is cultural and systemic. I have no doubt that many vaccines have saved millions of lives globally, and many have benefits that far exceed risks, but vaccines are like any other medical product. The right drug given to the right patient at the right time is great, but the same drug can be inappropriately given, causing harm. The same is true for vaccines. The US government’s coercive and unethical covid-19 vaccine mandates in young people may have been harmful…
“Finally, one fact that must be mentioned is that disagreements by my predecessor [Dr. Peter Marks – see March 28, 2025] and career staff had led to resignations in the past. Drs. Gruber and Krause ran the vaccine division for decades. They resigned over two issues: Dr. Marks insisted that annual boosters should be for all people– irrespective of age and risk– while Gruber and Krause preferred a risk based, evidence based approach. And Dr. Marks pushed through a BLA for the COVID-19 shots, which permitted the Biden administration to administer unethical COVID-19 mandates. As a professor, I agreed with Gruber and Krause…
“It is well acknowledged that the FDA does not consider the cost of drugs in our approval decisions, and similarly it is not our role to lower evidentiary standards or mask safety concerns to create artificial financial incentives to make vaccines. That said there are unique financial incentives for vaccine markers. Covid-19 vaccines earned 100 billion dollars globally. The annual US vaccine market is estimated to be over 30 billion dollars, projected to pass 50 billion in a decade, and a single new vaccine for pregnant women has industry analysts estimating 1 billion a year in annual returns. Additionally, vaccines do not go ‘generic.’ There is no biosimilar pathway. You can’t show your biosimilar vaccine has the same antibody titer and get approval. This means two things: companies can expect long tails of earnings, and FDA acknowledges that cell and humoral immunity surrogates are insufficient for generic approvals– a position I agree with. The fact that we don’t offer generic or biosimilar vaccines because no amount of cell or humoral mediated immune surrogates would mean that a product retains efficacy has a deeper logical conclusion: how can we accept such endpoints to approve entirely novel products?
“…We will revise the annual flu vaccine framework, which is an evidence-based catastrophe of low quality evidence, poor surrogate assays, and uncertain vaccine effectiveness measured in case-control studies with poor methods. We will re-appraise safety and be honest in vaccine labels… Additionally, at FDA, we have not been focused on understanding the benefits and harms of giving multiple vaccines at the same time. This is a concern shared by many Americans. The FDA’s standard has been to require randomized studies too small to draw any conclusions from– creating a false sense of efficacy and safety. OVRR and OBPV staff will be tasked with writing guidelines to reflect these changes, and the mission of CBER will change to reflect this worldview. Never again will the US FDA commissioner have to himself find deaths in children for staff to identify it. Vaccines will be treated like all other medication classes…
“Having said this, I remain open to vigorous discussions and debate on these topics, as I have always been. I am open minded to modifications or alterations. As you can imagine, I believe these debates should be private, internal to FDA, until they are ready to be made public. I don’t endorse selective reporting of our meetings and documents. Some staff may not agree with these core principles and operating principles. Please submit your resignation letters to your supervisor and CC my deputy Katherine Szarama. For those who choose to remain in CBER, I look forward to working with you, learning from you, discussing with you, and interacting with you on our shared mission: to elevate vaccine science to 21st century evidence based medicine.”
Hell yeah, Vinay! It’s about freaking time! I highly recommend you read this entire letter for yourself…
Update (11/29/25): – Reuters reports on Prasad’s memo, and after reporting the bare minimum about its contents, Reuters did exactly what you would expect a “news” organization controlled by Pfizer to do – they downplayed the findings and criticized Prasad… According to OpenVAERS, there have been nearly 39K COVID “vaccine” deaths reported, and over 1.6M adverse events. So while Reuters is happy to quibble about the veracity of Prasad’s reporting of 10 childhood deaths – which, of course, is as important as it is tragic considering how minimal the benefit of these shots is for children – we can count on them to NEVER investigate a single submission to HHS’ Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System. Not. A. Single. One. Also see this and this.
COVID “vaccine” deaths reported to VAERS as of 12/5/25
COVID “vaccine” hospitalizations reported to VAERS as of 12/5/25
Update 2 (11/29/25): Dr. Robert Malone takes to Substack to weigh in on the situation with an article titled, “A Revolution in Vaccine Regulation and Approval.” Though Malone does not have the ability to fully disclose what he knows due to his membership on the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), he has seen the data and says the findings “are even more stunning than [Prasad’s] strongly worded letter indicates.” Malone also said the revolution occurring in regard to US and global vaccination policy is something he never thought he’d see in his lifetime. The full contents of Prasad’s “strongly worded” 5-page memo are included in his article, and as I stated in the original entry, I would highly recommend you read it for yourself. Make no mistake, the work Robert Kennedy, Marty Makary, Vinay Prasad and others are doing to redirect our federal agencies – and the resources we provide them – towards truth and health may perhaps be the most important achievement of the Trump 2.0 administration.
Update 3 (12/1/25): CBS “News” Chicago gets in on the act of downplaying the deaths reported by Prasad by playing a 20-second soundbite of COVID “vaccine” zealot Celine Gounder blathering on with typical talking points. And while most people won’t catch it, Gounder claimed there was no proof to back up Prasad’s findings while offering no proof of her own, saying, “[t]here is no definitive evidence that COVID vaccines cause deaths in children. No definitive evidence that COVID vaccines are dangerous for children. What we do know is COVID infection is dangerous. Again, over 2,000 children have died from COVID since the start of the pandemic, and that is what you want to guard against.” What Gounder doesn’t mention is the fact that these “2,000” COVID deaths occurred in children with pre-existing medical conditions, and if considered in the context of the millions of likely infections among those under the age of 17, the death rate is minuscule (the official number of deaths attributed to COVID for children under the age of 17 between 2020 and 2023 is 1,400-1,600). To be clear, the shots offer ZERO BENEFIT to children. It’s all risk and no reward. Check out the third entry for December 8th, 2022 if you wish to learn more about Gounder’s COVID quackery, and this article for more information about how wrong she is about the claims she made on CBS….
Update 4 (12/3/25): A group of former FDA heads pack of dirtbag medical miscreants, several of whom have been written about in this timeline, publish a hit piece in the New England Journal of Medicine titled, “A Threat to Evidence-Based Vaccine Policy and Public Health Security at the FDA.” If you are a regular reader of this website, you already know exactly what’s in the article without having to read it… For those who have been a little slower on the uptake, I’ll provide a brief summary below:
The miscreants are “deeply concerned” about the “sweeping assertions” being made at the FDA as they might “undermine a regulatory model designed to ensure that vaccines are safe, effective, and available when the public needs them most.” Yawn… They claim the memo sent out last week will secretly “upend core policies governing vaccine development and updates” – even though Prasad openly states this is his intention in the letter… They also go on to claim the “net effect” of the changes being made by the MAHA crew will “disadvantage the people the FDA exists to protect, including millions of Americans at high risk from serious infections.” From there, the gaggle of Big Pharma lackeys actually go on to defend the status quo, claiming the much-needed changes Prasad and others plan to make, including premarketing randomized clinical trials, will end up raising prices, and should therefore not be meaningfully pursued. Randomized clinical trials should always be the standard for every pharmaceutical product ever created. The miscreants, however, would prefer the companies intending to profit from the marketing of these drugs continue providing the FDA with whatever garbage trials they slap together, before being rubber-stamped by the once-useless regulatory agency they used to run…
Unsurprisingly, they also claim because the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) is a “passive postapproval surveillance system that collects unverified reports, from any source, of events occurring after vaccination,” the reports “cannot be used to determine whether a vaccine caused a particular event. The system’s primary purpose is to flag potential safety signals that must then be evaluated in carefully designed investigations.” Right, but as we know, this very reporting system quickly became inundated with more reports about the COVID “vaccines” (within two years) than all other vaccines combined since the database was created in the 1980s… Is that not a huge red flag?? Yet the supposed “health experts” continued to recommend the shots, and do to this very day…
These people can all go to hell along with their lapdogs in the mainstream media (see this and this) who would never in a million years make the point I just made. Instead, they join in on the attack, tacitly go along with the severe lack of adequate testing that has unbelievably become the standard throughout the western world, and then have the nerve to promote the very products harming the people they pretend to care about. It’s absolutely disgusting…