July 2025

July 1 – The Brownstone Institute publishes a lengthy article titled, “The Plot To Get RFK.” In the piece, author James Lyons-Weiler discusses “a detailed secret trade-association memo plotting the removal of US Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr… It reads like a coup attempt against regulatory reform – and they are spending millions to make sure Kennedy is out of office by September. It seems that the Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO), whose membership includes Pfizer, Merck, Novavax, Vaxcyte, and hundreds of biotech firms that profit from regulatory insulation, has a mole… According to the apparent leaked minutes, verified by the name of the creator of the file, on April 3, 2025, BIO held a ‘Vaccine Policy Steering Committee’ (VPSC) meeting whose internal summary, soon to be publicly available thanks to whistleblowers, reveals a campaign of strategic deception, institutional capture, and psychological warfare and exposes a campaign of institutional deception, investor protection, and coordinated sabotage of the MAHA reform platform… BIO has committed $2 million – half of its cash reserve – to counter what it calls the ‘threat’ posed by Kennedy’s rise. But this is no ordinary PR push. It is a multi-pronged campaign designed to deceive the public, silence dissent, and preserve industry dominance through influence operations masquerading as science…

The document opens with a blunt political calculation: Kennedy’s candidacy threatens investor confidence, regulatory predictability, and the long-term viability of the vaccine business. BIO leadership in the apparent leaked document states plainly: ‘It is time to go to The Hill and lobby that it is time for RFK Jr to go.’ To achieve this, according to the document, BIO intends to deploy surrogates across the political spectrum, co-opt conservative influencers, and bypass direct engagement with the Kennedy campaign altogether. Among the figures named as potential allies in this covert effort: Dr. Mehmet Oz, former Senator Richard Burr (former Senator NC; Advisor DLA Piper Health Policy Steering Committee), Senator Bill Cassidy (in a section of the document focused on strategic influencer engagement and legislative positioning), and the American Enterprise Institute (AEI). These individuals and institutions, the memo suggests, can provide a veneer of bipartisan legitimacy to BIO’s core aim: neutralize Kennedy without ever addressing the substance of his critique… Given Kennedy’s demand for restored liability, long-term data, and placebo-controlled trials, BIO appears to view Kennedy’s proposals as a threat to the entire shortcut pipeline BIO built under EUA conditions.” Check out the rest of this excellent article for all of the details, and to read the leaked 4-page document.

• A compendium study is published on Zenodo titled, “COVID-19 mRNA ‘vaccine’ harms research collection.” Utilizing over 700 peer-reviewed studies, the authors document the now well-known, yet oft-ignored biological risks associated with mRNA injections including the toxicity and persistence of the spike proteins, inflammation associated with lipid nanoparticles, spike protein biodistribution, and immune system imprinting. The study is 180 pages, so I won’t even bother to summarize it. Just let it be known that a giant body of evidence exists showing how harmful the mRNA “vaccines” really are, and now it’s all in one place.
• The Defender reports on a new poll showing 60% of parents with young children support re-evaluating the childhood vaccine schedule, with only 30% of total poll respondents opposing it. Update (7/15/25): A study is published on JAMA showing very similar results.
• A China Joe-appointed leftist federal judge in Rhode Island issues an injunction “at the behest of a group of Democratic-led states who challenged a plan HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced in March to consolidate agencies and fire 10,000 of the department’s employees… The ruling [comes] a day before the terminations of the employees were set to become final. Some of the 10,000 employees had already been reinstated following an outcry over the potential for increased risks to public health.” Reminder: The same leftist scumbags who constantly whine about “Democracy” have no problem undermining it when they lose elections… Total hypocrites. Also see this.

July 2 – In a follow-up article written for The Gateway Pundit (TGP), Dr. Niall McCrae announces the UK’s Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) have finally dropped their case against him – after more than four years! The NMC’s persecution of McCrae began in March of 2021, when he dared to go against the narrative of the COVID cult and published an article at TGP titled, “British Government Study Confirms Covid-19 Vaccine Risk: Infections INCREASE in Fortnight after Jab.” Despite the fact that the information he based his writing on came directly from a Public Health England study, the NMC alleged he “[failed] to uphold [his] position as a registered nurse – in that [he] promoted health advice contrary to official health advice in the context of a global pandemic.” Is it just me, or do leftists take themselves way too seriously? The article is not long at all and worth checking out.

July 3 – The New York Slimes publishes a fluff article titled, “How Health Care Remade the U.S. Economy.” The piece reads in part, “For years, the United States labor market has been undergoing a structural transformation. As jobs in manufacturing have receded, slowly but steadily, the health care industry has more than replaced them. The change has been particularly visible over the past year, during which health care has been responsible for about a third of all employment growth, while other categories, like retail and manufacturing, have stayed essentially flat… The rise of health care jobs is also visible geographically. In 38 states, the industry is now the biggest employer.” The Slimes, of course, tries to spin this into a positive by saying this trend is “not unique” and “as countries get richer and older, more of their employment base shifts into medical fields.” While this may be true to some degree, they barely mention the increase in demand for healthcare services due to the significant increase in chronic conditions over the past few generations, writing only that “Chronic conditions like kidney disease and cancer have become increasingly prevalent…” Since 2000, the total diabetes rate increased from 9.7% to 14.3%, cancer cases increased by over 36% (with over 2M new cases in 2025 alone), and adult obesity rose to over 40%. This doesn’t sound like a country getting “richer and older,” it sounds like a country getting fatter and sicker. Yet the words “Make America Healthy Again” causes half the country to cringe… Sad!

Image taken from the linked NY Slimes article.

Source: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db516.htm 

July 5 – In the immediate aftermath of the horrible floods that hit the Hill Country region of Texas yesterday, pediatrician and COVID cult member Christina Propst took to Facebook to rejoice over the death of dozens of Trump supporters, writing, “May all visitors, children, non-MAGA voters and pets be safe and dry. Kerr County MAGA voted to gut FEMA. They deny climate change. May they get what they voted for. Bless their hearts.” Sadly, this type of demonic bloodlusting has become all too common among those on the political left. Propst is not some purple-haired Antifa crazy, either. She is a doctor who specializes in treating children who should know better than to post anything even remotely close to this online. It doesn’t get much sicker than celebrating the deaths of children because they are from conservative families, but that’s exactly what Propst and many others did following this tragedy. Update (7/6/25): Propst’s employer, Blue Fish Pediatrics, issues a statement condemning her Facebook post. Update 2 (7/7/25): The NY Post reports Propst has been fired from Blue Fish.

July 6 – An article is published in the New England Journal of Medicine titled, “Funding Postauthorization Vaccine-Safety Science.” Written by four men referred to by attorney and medical freedom warrior Aaron Siri as “Dr. Stanley Plotkin and his vaccinologist disciples,” the article admits what has been denied for decades – vaccines are not properly studied pre- or post-licensure, and the true level of vaccine injuries has never been accurately measured. The gaggle of vaccine zealots wrote in part, “the widespread vaccine hesitancy observed during the Covid-19 pandemic suggests that the public is no longer satisfied with the traditional safety goal of simply detecting and quantifying the associated risks after a vaccine has been authorized for use. The public also wants public health authorities to mitigate and prevent rare but serious adverse reactions – which no longer seem rare when vaccines are given to millions or billions of people. [Severe adverse events following vaccination are not rare.] Postauthorization studies are needed to fully characterize the safety profile of a new vaccine, since prelicensure clinical trials have limited sample sizes, follow-up durations, and population heterogeneity. It is critical to examine adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) that have not been detected in clinical trials, to ascertain whether they are causally or coincidentally related to vaccination. When they are caused by vaccines (vaccine adverse reactions), the risk attributable to vaccination and the biologic mechanism must be ascertained. That science becomes the basis for developing safer vaccines, if possible, and for determining contraindications to vaccination and the compensation that should be offered for AEFIs…

Progress in vaccine-safety science has understandably been slow – often depending on epidemiologic evidence that is delayed or is inadequate to support causal conclusions and on an understanding of biologic mechanisms that is incomplete – which has adversely affected vaccine acceptance… In 234 reviews of various vaccines and health outcomes conducted from 1991 to 2012, the IOM [Institute of Medicine – now the National Academy of Medicine] found inadequate evidence to prove or disprove causation in 179 (76%) of the relationships it explored, illustrating the need for more rigorous science… The growing capacity of large health care databases affords new opportunities to obtain real-world data and conduct rigorous studies to quickly investigate AEFIs. The biologic mechanism remains unelucidated for most vaccine adverse reactions – notably, Guillain–Barré syndrome after administration of the 1976–1977 influenza vaccine and several other vaccines thereafter, myocarditis after mRNA-based Covid-19 vaccines, and intussusception [intestinal blockage] after the first rotavirus vaccine. Identifying the biologic mechanisms of adverse reactions – how and in whom they occur – is critical for developing safer vaccines, preventing adverse reactions by expanding contraindications, and equitably compensating vaccinees for true adverse reactions… [This means these things are not currently being done.]

Over the past two decades, many new vaccines have been introduced for children and for vulnerable populations such as pregnant women and older adults. However, aside from emergency appropriations for the H1N1 influenza and Covid-19 pandemics, the budget for vaccine-safety monitoring at the CDC (which is responsible for the majority of U.S. federal efforts) has remained stagnant during this period, at about $20 million per year. Although these resources have been used efficiently, this inadequate level of funding has adversely affected the speed and completeness of the science. [They then suggest raiding the funds that exist to compensate the vaccine-injured to fund this research, but these excess balances only exist because vaccine injuries are rarely recognized.] Though the clear intent of the law creating the VICP [Vaccine Injury Compensation Program] included improving vaccine-safety monitoring and reducing vaccine injuries, the funding to implement it was established by a separate tax code, which permits funds to be used only for payment of compensation and administrative costs of operating the compensation program – not for vaccine-safety monitoring and science. This omission may have been somewhat understandable in 1986, when capacity for safety monitoring and science were less mature, but they have since evolved…

We propose amending the VICP tax code to link funding for vaccine-safety monitoring with vaccine usage. Doing so would not interfere with existing funding for vaccine-injury compensation, since the program has always run a substantial surplus, using only about a third of available funds… [To reiterate, a surplus exists because vaccine injuries often go unacknowledged.] Allowing the use of a portion of the existing federal excise tax to fund vaccine-safety research would ensure that the United States has the surveillance, science, and rapid-response capacity to both detect and prevent vaccine injuries. [They are again saying this is not currently being done.] This long-overdue action would be an important step toward rebuilding public confidence in the immunization system.”

In response to this article, Siri published his own piece to point out what these sneaks are really trying to do – “try and co-op the truth they have lied about for decades by now admitting that the studies to show vaccines are safe do not exist.” He also provides several other key critiques, writing in part, “they conveniently fail to admit that for decades they lied, gaslit, defrauded (and I don’t use that word lightly) the public by claiming that vaccines are probably the most thoroughly safety tested products on the planet and that people should rest assured, no stone on vaccine safety was left unturned. Thus, in their article just published, they pretend they never lied about vaccine safety. They pretend they are now just pointing out vaccine safety has never really been conducted, as if that was not known to them before. Don’t be fooled. Their real agenda is plain, and it is not to study vaccine safety, but rather to confirm that which they already believe. This is crystal clear from the fact that, while their article admits the studies have not been done, they write in the same breath that serious vaccine harms are ‘rare.’ But if the studies have not been done, how do they know that? The answer is, they don’t, and they don’t care to know the truth. Their goal is to protect the products they have spent their careers defending and worshipping and that have brought them fame and riches…

They also ignore the mountain of studies and data which already exist that clearly show serious vaccine harms… If they are really interested in the truth about what injuries vaccines cause and the rate at which these injuries occur, then they should welcome convening a bipartisan panel which could first review all the very concerning studies and hard data that already exists on this topic (often by scientists not on pharma’s dole) and we could design additional studies together and have them run in the open so everybody has to live with the result… Plotkin and company should welcome studies which can show vaccines have not contributed to the rise in chronic childhood disease (many of which are immune mediated diseases) from 12% of children in the early 1980s (when CDC recommended 7 routine childhood injections) to over 50% of children now (when CDC recommends over 90 routine childhood injections). And I think they do welcome such studies if they can assure that the outcome would show vaccines do not cause these harms. Alas, the reality is that (as they know) studies showing vaccines contribute to this rise already exist. But their goal… is to prove their prior assumption that vaccines are safe and harms are ‘rare.’ … As is transparent from their article, the only reason they even pretend to care about vaccine safety is that they want to avoid reduction in vaccine uptake – not actually assure safety.” Sorry for the long entry, but this article and rebuttal provided me with a great way to exemplify how The Science™ really works.

• Doctors Peter McCullough, Paul Alexander, William Makis, Harvey Risch, Nic Hulscher and others publish a preprint study at Zenodo titled, “A Systemic Review of Autopsy Findings in Deaths After COVID-19 Vaccination.” The study, which had been censored by The Lancet before being reuploaded and made available again today, “included 44 papers that contained 325 autopsy cases and one necropsy case. Three physicians independently reviewed all deaths and determined whether COVID-19 vaccination was the direct cause or contributed significantly to death… The most implicated organ system in COVID-19 vaccine-associated death was the cardiovascular system (53%), followed by the hematological system (17%), the respiratory system (8%), and multiple organ systems (7%). Three or more organ systems were affected in 21 cases. The mean time from vaccination to death was 14.3 days. Most deaths occurred within a week from last vaccine administration. A total of 240 deaths (73.9%) were independently adjudicated as directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination… The consistency seen among cases in this review with known COVID-19 vaccine adverse events, their mechanisms, and related excess death, coupled with autopsy confirmation and physician-led death adjudication, suggests there is a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death in most cases.”
• The Executive Director of the Independent Medical Alliance (IMA), Kelly Bumann, is joined by IMA co-founders Paul Marik and Joseph Varon, Scott Schara and Schara’s attorney Warner Mendenhall to discuss the case of Grace Schara, a 19-year-old girl with Down Syndrome who died in a Wisconsin hospital in October of 2021 after receiving the COVID treatment “protocol.” The passionate discussion touches on many important topics including the dangers of incentivised medical care and the verdict reached in the case of Schara vs. Ascension Health, which finally concluded last month (spoiler alert: they didn’t win). Since the loss of his daughter, Schara has become an advocate for patient rights and speaks out against the consequential flaws in our medical system. He also does a podcast on Rumble called Deprogramming With Grace’s Dad. Check it out!
• The Miami Herald reports US Attorney General Pam Bondi may have quietly squashed a DOJ investigation into Pfizer upon taking office, writing, “in [Pfizer’s] most recent annual report, filed three weeks after Bondi took office in early February, there was no longer any reference to the Justice Department investigations into the company’s potential violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practice Act. A quarterly report in May also contains no reference to these investigations… Bondi’s stated goal in making the changes was ‘Removing Bureaucratic Impediments to Aggressive Prosecutions,’ but the actions she and President Trump took were widely seen as a signal that the Justice Department would be less interested in pursuing allegations that major corporations like Pfizer paid bribes to win business abroad. Pfizer is among several companies that filed financial documents this year suggesting that the Justice Department had dropped their federal corruption investigations.” Considering Bondi used to work for a legal firm that represented Pfizer, she should have recused herself and let the process play out. If you’ve been keeping up with this timeline, then you know there is more than enough evidence to make the case that Pfizer is run by dirtbag criminals. 

July 7 – Politico reports “a coalition of doctors’ groups led by the American Academy of Pediatrics filed a lawsuit Monday against Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., arguing that his May announcement that the government would no longer recommend Covid-19 vaccines for healthy pregnant people [don’t they mean pregnant women?] and children violated longstanding norms governing U.S. immunization policy. The organizations say Kennedy’s May 19 ‘Secretarial Directive’ documenting his move to pull the vaccine from the CDC’s immunization schedule constitutes a final agency action ripe for challenge, noting that he cited no emergency or specific circumstantial changes to support the move… The groups are asking a federal judge to order the restoration of the Covid vaccine recommendations to the immunization schedules for children and for pregnant people and to bar HHS from enforcing or publicizing the May directive.” These shots help no one, especially children, yet these ghouls want to keep injecting children and pregnant women for no good reason. For a brief run down of the harm see this.

July 8 – The Daily Caller reports the US Agency for International Development (USAID) “shipped thousands of viral samples to a lab in Wuhan over the course of a 10-year program even though it had no formal agreement with the lab in place, according to previously unreported documents. The documents show that USAID funded the exportation of 11,000 samples from Yunnan Province, where some of the closest relatives of the COVID-19 virus circulate, to Wuhan, the epicenter of the pandemic, with no apparent plan for ensuring the samples were not misdirected to bioweapons and remained accessible to the U.S. government. A $210 million USAID public health program called PREDICT, steered by the University of California-Davis, collected viral samples in countries throughout the globe but lacked long-term storage when funding dried up, according to rudimentary plans in 2019… One of the closest known relatives of the COVID virus is among the viruses sampled with USAID funding… ‘The USAID $210 million contract for PREDICT should have included contractual terms that required all samples, or at least copies of all samples, be transferred to and stored by a US government facility,’ Rutgers University molecular biologist Richard Ebright told the DCNF [Daily Caller New Foundation]. ‘The PREDICT grift did none of this.’”

July 9 – The Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Dr. Vinay Prasad, releases a “Decisional Memo” (this link is a download from the FDA) indicating he is set to authorize the use of Moderna’s COVID “vaccine” Spikevax for children with preexisting conditions only. His reasoning includes: 1) Moderna has never demonstrated a clear health benefit for all children during trials, and therefore he cannot recommend the use of this vaccine in all children, only kids with preexisting conditions, 2) there is no way to know if long term risks (10-20 years down the road) are something to be concerned about, 3) new randomized trials will need to be successfully completed for Moderna’s products to be approved for healthy children, and 4) the decision is a reflection of what the American people want as they have overwhelmingly rejected giving these shots to healthy children. While this is somewhat good news, I still don’t understand how these shots help anyone – especially those with preexisting conditions – considering all the known side effects. 

• A study is published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology titled, “Immune and hematological responses to the third dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine: a six-month longitudinal study.” Researchers looked at 68 young healthy adults (20-30 years old) after they received their third dose of the Pfizer “vaccine” and discovered several serious issues. In just 48 hours after being jabbed, the study participants’ D-dimer levels more than doubled (the test looks for evidence of blood clots), as did their hs-CRP and CRP levels (both of these tests measure inflammation in the body). In addition to these clear signs of inflammation, the participants also experienced immune system suppression with significant drops in their lymphocyte counts and interferon-gamma (a cytokine) level. Why would any young healthy person take this garbage to (supposedly) prevent a cold from becoming a really bad cold? Also see this.
• The Defender reports on CyanVac LLC’s sprayable COVID vaccine trial and how it is raising “significant safety concerns” among scientists and researchers. In addition to the study’s small sample size (only 72 participants) and the absence of an unvaccinated control group, the sprayable vaccine – CVXGA1 – poses significant shredding risks. Researchers plan to enroll 10,000 people for the next phase of their clinical trial.
• Bill Nye the Commie Guy tells Democrat party propagandist Dana Bash he had to block RFK’s number on his cell phone because Kennedy was sending him “page after page” of material showing a link between mercury and autism. Nye claims this link has been “debunked up and down” and said Kennedy “confused causation with correlation.” Way to bury your head in the sand, Bill. Very scientific…  

July 10 – Moderna announces they have received full FDA approval for their mRNA COVID “vaccine” Spikevax for at-risk children ages 6 months to 11 years. According to the press release, “Moderna expects to have its updated Spikevax vaccine available for eligible populations in the U.S. for the 2025-2026 respiratory virus season.” Of course they will, they want to keep the COVID gravy train rolling. This is what all the recent “razor blade throat” propaganda has been about – filling people’s heads with scary words until they’re longing to have themselves injected with unproven, dangerous garbage.

Update (7/20/25): Dr. Robert Malone, who is now a member of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), publishes an article at his Substack in an attempt to make sense of the FDA approval of Spikevax. Malone wrote in part, “[t]he truth of the matter is that I do not really know what happened at FDA to lead to this outcome. Like many, I was shocked and disappointed. Moderna was overjoyed. Their stock value and market capitalization surged, with the climb beginning four days before the announcement, suggesting that someone had insider knowledge. If true, that would likely constitute insider trading. This would precisely be the type of rule-breaking that many have come to expect from this company and sector… The approval was based on the FDA’s scientific review, with Moderna’s CEO, Stéphane Bancel, emphasizing the continued threat of COVID-19 to children, particularly those with underlying medical conditions. Despite the approval, critics have raised concerns about the lack of pediatric safety data and the potential for serious adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis… The FDA and Moderna have acknowledged these risks, and updated package inserts now include stronger warnings about myocarditis and pericarditis.”

Malone then asks some pertinent questions that, while not shedding much light on the situation, are intended to get people thinking about the approval in a different way. These questions include: 1) “Why approve Moderna’s Spikevax for this indication and not provide similar approval for the Pfizer product?” 2) “Did FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary know and endorse this decision, or was it decided and acted upon at the level of FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) Director Vinay Prasad?” 3) “Was the timing of this decision occurring while both Secretary Kennedy and his Deputy Chief of Staff Stephanie Spear were on vacation coincidental?” and 4) “What are the pre-existing conditions that FDA considers as placing ‘children aged 6 months through 11 years at increased risk for severe COVID-19 disease.’ In other words, using plain language, what are the specific diseases of childhood that your child may have that would make them eligible for this FDA licensed product?”

Malone continued, “The days of public tolerance of a paternalistic FDA attitude of ‘we are the professionals and know best, so you do not need to see the data and our analyses’ are over. Show us the data. Plain and simple… Who will establish the standard of care as it relates to this product? Historically, the answer has been [ACIP]. That simple fact illuminates why Pharma’s corporate media lapdogs have all been baying at the moon over Secretary Kennedy’s decision to retire the old ACIP that had devolved into a rubber stamp for FDA and Pharma, and to replace it with members who would insist on independently evaluating the actual data supporting (or not) the use of an infectious disease vaccine or related products for the licensed indication(s)… By charter, the ACIP is required to take up the issue of what advice to provide the CDC Director at the next ACIP meeting, following FDA authorization of a new vaccine product. The ACIP failed to meet this requirement in the case of the recently FDA-authorized Moderna product mNEXSPIKE. I have no idea if or when the ACIP may address this FDA action.

All of which is to say that FDA/CBER director Vinay Prasad has just thrown a hot potato right into the lap of the ACIP, who now stands between this FDA decision and millions of US parents and their children. Well, technically, all the ACIP does is advise the CDC Director, who is currently pending Senate approval. And you know what that means. Dr. Prasad has also functionally tossed that same hot potato into the gears of that Senate Confirmation process… The unfortunate facts are that this decision about FDA/CBER Spikevax authorization ‘for children aged 6 months through 11 years who are at increased risk for severe COVID-19 disease’ was made public by Moderna when both the Secretary of HHS (RFKjr) and his trusted deputy Chief of Staff Stefanie Spears were on vacation. And Moderna certainly made hay while the sun was shining on them… 

Neither Sec HHS nor his deputy Chief of Staff (dCOS) were briefed or read in on this decision. Did the FDA Commissioner know? Did (ex) HHS Chief of Staff Heather Flick know? Did POTUS or his COS know? I do not know the answers to these questions. What I do know is that shortly after the HHS Secretary and his dCOS returned from vacation, a major reorganization of HHS leadership occurred. And that POTUS and his COS were briefed on this decision. There is now a new HHS Chief of Staff… And I hear drumbeats in the distance signaling that the natives believe additional organizational changes will be forthcoming. For those, including myself, who insisted that there be consequences for failing to brief the chain of command regarding this disappointing critical decision by the FDA/CBER director, there is solace in knowing that there were prompt consequences. Whether you agree or disagree with the decision, I hope that all can understand that the federal bureaucracy must recognize that there will be consequences for failing to brief their command chain on politically sensitive decisions. A short, sharp shock was precisely what the doctor recommended.

The narrative on MAHA Twitter after the FDA approved Moderna’s SPIKEVAX vaccine for high-risk children is that this was a betrayal by Secretary Kennedy. But this is the OPPOSITE of what transpired. The Secretary was on vacation and not even briefed on the decision… The reality is that CBER Director Vinay Prasad overruled the FDA regulators who had recommended that all three COVID vaccines currently under the standing EUA be approved for all age groups, including healthy children. Which begs the question, why do we still have an Emergency Use Authorization for these products when there is clearly no medical emergency? Prasad’s justification for this denial should be reassuring to the entire medical freedom movement… Do you think any previous FDA would have rejected the approval of any vaccines, let alone COVID-19 vaccines? The evidence suggests otherwise. This is a massive step forward… And no, despite what some divisive chaos agents have claimed, to date, the new ACIP has not voted to support or not support ANY COVID-19 vaccine product recommendations.”

Update 2 (7/29/25): Vinay Prasad resigns (backup) from his position as director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). Despite Prasad’s role in approving Moderna’s Spikevax COVID shot for “at-risk” children, as well as his leftist leanings and history of being an outspoken critic of President Trump, I am disappointed to see this happen. If he was quietly pushed out by RFK and/or Marty Makary for approving Spikevax without their knowledge, then I will be totally fine with his ouster, but if this was due to public pressure – being delivered mainly by investigative journalist Laura Loomer – then I would have a big problem with the way this went down. Who cares if he was not a Trump supporter? If RFK felt enough confidence in Prasad to nominate him to lead CBER, then that is enough for me. Moreover, had an excellent rapport with FDA Director Makary, who also seemed to have trust in his judgment. The only thing that should’ve mattered at the end of the day were his beliefs regarding medicine, and how he was handling his role working within FDA/HHS. When I spent time here or there watching his videos over the years – several of which are written about in this timeline – I did not think to disregard his medical opinion because he’s a Bernie Bot. To do that would be asinine.

All of that said, I believe Prasad’s resignation had everything to do with the threat he posed to Big Pharma profits, not his political views. For example, less than two weeks ago Prasad told a company called Sarepta Therapeutics they would have to halt shipments of their Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) gene therapy drug Elevidys after a third patient death (they all died from liver failure), as well as suspend their clinical trials. However, just 10 days later, the FDA reversed course and allowed the shipments and trials to resume for ambulant patients (patients not confined to a bed who can move around independently)  – a move Sarepta “commended” in their press release. Now would be a good time to point out Elevidys is a one-time injection that costs a whopping $3.2M. It would also be a good time to point out that the data submitted to the FDA did not prove the drug worked and the agency expressed safety concerns about the administration of an “ineffective gene therapy.” The same is true of another of Sarepta’s products, EXONDYS 51, a drug also used to treat DMD. Approved for use back in 2016, and with a price tag of $750K- $1.5M per year, it was still unclear in 2024 whether or not the drug even works. This much was admitted in their 2016 press release, which reads in part, “a clinical benefit of EXONDYS 51 has not been established. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification of a clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.” Well, as far as I know, these trials were still not complete in 2024 – nearly a decade later. Is it possible Prasad was forced out because of his willingness to push back against this corrupt system? I sure hope not because this means there are serious constraints on what RFK and the MAHA crowd will be able to do, but logic tells me this is likely what happened. Also see this.

Update 3 (7/30/25): The FDA confirms George Tidmarsh will serve as the acting director of CBER until a permanent replacement can be found.

Update 4 (8/11/25): The Associated Presstitutes report Vinay Prasad “is getting his job back as the [FDA’s] top vaccine regulator, less than two weeks after he was pressured to step down at the urging of biotech executives, patient groups and conservative allies of President Donald Trump… Prasad has had the backing of FDA Commissioner Marty Makary and health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who have both called for scrutinizing the use of COVID-19 vaccines. Under Prasad, the FDA restricted the approval of two new COVID-19 shots from vaccine makers Novavax and Moderna and set stricter testing requirements for future approvals.” According to Alex Berenson, NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya told him “he hoped [RFK]… might be able to convince President Trump to change his mind about Prasad… Kennedy came through, and Prasad is back. This is a YUGE loss for swamp creatures like Dr. Scott Gottlieb, the former FDA director… It’s an equally big win for those of us who think drug companies should have to prove their medicines work.” Upon Prasad’s return, Biotech stocks took a bit of a tumble.

• ZeroHedge reports the US “is likely on the way to losing the elimination status” for measles that was declared back in 2000. As of July 8th there have been 1,288 cases across 38 states, the highest number since the US hit 2,126 cases back in 1992. More than half of the cases occurred in Texas after measles spread through their Mennonite communities. 
• Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin announces he has “tasked [his] team at EPA to compile a list of everything we already know about contrails and geoengineering for the purpose of releasing it to [us] now publicly… I want you to know everything I know about these topics, and without any exception. Instead of simply dismissing these questions and concerns as ‘baseless conspiracy theories,’ we’re meeting them head-on.” Zeldin then puts links on the screen (www.epa.gov/contrails and www.epa.gov/geoengineering) “to answer all of our questions.” Well, I checked out the web pages and none of my pertinent questions have been answered. And while things like stratospheric aerosol injection and other geoengineering techniques are touched upon at the “About Geoengineering” page I linked to from the geoengineering web address Zeldin provided, the “What are ‘chemtrails?’” section of this page felt a lot like patronization. It reads in part, “[chemtrails] is a term some people use to inaccurately claim that contrails resulting from routine air traffic are actually an intentional release of dangerous chemicals or biological agents at high altitudes for a variety of nefarious purposes, including population control, mind control, or attempts to geoengineer Earth or modify the weather… EPA is aware that some members of the public are concerned about unusual contrails they see in the sky or reports about geoengineering and dangerous chemicals being sprayed from jet aircraft at high altitudes… When witnessing these phenomena, it is reasonable to ask questions and inquire further to understand what you are seeing.” Gee, thanks for letting me ask questions, EPA. That’s so nice of you… If you’re actually looking for some real answers about chemtrails check out this documentary (and its sequel). Also see this.

July 12 – US Attorney General Pam Bondi takes to X to announce the Department of Justice – “at [her] direction” – has finally dropped their charges (five days into the trial, no less) against the hero plastic surgeon from Utah, Dr. Kirk Moore, adding “Dr. Moore gave his patients a choice when the federal government refused to do so. He did not deserve the years in prison he was facing. It ends today.” Moore was facing up to 35 years for issuing vaccine cards to people who did not want to take the COVID clot shot, and giving saline injections to children whose parents wanted them to believe they were vaccinated without exposing them to any risk. He was also accused of destroying $28K worth of government-paid-for “vaccines,” though his lawyer maintains “no unexpired vaccines were ever destroyed.” In Moore’s view, he was not breaking any law, only disregarding advice from the CDC. And I would agree. He never received a dime for doing any of these things, which amounted only to respecting the wishes of patients who desperately needed an off-ramp. To put it another way, Moore honored his Hippocratic oath. In regard to how he got caught, Moore said none of his patients or office employees snitched on him. As it turns out (12:50 mark), one of his patients was “so anti-vax that when she took her COVID card back to her HR department they said ‘this can’t be possible,’ and they called the Utah Health Department and said ‘Hey, I think there’s something nefarious going on.’” What a crazy world we live in…

Update (7/28/25): An X user with the handle “Smokahontas” posts this disturbing message (emphasis mine): “This morning, I got a text from my boss that said, ‘Hey, I need to talk to you.’ Instantly, my stomach dropped. A few minutes later, he sent me screenshots Facebook had flagged one of my posts about Dr. Moore and COVID… and their AI system actually reached out to him to ask if my post aligned with his morals and values. Yes, an algorithm tried to drag my boss into a ‘moral review’ of my personal Facebook post. Let that sink in: AI not a real person, not a human moderator decided my content was controversial enough to alert my employer and spark a values check. That’s how far it’s gone. Luckily, I have an incredible boss who immediately shut it down with two sharp responses defending my right to speak. But the fact that an AI is now programmed to involve your workplace in content disputes? That should terrify everyone.” I know I’m scared…

Dr. Kirk Moore (Image: source)

July 14 – Aussie17 reports on a presentation broadcasted to the Japanese people by House Rep. Kazuhiro Haraguchi, Tokyo University of Science professor Yasufumi Murakami, and others. After analyzing the vaccine records of over 21 million people obtained through Freedom of Information Act requests, the findings they revealed are simply devastating. Aussie 17 wrote in part, “Murakami estimates that 600,000 to 610,000 Japanese may have died post-vaccination, a figure that aligns eerily with Japan’s excess death statistics. But here’s the kicker – why haven’t these deaths been plastered across headlines? Prof Murakami suggested that they’re happening three to four months later, slipping under the radar of official reports because doctors do not see them as cause of deaths if they are not within a few days after vaccination. The government’s not connecting the dots, folks, and it’s no surprise why. These delayed deaths don’t fit the narrative of ‘safe and effective.’ Instead, they point to a silent crisis that’s been swept under the rug. The good news is this: while Big Pharma pushes forward with its next pet project – the self-replicating mRNA vaccine (aka replicon vaccine) – the Japanese public isn’t buying it. Out of 4.2 million doses rolled out last October, only 10,000 were administered. That’s a measly 0.24% uptake rate. Let that sink in. The people of Japan, armed with growing skepticism and fueled by groups like the United Citizens, have rejected this experimental jab en masse. And they’re not just sitting quietly – over 100,000 signatures were submitted to Japan’s Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, demanding a halt to mRNA vaccinations… This isn’t just Japan’s battle – it’s a global wake-up call. The United Citizens group, with 70,000 supporters and 3,000 volunteers, is pushing for international collaboration to stop mRNA vaccines, including a planned influenza shot set for fall 2025. The group’s database, though currently Japanese-only, is being prepped for English translation, and they’re inviting researchers worldwide to dive in.” The linked Aussie17 article includes the entire 80 minute presentation. 

A few additional details from the presentation via Vigilant Fox: “According to Dr. Murakami, there was no noticeable spike in deaths among the unvaccinated. But among the vaccinated, a clear peak emerged – especially between 90 and 120 days after the shot (first image below this entry)… Then came a graph that was impossible to ignore (second image below this entry). It showed a clear pattern: the more vaccine doses a person received, the sooner they died after their final shot. The title translates to: ‘Number of days from final vaccination to death and number of deaths.’ The note on the right reads: ‘As the number of vaccine doses increases, the peak in deaths appears sooner.’ Each line represents people grouped by the final dose they received before death… What stood out most was the steep green spike representing deaths after the third dose. Not only was it the highest, but it also appeared earlier, around 90 to 120 days. The trend held across the board: as the number of doses increased, the peak of death consistently moved closer to the time of the last injection. As Dr. Murakami noted, ‘We found that as the number of doses increases, the peak of deaths appears faster, meaning the more doses you get, the sooner you’re likely to die, within a shorter period. So, the risk increases with more doses.’” Check out the linked Vigilant Fox article for more information. Update (8/5/25): Masako Ganaha, one of the independent researchers involved with obtaining the 21M vaccine records, joins Nic Hulscher on his Focal Points podcast “to discuss [the] groundbreaking data, the public’s rejection of self‑amplifying mRNA shots, and the ongoing fight to expose vaccine harms in Japan.”

Slide screenshot taken from the presentation.

Slide screenshot taken from the presentation.

• A study is published in Ophthalmic Epidemiology titled, “Evaluation of the Effects of mRNA-COVID 19 Vaccines on Corneal Endothelium.” Researchers discovered serious damage to the eye’s corneal endothelium occurred in just 75 days following the second dose of Pfizer’s COVID “vaccine.” Looking at the eyes of 64 healthy individuals before being vaccinated, and then 75 days after the second dose, the biggest change occurred in regard to Endothelial Cell Density, which on average reduced by 8.4%. The corneal endothelium is very important as it keeps the cornea hydrated and transparent, and these cells do not regenerate once they are damaged or destroyed. Also see this.
• While speaking to the Alabama Grocers Association about some of the economic problems our country faces, Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) told the blunt truth about COVID, saying in part, “Covid absolutely destroyed our country, and we allowed it to happen through federal regulations and shutting down schools, nobody going to work, our health care went to hell in a handbasket. It was devastating, and where did it start? It started in North Carolina. They shipped it to Wuhan, China. They released it there, and look what happened. At the end of the day, you’re going to find out, and of course, everybody said this was a conspiracy theory: it was done on purpose. Made us all sick. It wasn’t as bad physically for those of us that didn’t have bad health problems. If you had a bad health problem, you really struggled with it.” Hat tip to John Leake.
• During an appearance on the Shawn Ryan Show, Commiefornia Governor Gavin Nuisance gets ambushed over the horrible policies he supported and/or deployed during the scamdemic. After a short discussion about guns, and Newsom repeating ridiculous talking points about how red states have the highest level of gun violence (due to leftist-run cities – he left that part out, of course), the conversation turned to COVID (15:30 mark). Ryan began by telling Newsom he had sent a message to his followers on social media, and requested they send in questions to ask. Well, apparently Joe Rogan got the message and texted him a doozy, which lead Ryan to ask: “Who will be held accountable for mandating COVID-19 vaccines for children, which were unnecessary and ineffective, and who will take responsibility for the unprecedented increases in myocarditis and cancer cases among them? Second to that, do you feel any remorse for that draconian decision that was obviously heavily influenced by the pharmaceutical companies’ desire for maximum profit?” In his typical American Psycho fashion, Newsom denied doing anything to benefit Big Pharma, claiming he “has receipts on that,” and said no one should suggest he does the bidding of pharmaceutical companies, adding “quite the contrary.” He then went on to spew more talking points, saying in part, “California like many states, red states included, Florida included, moved forward early in the pandemic, working with the Trump administration and the advisers from the Trump administration to impose dirt and strategies [sic] to mitigate the impacts of this novel disease – coronavirus. What’s interesting about this process is none of us have really reviewed, in an objective way. It’s all through the lens of politics – what we did right, and what we did wrong.” Newsom then claimed “his team” is putting together “an objective review of everything” to get answers about how the pandemic was handled, and went on to make excuses about how he was just going along with what everyone else was doing. In the end, Newsom didn’t answer either question and just said a whole lot of nothing – and Ryan let him slide on it. I can’t think of anyone more full of shit than Gavin Newsom.
• Tobey Rogers publishes an extremely long article at his Substack titled, “How Big Pharma hijacked Evidence-Based Medicine, Part I.” The piece does a great job explaining how “Evidence-Based Medicine is not evidence-based nor medicine.” Shocking, I know… Part II can be found here.
• Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) takes to X to announce he will be reissuing his criminal referral of The Twerp to the Department of Justice. The move comes a day after the New York Slimes confirmed the preemptive pardon Fauci received (for nothing in particular and via autopen) was approved of by an assistant, not China Joe. While I’d love to see that little serial perjurer face justice one day, I’m not holding my breath.

I can’t help wondering about what motivated The Slimes to print this…

July 15 – O’Keefe Media Group (OMG) releases video of one of Johnson&Johnson’s lead scientists, Joshua Rys, admitting their COVID vaccine was “not safe and effective.” Rys told the undercover OMG journalist in part, “None of that stuff [COVID vaccines] was safe and effective… So like, we didn’t do the typical tests. The typical process – that’s why it takes so long to get a product on the market – the typical process is all this clinical trial testing and stuff in a small population. This was just, ‘let’s test it on some lab rat models, analyze, see if it works and stuff like that, and  just throw it to the wind and see what happens…’ I’m sure somebody’s gonna get sued for that stuff, eventually… Do you have any idea the lack of research that was done on those products [COVID vaccines]? You shouldn’t be surprised that this happened. It was pretty much the government kind of made a deal with pharmaceutical companies, and kind of pressured the pharmaceutical companies. Because we’re not going to say no to help the government. The government’s like ‘yo, these three big-ass companies, we need help. We need to figure this out. You’re solving this problem.’ [journalist then asks if that was Operation Warp Speed, to which Rys replies…] I mean we basically just had a race to figure out who could solve it best. Like, people wanted it [and] we gave it to them.” They gave it to us, all right… Blood clots, that is. Update (7/16/25): James O’Keefe confronts Rys at a restaurant over his comments about J&J’s COVID vaccine not being safe and effective. After initially fleeing into the bathroom and then leaving altogether, O’Keefe pursued and asked, “Why say all this stuff to a rando in a restaurant, but not to the American people?” to which he had no reply. Update 2 (7/18/25): OMG catches another lead scientist from J&J admitting something he shouldn’t, this time how their baby powder is contaminated with heavy metals and causes cancer, saying in part, “This is not your father’s J&J… I think they don’t really give a shit about people.” Tell me something I don’t know.

• The Epoch Times reports FDA Commissioner Marty Makary is asking critics to be patient with regard to the COVID vaccines. During an appearance yesterday on Epoch TV’s “American Thought Leaders,” Makary said in part, “I don’t want people to think that we’re blowing off the safety signal[s] that many people have described. I personally know of people who have been injured by the vaccine. I personally know of friends who have lost a loved one from the mRNA COVID vaccine. So I think it is reasonable at this time to say we want good, solid, definitive data, and the conditional, limited approval of the COVID vaccines is in that framework that we want to see a proper dataset come to us so we can take a good look at that data… we have a situation whereby we would love these companies to run a proper randomized, controlled trial. And so if you do nothing – if you reject the COVID vaccines as they come to you for approval – then you have no leverage to be able to ask the company to do that, and those studies may never be done… I would like people to be patient with us as we try to approach this methodologically, collecting the proper data. It is easy to react. I was very angry when I learned that a friend’s father had died from the COVID vaccine. And look, we’re convinced it was causal until proven otherwise… So people have a right to be angry. They have been deceived on different aspects of the COVID pandemic. They have been ordered to march into a vaccine line even if they were healthy and low-risk and already had circulating antibodies. People have a right to be upset, but I would ask people to be patient with us as we do this the proper scientific way.”
• The Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations holds a hearing entitled, “Voices of the Vaccine Injured.” The seven witnesses all told stories about how their lives were turned upside-down because of vaccine side effects, whether due to the death of a loved one, or being left permanently debilitated. One of the witnesses, a doctor from Maryland named Robert Sullivan, shared (43:10 mark) how his lung capacity was cut by 50% after taking the “safe and effective” COVID clot shot recommended by our health agencies. Sullivan would end up being diagnosed with pulmonary hypertension, a condition that keeps the blood pressure elevated and forces the heart to work harder in order to get blood to the lungs. During his testimony he cited a 2022 study that found nearly 20% of athletes (average age of 37) who took a Pfizer booster experienced a near 10% drop in their VO₂max within a week of being injected. In just three weeks after his second dose, Sullivan went from “strong, healthy and thriving” to not being able to walk up a flight of stairs… Despite countless accounts like his and the rest of the witnesses, these deadly jabs remain on the market.
• Representative Tom Massie (R-KY) introduces H.R. 4388 – The PREP Repeal Act. According to the press release, the bill “fully repeals the liability shields and compensation fund provisions under the PREP Act, restores civil remedy rights under federal and state law for those harmed by pandemic products, ensures applicability to current and future lawsuits, including pending appeals, [and] rescinds unused federal funds set aside for PREP Act-related injury claims.” I don’t know why so many people I talk to – both Democrats and Republicans – don’t like Thomas Massie. He comes off as a real person who stands up for what he believes in and is willing to put himself out there by introducing legislation like this… That said, I’d be shocked if this bill goes anywhere.

July 16 – A preprint study is published at Preprints.org titled, “SARS-CoV-2 Semi-Quantitative Total Antibody Correlates with Symptoms of Long COVID in Both Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Subjects.” Researchers sought to “investigate the association between post-vaccination syndrome and Long COVID, [so they] evaluated SARS-CoV-2 Semi-Quant Spike Ab [antibodies] in 100 consecutive patients with symptoms of Long COVID.” The participants consisted of 81 patients with post-vaccine syndrome, and 19 unvaxxed patients with long-COVID symptoms. “SARS-CoV-2 Semi-Quant Spike Ab in the vaccinated cohort showed an average result of 11356.86, while SARS-CoV-2 Semi-Quant Spike Ab in the unvaccinated cohort showed an average result of 1631.94” – a considerable difference.

Defining Long-COVID as “an infection-associated chronic condition that occurs after SARS-CoV-2 infection and is present for at least 3 months as a continuous, relapsing and remitting, or progressive disease state that affects one or more organ systems,” the researchers put forth a couple of possible explanations as to why this occurs, writing, “One hypothesis for Long COVID is that increased levels of circulating spike protein with deposition, either isolated or with immune complex deposition, into various organ systems causes two things. The first is associated problems related to deposition into organ systems, including pericarditis, myocarditis, headaches… and Bell’s palsy to name a few. Another hypothesis is that increasing levels of circulating spike protein also causes immune response with production of antibodies. This is typically an appropriate immune response. The potential problem lies in long-term increased levels of circulation with chronic antibody production, thereby leading to immune fatigue, including pneumococcal antibody deficiencies.”

In regard to post-vaccination syndrome, the researchers wrote, “[this] syndrome could cause long term symptoms by several mechanisms. Vaccine components could lead to chronic inflammation through stimulation of innate immune response via pattern recognition receptors by mRNA, adenoviral vectors, and or nanoparticles. This vaccine induced immune response could trigger autoreactive lymphocytes. Spike protein expression following vaccination circulates in the plasma within one day following vaccination and host interaction with full-length Spike protein, subunits, or peptide fragments could result in prolonged symptoms. [The spike protein’s] potential ability to cross the blood-brain barrier could result in neural or cognitive symptoms, based on biodistribution models of mRNA-LNP. Another concern is that with chronic increased circulating levels of Spike protein with immune response, in addition to developing immune fatigue, the virus may ultimately become an oncogenic virus with alterations in response of neutrophils, memory cells, T cells and antibodies.”

As far as dealing with these prolonged symptoms, researchers suggested several possible treatments including the use of nattokinase, bromelain and/or curcumin, as well as the use of nicotine as it “binds to nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), which are distributed throughout the body, including the respiratory tract, which share similarities with ACE2 receptors, which SARS-CoV-2 uses to enter cells of the host.” How much different would life be in 2025 if The Twerp and his merry band of psychotic mad scientists had never cooked up COVID in the first place?

• CBS reports RFK “has fired two loyalists of President Trump who were serving in top-ranking posts at his department… Multiple federal health officials expressed surprise at news of the firings, which ousted chief of staff Heather Flick Melanson and top policy adviser Hannah Anderson… Two federal health officials said Anderson and Flick Melanson were seen as outsiders to Kennedy’s base, installed by the White House to keep tabs on Kennedy and make sure the president’s agenda was being prioritized.” HHS did not comment on why they were let go. Update (7/20/25): The Gateway Pundit reports Heather Flick Melanson was not fired, but instead resigned from her position. Regardless, it is still unclear if this shake-up had anything to do with the recent FDA approval of Spikevax for children with preexisting conditions.

July 17 – The People’s Voice reports on a Dutch lawyer named Arno van Kessel who was arrested in the Netherlands just as the preliminary hearings in the trial against billionaire eugenicist Bill Gates and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla were getting underway. According to the report, van Kessel, who is one of two prosecutors working on the case, “was arrested after submitting key documents tied to the prosecution of Gates and Bourla. He was blindfolded, taken by military police, and is now being held in a maximum-security facility – without charges, and without access to his legal team or family. Sources inside the court say this wasn’t just a state overreach – it was an operation coordinated through the World Economic Forum in Davos, with direct influence from Gates, one of the defendants in the trial. And according to insiders, Van Kessel isn’t just being detained without charges. He’s the first non-compliant citizen undergoing a covert psychological program the elite have been developing for years – known in intelligence circles as reeducation… He’s now being held in the Netherlands’ highest-security prison, isolated from his family – and will remain there for at least three months. His official charge? Still unknown. Many suspect the state is scrambling to fabricate a crime. With Van Kessel silenced, the weight of the prosecution now falls on Peter Stassen alone. But if the arrest was meant to intimidate him, it failed spectacularly. With nothing left to lose, Stassen rose in court and named the crimes for what they are: biowarfare, genocide, mass murder, deceit, and assault… Inside, according to observers, the prosecution’s case against Bill Gates and Albert Bourla was described as ‘a bullseye.’ But as expected, the defense – made up of eight of Europe’s most expensive lawyers – came out swinging. They’ve been accused of playing fast and loose with the truth and are now aggressively working to block key witnesses against Gates and Bourla from taking the stand, including Dr. Mike Yeadon and Alexandra Latypova… Remember, Latypova is a former Big Pharma executive. Yeadon was a high-level scientist at Pfizer – he worked under Albert Bourla himself. These aren’t fringe voices – these are insiders with firsthand knowledge of how the system was weaponized. They have the documents. They have the timelines. And in a fair trial, they have everything needed to put Bourla – and possibly Gates – exactly where they belong.”

Image taken from the linked People’s Voice article.

• Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo holds a press conference in Tampa, Florida to call for the acknowledgement and further research into COVID-19 vaccine-related injuries. He also praised RFK for lifting the COVID vaccine recommendation for healthy children and pregnant women – an announcement Ladapo made to the citizens of Florida three years ago… During the presser he described the COVID clot shots as “products that should not be going into human beings,” adding, “When was the last time that you had a vaccine that literally almost every single person knows someone who had a bad reaction from it? I’ve been a physician with my MD since 2011. I’ve taken care of many, many, many patients. I have seen, until this pandemic, I mean, I could not tell you someone I knew individually who I was confident that was actually injured from a vaccine. Now, there are very few people that I run into who either themselves have not had a bad reaction from these mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, or who don’t know someone who’s had a bad reaction to these vaccines. They are terrible vaccines.” If you don’t have the 30 minutes to watch the presser, here is an excellent breakdown published at the Brownstone Institute website. Also see this.
• In an pharmaceutical advertisement article published at NBC News, authors Shreya Srinivasan and Berkeley Lovelace Jr. are surprisingly subdued in their attempt to fear monger over the recent “uptick” in COVID cases, and promote the use of mRNA gene therapy drugs for high-risk groups. However, the continued inclusion of pregnant women on the high-risk list remains a sore spot for me. Until COVID, it was not common practice to vaccinate women who were pregnant due to the risk of a systemic adverse reaction that could jeopardize the baby – which was proven by a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine on June 17, 2021 in regard to the COVID vaccine. In analyzing that study, I wrote in part, “… [there was] an 82% rate of ‘spontaneous abortions’ in women who received COVID jabs in either the first or second trimester of their pregnancy. The study’s authors, however, dishonestly present misleading figures in an attempt to make the ‘vaccine’ appear safer than it actually is. By using the total number of women who participated in the study (827) as the denominator, and the total number of spontaneous abortions that occurred (104) as the numerator, they are able to conclude that 12.6% of the pregnancies ended abruptly after the mother took the jab – which is horrible in and of itself. The 700 women who received the jab in their third trimester could not technically have a spontaneous abortion because they were already past the 20 week threshold. When you remove them from the equation and use 104 as the numerator (number of spontaneous abortions) and 127 as the denominator (number of women in their first or second trimester) you get a rate of 82%, which is quite alarming.” To make matters worse, on April 10th, 2025, I wrote about how it now appears the underlying data used in the 2021 study may have been destroyed after Dr. Tom Shimabukuro, one of the doctors who worked on the study, failed to produce these records in order to comply with a subpoena issued by Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) as part of a broader safety inquiry into the COVID “vaccines.” When a doctor is unable (or perhaps unwilling) to share and explain the scientific data they used to declare the use of a drug safe, this should be considered a major red flag. Also see this.

July 18 – Great news: RFK announces the US has rejected the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) put forward by the World Health Organization, posting on X, “The proposed amendments to the [IHR] open the door to the kind of narrative management, propaganda, and censorship that we saw during the COVID pandemic. The United States can cooperate with other nations without jeopardizing our civil liberties, without undermining our Constitution, and without ceding away America’s treasured sovereignty.” Kennedy elaborates on our government’s reasoning in a 5-minute video contained in the post. Also see this.

• FBI Director Kash Patel announces the agency has indicted 70 individuals for their involvement in the $250M COVID fraud scheme busted back in 2022, with 38 now having pleaded guilty.

July 19 – A study is published in the International Dental Journal titled, “National Pharmacovigilance Assessment of Oral Adverse Events Following COVID-19 Vaccination in Germany (2020-2023).” Researchers analyzed 975K adverse event reports submitted to the Federal Ministry of Health between December 2020 and December 2023 and found 21 oral health issues linked to the COVID “vaccine.” These conditions, which were reported at a much higher rate than expected in both Germany and the US include loss of taste (18x more likely), complete loss of taste (16x more likely), numb teeth (10x more likely), extreme tooth sensitivity (9x more likely), canker sores (4.5x more likely – 5.9x in children), numb mouth (8x more likely), swelling around the mouth (3.7x more likely) and swollen tongue (3x more), among others. 

To account for this, the authors wrote, “Bahri et al proposed several alternative hypotheses to explain postvaccination anosmia [loss of smell] and ageusia [loss of taste] instead of attributing them to the nocebo effect. One hypothesis suggests that partial demyelination [damage to the coating that protects nerve fibers] of taste-related neural pathways may impair gustatory function [this basically means identifying tastes], similar to its proposed role in anosmia. Another hypothesis attributes gustatory dysfunction to vaccine-induced inflammation in the oral neuroepithelium [lining around taste buds], leading to transient sensory impairment. In addition, direct interaction between vaccine-induced spike proteins and taste receptors or immune-mediated damage to gustatory cells has been suggested as a potential mechanism.” They also suggested the possibility of “increased reporting of AEs [adverse events] when a medical intervention, such as a vaccine or drug, gains heightened public attention, media coverage, or regulatory scrutiny, leading to a disproportionate perception of its risk.” Hat tip to Nic Hulscher.

July 20 – Writing at the Forgotten Side of Medicine Substack, A Midwestern Doctor publishes a lengthy article titled, “Where Does the CDC’s Pervasive Dishonesty Come From?” The article goes a long way in explaining why a growing segment of the American people have lost faith in their medical institutions. Check it out if you can find the time.

July 23 – HHS announces it has adopted ACIP’s recommendation to remove thimerosal from all seasonal flu vaccines. According to the press release, “[t]he effort to remove mercury from childhood vaccines began in 1999 when the U.S. Public Health Service, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and vaccine manufacturers jointly agreed that any potential risk from mercury warranted its removal as soon as possible. This marks the final step to remove mercury from all vaccines given to Americans. Secretary Kennedy’s newly appointed ACIP members broke with long-standing inaction by voting to remove mercury entirely from all influenza vaccines, fulfilling the 1999 pledge and aligning U.S. policy with that of Europe, which phased out mercury additives years ago. Vaccine manufacturers have confirmed they have the capacity to replace multi-dose vials containing mercury, ensuring the Vaccines for Children (VFC) program and adult vaccine supplies will remain uninterrupted.”

• Fortune Magazine reports founder and former chair of the World Economic Forum (WEF), Klaus Schwab, had his hand in the WEF cookie jar (along with his wife) to the tune of over $1M in “questionable expenses,” according to the preliminary findings of an investigation launched earlier this year. Author Lily Mae Lazarus writes in part, “[t]he probe, conducted by Swiss law firm Homburger and reportedly overseen by WEF’s board of trustees, noted upwards of $1.1 million in questionable travel expenses filed by Schwab and his wife, Hilde. Many of the expenses covered the couple’s first-class tickets for Forum-related business. Hilde, however, has no formal role at the organization and was allegedly simply accompanying her husband… Investigators also noted approximately $63,000 allocated for the Schwab’s travel to Venice, Miami, the Seychelles and other luxury destinations. The most recent of these trips was a week-long stay in Morocco from late December 2024 to early January 2025. These specific travel expenses reportedly had little or no evidence of any connection to the Forum… Investigators also noted Schwab and his wife used a driver paid by WEF on certain vacations and billed the organization for their land line and the cell phone used by their maid in Geneva. Other benefits enjoyed by the couple were expensed to WEF but not reported on income statements, the probe found… Other concerns stemmed from work conducted on a luxury property owned by WEF called Villa Mundi, located on Switzerland’s Lake Geneva. Investigators say the Schwabs hired a design firm they had used personally in 2019 to perform costly refurbishments on the property’s interior. Then, they allege, Hilde largely used the WEF property for private use, investigators found… The report further detailed several gifts allegedly received by Schwab, including Russian tea sets, personalized Tiffany cufflinks, and fur coats, said to be in violation of the organization’s policies.” So he gets all that, and what do we get? Well, as you likely already know, we get to eat ze bugs!

Klaus Schwab once did an interview with a Lenin bust sitting on a shelf behind him…

July 25 – A preprint study is published at Preprints.org titled, “Synthetic mRNA Vaccines and Transcriptomic Dysregulation: Evidence from New-Onset Adverse Events and Cancers Post-Vaccination.” According to Nic Hulscher, one of the doctors involved with the study, researchers used “high-resolution RNA sequencing of blood samples and differential gene expression analysis [and] found that COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ severely disrupted the expression of thousands of genes – inducing mitochondrial failure, immune system reprogramming, and oncogenic activation that persisted for months to years after injection… Both vaccine injured groups showed massive gene dysregulation compared to healthy controls – hundreds of genes up- or down-regulated, especially in pathways tied to: mitochondrial dysfunction, protein folding and degradation stress (proteasome pathways), ribosomal overload and nonsense-mediated decay (NMD), chronic systemic inflammation, oncogenic activation (MYC) and tumor suppressor suppression…

To our knowledge, this is the first study to show long-term genetic disruption in individuals harmed by the COVID-19 mRNA injections. These findings strongly suggest: mRNA vaccines can induce gene expression profiles consistent with tumor formation and chronic disease, mRNA-vaccinated individuals may be at heightened risk of cancer, immune dysfunction, and inflammatory disorders, the synthetic mRNA and long-lasting spike protein appear to create sustained cellular stress that disrupts normal genetic regulation, [and] signatures suggest potential reverse transcription of vaccine mRNA and persistence of plasmid DNA – raising concern for long-term transcriptional interference or possible genomic integration.” Update (8/2/25): Dr. John Catanzaro, CEO of Neo7Bioscience and senior author of this study, joins Nic Hulscher on his Focal Points podcast to discuss the science behind mRNA-induced genetic disruption.

Update (9/11/25): Preprints.org withdraws and removes the study from their website without any explanation other than it was done “at the request of Advisory Board in line with the withdrawal policy (https://www.preprints.org/instructions-for-authors#withdrawal-policy).” According to Nic Hulscher, “The retraction of our preprint wasn’t about ethics. This was about silencing a study that revealed mRNA ‘vaccines’ induce transcriptomic chaos across thousands of genes. When one of the world’s most-read preprints can be erased at the whim of the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex, open science is dead. If preprints can be censored, the façade of ‘scientific debate’ has collapsed into a regime of control. The study is not going away. As it undergoes peer-review at a reputable journal, you can still access it on ResearchGate. We will continue to fight for scientific truth, no matter the cost.”

• The London Telegraph reports the “Covid vaccines saved far fewer lives than first thought, a major new analysis has concluded… In 2024, the World Health Organisation (WHO) claimed that jabs prevented the deaths of 14.4 million globally in the first year alone, with some estimates putting the figure closer to 20 million. However, new modelling by Stanford University and Italian researchers suggests that while the vaccine did undoubtedly save lives, the true figure is ‘substantially more conservative’ and closer to 2.5 million worldwide over the course of the entire pandemic… Overall 5,400 people needed to be vaccinated to save one life but in the under-30s this figure rose to 100,000 jabs.. Since 2021, more than 13 billion Covid-19 vaccine doses have been administered. But there have been mounting concerns that vaccines could be harmful for some people, particularly the young, and that the risk was not worth the benefit for a population at little risk from Covid… The team believes earlier modelling may have used overly pessimistic infection fatality rates and overly optimistic vaccine effectiveness, while failing to consider how quickly protection waned.” While this admission is definitely a step in the right direction – especially since it’s coming from a well-known and respected institution like Stanford – it does not account for other studies that estimate deaths in the tens of millions due to government treatment protocols and deadly “vaccines.” Also check out this breakdown of the study to understand why it’s “turtles all the way down.”

July 27 – The American Medical Association (AMA) writes an open letter to RFK to express their “deep concern” over reports that he intends to remove all members of the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). The letter reads in part, “USPSTF plays a critical [lie], non-partisan [lie] role in guiding physicians’ efforts to prevent disease [lie] and improve the health [lie] of patients by helping to ensure access to evidence-based [lie] clinical preventive services. As such, we urge you to retain the previously appointed members of the USPSTF and commit to the long-standing process of regular meetings to ensure their important [lie] work can continue without interruption. The USPSTF has long played an essential role in making evidence-based [lie] recommendations for clinical prevention of disease. USPSTF members have been selected through an open, public nomination process and are nationally recognized experts [medical cartel members] in primary care, prevention [lie] and evidence-based [lie] medicine.” Well, according to this evidence-based website, the AMA is a big part of the problem. Also see this.

July 28 – Just because it’s a Monday, RFK takes to X to denounce our nation’s Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, writing in part, “[t]he 1986 Vaccine Act gave vaccine makers immunity against lawsuits by children who suffer vaccine injuries. The statute, and numerous subsequent court decisions, recognized that vaccines, like all medicines, are, in the words of the American Academy of Pediatrics case, ‘unavoidably unsafe,’ and that a percentage of vaccinated children will suffer injuries or death. Congress, therefore, simultaneously created the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), which obliged HHS to compensate injured children… Under the VICP, vaccine victims can petition for compensation to the so-called ‘Vaccine Court,’ which pays out awards from a trust fund endowed by a 75-cent surcharge on every vaccine. Congress intended that injured children be compensated ‘quickly and fairly’ for injuries, ‘either presumed or proven to be causally connected to vaccines,’ with doubts about causation resolved in favor of the victim.

To date, the Vaccine Court has paid out $5.4 billion to 12,000 petitioners. But the VICP no longer functions to achieve its Congressional intent. Instead, the VICP has devolved into a morass of inefficiency, favoritism, and outright corruption as government lawyers and the Special Masters who serve as Vaccine Court judges prioritize the solvency of the HHS Trust Fund, over their duty to compensate victims. The structure itself hobbles claimants. The defendant is HHS, not the vaccine makers; and claimants are therefore facing the monumental power and bottomless pockets of the U.S. government represented by the Department of Justice. Furthermore, most of the Special Masters come from government, legal, or political posts, and typically display an extreme bias that favors the government side. There is no discovery, and the rules of evidence do not apply. The government lawyers do not allow children’s attorneys access to the Vaccine Safety Datalink, a taxpayer-funded CDC surveillance system that houses the best data on vaccine injuries…

The VICP routinely dismisses meritorious cases outright or drags them out for years. Instead of ‘quickly and fairly’ awarding compensation, Special Masters dismiss over half of the cases. Most of those that proceed typically take 5+ years to resolve, with many languishing for more than 10 years as parents struggle to care for children suffering with often extreme disabilities… The VICP is broken, and I intend to fix it. I will not allow the VICP to continue to ignore its mandate and fail its mission of quickly and fairly compensating vaccine-injured individuals. I am grateful to be working with @AGPamBondi and HHS staff to fix the VISP. Together, we will steer the Vaccine Court back to its original Congressional intent.” Who in their right mind could think this man is the bad guy? Oh yeah, braindead Democrats. That’s who.

• The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) issues a policy statement calling for the end of non-medical vaccine exemptions for schoolchildren as they are “contrary to optimal individual and public health.” Doesn’t this really mean vaccines don’t work? If Mrs. Smith’s children are vaccinated, then they’re protected, right? Why then is Mrs. Jones forced to vaccinate her kids in order to protect Mrs. Smith’s? Unsurprisingly, the AAP offered no evidence to back up their claims, just modeling and other assumptions. In his criticism of the policy statement, Steve Kirsch points out, “the ‘protect the vulnerable’ argument is used to override individual choice and bodily autonomy, even when the actual risk is not transparently quantified, the policy conflates the theoretical risk to a small subset of medically fragile children with a blanket justification for universal mandates, [and] it ignores the reality that many of the most vulnerable (e.g., immunocompromised) are at risk from all infectious diseases, not just those targeted by vaccines, and that exclusionary policies can harm these children by denying them access to social environments.” The people who claim they are trying to protect children are just as full of shit as those who claim to be protecting democracy. Also see this.

July 30 – “Inside the Vaccine Trials” is released on YouTube. The documentary film (backup) tells the story of several people who were severely injured by the COVID “vaccine” and how they were essentially ignored after their injuries occurred. The film includes interview segments with attorney Aaron Siri and Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson, among others, who discuss how the “vaccines” were improperly tested before being rushed to market. The film is only 70 minutes and well-worth the time.

• President Trump announces the creation of a new “digital health ecosystem.” This new plan will allow Americans – by choice – to share their health records with major tech companies like Google and Amazon in an effort to make them more accessible, and to allow their health to be tracked in real time. The program, while appealing to some, does not come without privacy concerns – though I’m not exactly sure what I’m supposed to be concerned about. For example, in their reporting about this announcement, the Associated Presstitutes wrote in part, “The system, spearheaded by an administration that has already freely shared highly personal data about Americans in ways that have tested legal bounds [the article they link to is about ICE being given Medicaid records to help them track down illegal aliens – I know, the horror], could put patients’ desires for more convenience at their doctor’s office on a collision course with their expectations that their medical information be kept private [will they elaborate?]. ‘There are enormous ethical and legal concerns,’ said Lawrence Gostin, a Georgetown University law professor who specializes in public health. ‘Patients across America should be very worried that their medical records are going to be used in ways that harm them and their families [nope, that was it].’” So the Presstitutes are happy to report that you and your family might be “harmed” by this new initiative, but then they don’t tell you what that would look like or how to avoid it. Regardless, this non-specific concern was then picked up by NBC and others, who just ran the AP story without wondering for themselves what exactly they should be concerned about… To me, this seems more about modernization than anything else, and people do not need to participate in the program if they don’t want to – at least not yet. Including Gostin’s quote in the article was likely done to appease the AP readers still suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome who require something negative about President Trump or his administration in every article they read or they won’t find it credible.
• During an appearance on News Nation, Marty Makary continues to change the narrative on the origin of COVID, telling host Connell McShane, “The way it used to be. We’re planning to change our health agencies for a generation or longer. Look at the NIH. When J. Bhattacharya came in there, it was a mess. Fourteen percent of the grants were descriptive studies on health equity. And the NIH had just funded a lab that brewed up a virus that killed 20 million people worldwide. So they’re getting back to studying root causes, a cure for cancer, debilitating neurodegenerative diseases, and they’re going to do good work… And so we’re going to institute teamwork and break up the fiefdom culture within the agency.” Godspeed, Dr. Makary. Godspeed.

July 31 – Legal Newsline reports, “[today] a full panel of the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned an earlier ruling from their colleagues, declaring now that the L.A. Unified School District (LAUSD) didn’t violate the constitutional rights of workers who were fired after they refused to get Covid shots. In the ruling, the court’s majority refused to consider evidence that the so-called Covid vaccines actually immunized anyone against contracting or spreading the virus that caused Covid-19. Instead, the majority said it mattered only that the government declared the shots were ‘effective in preventing and spreading the disease.’ They grounded the ruling in the longstanding U.S. Supreme Court decision known as Jacobson v Massachusetts. That decision, which authorized Massachusetts public health officials to force vaccine skeptics to receive smallpox inoculations in 1905, has been used by governments ever since to enforce vaccine mandates… ‘Whether a vaccine protects the public’s health and safety is committed to policymakers, not a court or a jury. Further, alleged scientific uncertainty over a vaccine’s efficacy is irrelevant under Jacobson. Jacobson simply does not allow debate in the courts over whether a mandated vaccine prevents the spread of disease. Jacobson makes clear that it is up to the political branches, within the parameters of rational basis review, to decide whether a vaccine effectively protects public health and safety,’ the majority wrote.”

When the case first hit the Ninth Circuit, a three-judge panel not only rejected LAUSD’s motion to dismiss the appeal of the fired employees, but accused the district of “tactically manipulating” the federal court system by rescinding and reinstating their COVID vaccine mandate several times in an effort to render the appeal moot. Going even further, they decided by a 2-1 margin that COVID “vaccines” may need to be categorized differently than “traditional vaccines” because they did not prevent recipients from being infected or spreading COVID, saying Jacobson should not apply in this case as the district has never provided evidence of the jab “effectively” preventing the spread of COVID. However, when the COVID cult members on the roster of the Ninth Circuit got wind of the decision, they tossed it, claimed their colleagues had made a mistake, and directed the case to be re-argued “en banc” in front of a full 11-judge panel. Lo and behold, the en banc majority then found the district had been “more than reasonable” in their enforcement of the mandate, claiming the COVID jabs “lessen the severity of symptoms” for those who catch it (supposedly), and that this alone was enough to force everyone to take it, writing in part, “We reject Plaintiffs’ attempt to limit Jacobson to only those vaccines that prevent the spread of a disease and provide immunity.” So even though the COVID “vaccines” are not real vaccines, and even though they do not stop the spread of COVID, the Ninth Circuit essentially ruled people will need to take it anyway, just because some power-tripping, unscientific leftist douchebag says so – and the dissenting judges took note of this. In their dissenting opinion they wrote in part, “If we accept the majority’s holding that a state can impose a vaccine mandate just to ‘lessen the severity of symptoms’ of sick persons – without considering whether it lessens transmission and contraction of this disease – then we are opening the door for compulsory medical treatment against people’s wishes. Vaccines, by definition, build immunity and prevent transmission and contraction of an infectious disease, but we risk blurring the line between vaccines and medical treatment if vaccines are defined as anything that lessens symptoms.” Which is exactly what they want to do… The COVID cult must be stopped.

• More good news: According to the Associated Presstitutes, “U.S. health officials have told more than a half-dozen of the nation’s top medical organizations that they will no longer help establish vaccination recommendations. The government told the organizations [today] via email that their experts are being disinvited from the workgroups that have been the backbone of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. The organizations include the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Infectious Diseases Society of America… One email said the organizations are ‘special interest groups and therefore are expected to have a “bias” based on their constituency and/or population that they represent.’” I’m sure this has something to do with the letter the AMA wrote to RFK a few days ago… and I absolutely love it! Update (8/1/25): In response to being notified they will no longer have influence over the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, “eight medical association liaison organizations” release a joint statement. The message reads in part, “[w]e are deeply disappointed and alarmed that our organizations are being characterized as ‘biased’ and therefore barred from reviewing scientific data and informing the development of vaccine recommendations that have long helped ensure our nation’s vaccine program is safe, effective, and free from bias… To remove our deep medical expertise from this vital and once transparent process is irresponsible, dangerous to our nation’s health, and will further undermine public and clinician trust in vaccines.” These are the groups that have been recommending COVID “vaccines” for young children and pregnant women, so to say they’re “biased” would be an understatement. In my opinion, words like “sick” or “deranged” or “death cult” would be far more accurate.
• Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel informs his employees the company will be reducing its global workforce by 10% by the end of the year, bringing the total number of employees below 5,000. The company had already planned a $1.5B reduction in R&D investments over the next couple of years in addition to other cutbacks, but apparently those efforts were not enough. Also see this.
• John Leake publishes an article at the Focal Points Substack titled, “Beating Back the Trolls.” Leake writes in part, “Our new book, Vaccines: Mythology, Ideology, and Reality, has only been out for 48 hours and it’s already been attacked on Amazon by two brain-dead vaccine propaganda trolls… Reviewer DG reveals he is in the grip of vaccine ideology by repeatedly referring to ‘science’ as though it’s a fixed entity, and not an ongoing process of discovery advanced through questioning, discussion, and debate. Like many mendacious people, reviewer Bodisat projects onto us and our book what he himself is doing – that is, falsely categorizing it. The book is not a work of fiction, but a meticulously researched work of investigative scholarship with 291 citations. I will gladly debate any of today’s Vaccine High Priests – Paul Offit, Peter Hotez, Anthony Fauci or anyone else – about the book’s content. I doubt any of them has the guts to debate me, never mind my co-author, Dr. Peter McCullough. I dare say I’d mop the floor with any of them. Please help us to beat back the trolls by giving the book a brief review.” I have not yet read the book, but it is on my list. Update (8/1/25): Leake provides an update in another piece titled, “The Burial of the Trolls.” He was very happy to share that they woke up to 100 5-star reviews!