January 2 – The UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) approves zapomeran (Kostaive), an experimental, self-replicating mRNA COVID vaccine made by Arcturus Therapeutics. According to the MHRA press release, “[v]ery common side effects (which may affect more than 1 in 10 people) include pain or tenderness at the injection site, tiredness, chills, fever, muscle and joint pain, headache and dizziness. Most side effects are mild and disappear within a few days of vaccination.” However, as Nic Hulscher points out, the trial data shows 90% of the participants experienced adverse events, with 75% reporting systemic reactions and 15% needing medical attention after the first dose.
A separate study conducted in Uganda and released in May of 2025 also showed troubling results as 39 of the 42 healthy participants experienced “grade 3 or higher laboratory abnormalities,” though the authors claimed, “[n]one of the grade 3 or higher clinical AEs [adverse events] or laboratory abnormalities were attributed to the vaccine.”
Image: source
January 3 – A study is published in Oncotarget titled, “COVID vaccination and post-infection cancer signals: Evaluating patterns and potential biological mechanisms.” After conducting a search through multiple databases for COVID-related cancer cases written about between January 2020 and October 2025, researchers found 66 case reports (articles), 69 peer-reviewed publications, and 2 population-level cohort studies that identified 333 individual cancer cases occurring in 27 countries. Among COVID vaccine-associated cases, lymphoma was the most common (43%). Approximately 50% of the diagnoses occurred within 2-4 weeks of vaccination, with some occurring within 7-14 days, and others emerging after 2-6 months.
The researchers also provided three hypotheses regarding the mechanisms by which tumor growth is promoted by the COVID vaccine: 1) immune system dysregulation due to cytokine storms which results in an impairment of the body’s cancer surveillance system, 2) spike proteins directly interfering with the body’s natural tumor suppressors, and 3) genomic integration of residual DNA contained in the vaccine, including SV40, and the enhanced cellular uptake caused by the lipid nano particles they are contained in. At the time of publication, Oncotarget was unable to upload the study into its journal index because of “malicious cyberattacks.” The journal’s statement on the matter is pictured below…
According to Nic Hulscher, this is the first time “a major cancer journal has consolidated what many clinicians, pathologists, and researchers have already recognized and placed it permanently into the peer-reviewed scientific record. At this point, continued refusal by federal health agencies to acknowledge these signals represents criminal negligence. Equally grave are the journal’s public disclosures that its servers were subjected to malicious cyberattacks possibly linked to PubPeer members, which have interfered with access to this published study.” Check out the linked Hulscher article for a more detailed breakdown of the Oncotarget study. Also see this.
Image taken from the linked study.
Image taken from the linked study.
Image: source
January 5 – The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces (long overdue) changes to the childhood vaccine schedule. According to the decision memo, “[t]he recommended schedule [for all children] includes consensus vaccines for measles, mumps, rubella, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, Haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib), pneumococcal disease, human papillomavirus (HPV), and varicella [chickenpox]. This vaccine schedule reflects the Danish schedule except that this revised schedule adds the varicella vaccine, which is not currently on the Danish schedule.” The new vaccine schedule now includes around 30 vaccine doses, a reduction of approximately 55 additional injections. 55! As you would expect, the usual cast of ghouls and pharma lackeys are stomping their feet in disapproval and expressing outrage over the MAHA crew no longer allowing American children to be treated like Big Pharma pin cushions.
Image: source
Update (1/17/26): Steve Kirsch publishes the contents of a letter he wrote to the CEO of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), Mark Del Monte, requesting evidence supporting the childhood vaccination schedule they have been recommending. The letter reads in part, “[s]everal colleagues and I have been unable to identify a peer-reviewed study demonstrating a statistically significant net morbidity or all-cause mortality benefit attributable to the U.S. childhood vaccine schedule when evaluated as a bundled intervention. I would appreciate it if you could provide citations to any study – from the U.S. or internationally – that evaluates a full childhood vaccination schedule using individual-level outcome data and demonstrates an overall health or mortality benefit… multiple pediatric practices that follow reduced or no-vaccination approaches report substantially lower rates of chronic childhood conditions compared with nearby conventional practices. Are you aware of any documented U.S. counter-examples in which non-vaccinating practices demonstrate worse aggregate health outcomes? Because these two questions directly relate to the evidentiary basis of national immunization policy, I believe they are relevant to ACIP’s ongoing deliberations. I am copying several ACIP committee members so any information you provide can be shared transparently… For clarity, by ‘credible outcome study’ I mean one that includes: individual-level (record-level) data, appropriate positive and negative controls, [and] statistically significant net benefit across overall health or mortality outcomes.” As Kirsch points out, AAP will meet his request with silence, not science…
Update 2 (1/26/26): In response to the sensible changes made by the CDC, the AAP releases its own vaccine schedule. According to AAP president and crybaby Andrew Racine, “[t]his is the exact same recommendation that we’ve had along, the same recommendations the federal government used to agree with. Nothing has changed. The science[™] hasn’t changed. The distribution of these illnesses hasn’t changed. The risk to the children of the United States hasn’t changed, and so the vaccine schedule hasn’t changed.” Despite the claims of vaccine zealots like Racine, the changes made to the childhood vaccine changes are not putting children at risk, and are supported by data. To be clear, any fear or apprehension being felt by parents is the direct result of the Big Pharma-funded propaganda being spewed by soulless mainstream media pigs and pharma lackeys like Racine. Also see this.
January 6 – Reuters reports Bayer’s Monsanto has “sued COVID-19 vaccine makers Pfizer, BioNTech and Moderna in [a] Delaware federal court… for allegedly misusing its messenger RNA technology in manufacturing their vaccines… The patent infringement lawsuits [allege] the companies copied technology developed by Monsanto in the 1980s for strengthening mRNA in crops in order to stabilize the genetic material used in their vaccines… Bayer separately filed a similar lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson in New Jersey federal court on Tuesday, arguing that a DNA-based process J&J used in manufacturing its shots infringed the patent… Bayer’s complaints add to a web of patent lawsuits over the blockbuster COVID shots, which include an ongoing lawsuit filed by Moderna against Pfizer in 2022. Bayer was not involved in developing COVID vaccines and does not make or sell any version of them. It asked the courts for an unspecified amount of monetary damages and said it was not seeking to block the companies from manufacturing their vaccines.” Also see this.
January 7 – The Department of Health and Human Services and the US Department of Agriculture release a new set of dietary guidelines for Americans. The food pyramid is now inverted, with proteins, fats and dairy at the top along with fruits and vegetables, and whole grains at the bottom. Overall, the recommendations seem very common sense, and not much different from what most people eat when maintaining a healthy diet. Also see this and this.
The 10-page document reads in part, “[t]o Make America Healthy Again, we must return to the basics. American households must prioritize diets built on whole, nutrient-dense foods – protein, dairy, vegetables, fruits, healthy fats, and whole grains. Paired with a dramatic reduction in highly processed foods laden with refined carbohydrates, added sugars, excess sodium, unhealthy fats, and chemical additives, this approach can change the health trajectory for so many Americans. The United States is amid a health emergency. Nearly 90% of health care spending goes to treating people who have chronic diseases. Many of these illnesses are not genetic destiny; they are the predictable result of the Standard American Diet – a diet which, over time, has become reliant on highly processed foods and coupled with a sedentary lifestyle. The consequences have been devastating. More than 70% of American adults are overweight or obese. Nearly one in three American adolescents between the ages of 12 and 17 has prediabetes… This changes today. We are realigning our food system to support American farmers, ranchers, and companies who grow and produce real food – and the Trump administration is working to ensure all families can afford it… Under President Trump’s leadership, we are restoring common sense, scientific integrity, and accountability to federal food and health policy – and we are reclaiming the food pyramid and returning it to its true purpose of educating and nourishing all Americans. These Guidelines call on every American to eat more real food… America’s future depends on what we grow, what we serve, and what we choose to eat.”
In response to the new guidelines, Vice President JD Vance took to X to crack wise and plug a Cincinnati, Ohio-based ice cream company…
HHS Secretary Robert Kennedy played along, and sent back a hilarious message which included the very popular JD Vance meme depicting him as fat with long curly hair…
One of my favorite things about the Trump 2.0 administration is that they like to have fun…
Update (1/11/26): RFK joins Maria Bartiromo on Sunday Morning Futures to discuss the new dietary guidelines.
- The White House publishes a Presidential Memoranda titled, “Withdrawing the United States from International Organizations, Conventions, and Treaties that Are Contrary to the Interests of the United States.” The move breaks ties with 66 foreign NGOs, UN political initiatives and climate agreements.
January 12 – The New York Post reports Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA) and Congressman Paul Gosar (R-AZ) have started calling for NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya to cut off $3M in grant funding for a Colorado State University research program which involves bat research and studying SARS-related coronaviruses. The “objectives” section of the grant summary on usaspending.gov reads in part, “[t]o expand and improve biomedical research and research training in infectious diseases and related areas; to conduct developmental research, to produce and test research materials. To assist public, private and commercial institutions to conduct developmental research, to produce and test research materials, to provide research services as required by the agency for programs in infectious diseases, and controlling disease caused by infectious or parasitic agents, allergic and immunologic diseases and related areas. Projects range from studies of microbial physiology and antigenic structure to collaborative trials of experimental drugs and vaccines, mechanisms of resistance to antibiotics as well as research dealing with epidemiological observations in hospitalized patients or community populations and progress in allergic and immunologic diseases.” Also see this.
January 13 – A study is published in the Journal of Independent Medicine titled, “RNA:DNA Hybrids Survive Digestion in mRNA Vaccine Manufacturing.” Back on September 6th, 2025, three doctors published a study revealing the COVID clot shots they tested contained “billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose in the modRNA COVID-19 products tested… all products tested exceeded the guidelines for residual DNA set by the FDA and WHO of 10ng/dose by 36-627-fold.” This new study explains how regulators could have “missed” the DNA contamination in the first place… According to the Independent Medical Alliance, “[d]uring mRNA vaccine production, DNA templates are used to generate the mRNA. That DNA is supposed to be destroyed afterward using an enzyme called DNase I. But… DNase I cannot effectively digest DNA that has bonded with RNA to form what scientists call RNA:DNA hybrids. And those hybrids form inevitably during production… The modifications made to the vaccine mRNA (specifically, N1-methylpseudouridine substitutions) make these bonds particularly strong and stable. Standard DNase I treatment degrades the exposed portions of the plasmid DNA but leaves these hybrid regions largely intact…
“The problem: regulatory testing typically targets a region of the plasmid called the KAN (kanamycin resistance) gene – a region that is susceptible to DNase I digestion. By measuring only this region and extrapolating to estimate total DNA, regulators systematically underestimate contamination… The study also tested an alternative enzyme, DNase I-XT, which is specifically designed to digest RNA:DNA hybrids. It achieved 100 to 1,000 times more effective degradation of spike-region DNA compared to standard DNase I – demonstrating that the contamination can be removed with the right tools…
“The mechanism the study identifies isn’t new to science. BioNTech’s own researchers published a paper in 2024 acknowledging that DNase I is at least 100-fold less effective against RNA:DNA hybrids. The appropriate enzyme exists. The problem was documented… [The authors] note that the commercial vaccines were manufactured using a different process than what was used during clinical trials. The trial material used PCR-generated DNA templates; the commercial product switched to E. coli-based plasmid manufacturing. This introduced not only the RNA:DNA hybrid problem but also bacterial methylation patterns… They also raise questions about biological consequences. Long DNA fragments containing functional promoters could potentially express proteins if taken up by cells – which McKernan suggests may help explain reports of persistent spike protein expression in some patients.” The linked breakdown article also includes an interesting 26-minute discussion between two of the study’s authors, Dr. Jessica Rose and Dr. Kevin McKernan, in which they explain their findings.
- Paul Thacker publishes an article at his Substack titled, “The Office of Research Integrity Should Investigate Nature Medicine’s Corrupt ‘Proximal Origins’ Paper.” According to messages and a congressional investigation, Jeremy Farrar – who is currently a chief scientist at the World Health Organization and the former director of the UK’s Wellcome Trust – should have been listed as an author of the now-infamous “proximal origins” article published in Nature on March 17th, 2020. Because he was not (neither was The Twerp), “failing to cite an author meets the criteria for plagiarism, one of the three types of research misconduct currently defined by federal law.” Former NIH director Francis Collins also confirmed this to be the case in a 2011 letter he wrote to Thacker after Thacker had shared his “concern about financial conflicts of interest and ghostwriting in academia…” Back in April of 2025, NBC reported US attorney Ed Martin had been sending letters to various medical journals to inquire about their editorial practices and standards… It looks like a letter to Nature is long past due.
January 14 – The Daily Caller reports on newly released documents showing The Twerp, Francis Collins, and several Biden administration miscreants including former CDC director Rochelle Walensky and former surgeon general Vivek Murthy were aware of a large study out of Israel showing recovery from a natural COVID infection provided better immunity than the vaccines they were simultaneously looking to mandate… On August 27th, 2021, just three days after a Department of Defense memo directed the secretaries of the armed forces to begin vaccinating all members of the military and national guard, Dr. Fauci wrote an email to several people describing the Israeli data as “impressive.” The email reads in part, “The data as reported in the news article look rather impressive despite the caveat that it is a retrospective study and the testing was voluntary. I have not seen the details of the actual data, but I would imagine that it is more complicated than we think… However, it is conceivable and possibly likely that those who have had a serious systemic infection develop a high level of immunity that even surpasses that of full vaccination.” Three days later, Collins would chime in on the email chain, describing the study results as “somewhat puzzling,” while also acknowledging it appeared to be “well-designed,” and asking, “[m]ost of us have been saying up until now that vaccines are actually better for providing immunity – what does the overall synthesis of the data now say?” It says you people suck, Francis…
The documents were obtained by a watchdog group called Protect the Public’s Trust through a Freedom of Information Act request. The organization’s director, Michael Chamberlain told the Daily Caller, “What does it say about our own institutions that, despite billions spent every year, Americans had to rely on Israeli research for their health information, and that our own officials tried to bury what didn’t fit their preferred narrative? … There’s been a lot of handwringing about reforms and personnel actions by the new leadership at HHS, but this is just more evidence that the public health bureaucracy was ripe for a thorough housecleaning.”
January 19 – The World Economic Forum’s annual meeting gets underway in Davos, Switzerland. This year’s theme? “A Spirit of Dialogue.” Hopefully Trump rolls in there and dialogues all of them upside their elitist heads…
Update (1/23/26): The US was well represented at this year’s globalist confab, with President Trump, in particular, giving a great address in which he unapologetically defended American interests and criticized European leaders – to their faces – for allowing their countries to become weak. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer also did a nice job laying out America’s economic strategy in an address of his own and during a subsequent Q&A.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio also gave remarks during the formal establishment of the Board of Peace, which took place separately while world leaders came together for the Davos meeting.
Another bright spot from the confab was listening to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent roast and humiliate Commiefornia Governor Gavin Nuisance, who seemed to be there for no reason other than to undermine the Trump administration… When asked to comment about Newsom calling him “smug,” Bessent unloaded, saying (with a big smile on his face), “I think it’s very, very ironic that Governor Newsom, who strikes me as Patrick Bateman meets Sparkle Beach Ken, may be the only Californian who knows less about economics than Kamala Harris. He’s here this week with his billionaire sugar daddy, Alex Soros, and Davos is a perfect place for a man who when everyone else was on lockdown, when he was having people arrested for going to church, he was having thousand dollar a night meals at the French Laundry. And I’m sure the California people won’t forget that. And… my message to Governor Newsom is [that] the Trump administration is coming to California. We are going to crack down on waste, fraud, and abuse. And I was told he was asked to give a speech on his signature policies, but he’s not speaking because what have his economic policies brought? Outward migration from California, a gigantic budget deficit, the largest homeless population in America, and the poor folks in the Palisades who had their homes burned down. He is here hobnobbing with the global elite while his California citizens are still homeless. Shame on him. He is too smug, too self-absorbed, and too economically illiterate to know anything. Let me know if you need any further clarification.” Way to go, Scott!
As you would expect, Governor Nuisance was not happy… I should probably also point out that this jerkoff sells Donald Trump kneepads at his website for $100, and that any claims he makes about another person’s supposed impropriety should be taken with a grain of salt… or a dump truck full.
To read about “4 Takeaways” from the event according to the globalist WEF, see this.
January 20 – President Trump signs an executive order officially withdrawing the United States from the World Health Organization. The order outlines the organization’s failures during the COVID-19 scamdemic, its inability to reform, and the “unfairly onerous payments” they continue to demand from the US. According to Jon Fleetwood, however, the US will continue to engage with the organization yearly regarding influenza, writing in part, “the administration declined to rule out involvement in the WHO’s influenza strain-selection process, which determines the purported viral lineages used in seasonal vaccines worldwide and shapes pharmaceutical manufacturing timelines… despite the publicized WHO withdrawal, the United States remains functionally embedded in the WHO-centered influenza system – where global strain selection, federally funded virus engineering, and government-backed vaccine platforms converge inside the same international pandemic planning architecture.”
In their biased, anti-American reporting of the news, Reuters mentioned “[t]he U.S. flag had been removed from outside the WHO headquarters in Geneva on Thursday, according to witnesses.” Good bye and good luck…
Image: source
January 21 – Families and doctors, along with Children’s Health Defense, file a RICO complaint against the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) “for its central role in an enterprise that has defrauded American families about the safety of the childhood vaccine schedule for several decades.” The complaint reads in part, “AAP participates in an association-in-fact enterprise with vaccine manufacturers (including Pfizer, Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, and Sanofi Pasteur), aligned entities such as the American Board of Pediatrics, and key spokespersons including members of AAP’s Committee on Infectious Diseases. The enterprise’s common purpose is to maintain and expand vaccine uptake by assuring pediatricians, hospitals, parents, and policymakers that the schedule is categorically safe, while concealing material facts about the lack of testing, inadequacies in the vaccine safety monitoring programs, and financial incentives tied to vaccine schedule compliance… The AAP is the enterprise’s primary information distribution network. Its 67,000 members (virtually every pediatrician in America) deliver the enterprise’s safety claims directly to families as their own medical advice. Physicians who deviate face professional destruction…
“When the Department of Health and Human Services has attempted reform, AAP leads the opposition: it sued to restore the childhood COVID-19 vaccine recommendation after the CDC removed it and issued inflated statistics about the effects of the December 2025 ACIP hepatitis B decision. AAP and its enterprise associates’ lawsuit to derail the CDC’s January 5, 2026 announcement bringing its vaccine schedule more in line with other industrialized countries… is the latest evidence of its racketeering activities… The same pharmaceutical conglomerates that serve as enterprise participants in manufacturing childhood vaccines have systematically acquired companies treating the chronic conditions those vaccines cause, creating a closed-loop system that financializes childhood illness.” For a fuller breakdown of the 55-page lawsuit, see this (and this).
- During a Heritage Foundation event titled, “The Future of Biosafety: Confronting Gain-of-Function Research,” former CDC director Robert Redfield continued his COVID vaccine bashing tour… When asked (24:00 mark) why his opinion has changed regarding the mRNA vaccines which came to market via Operation Warp Speed while he was serving as CDC director, Redfield responded by saying, “Well, first Warp Speed was a very important success in the fact that we developed a therapeutic countermeasure. You have to remember in those days we were losing 3,000 to 5,000 people a day… I had a meeting with a very successful person in our government recently, and the first question he asked me was did I really think long COVID was real? And is COVID still the problem? And I – of course, my whole clinical practice is long COVID and vaccine reactions from the mRNA vaccines – and I looked it up again just to double check, and they said we’re still losing 285 people a day. So COVID’s still around, even though you may not see it on the front page of the newspaper. But when we had the COVID vaccine, at least we had something that could prevent and modify hospitalization and death in highly vulnerable people. The problem is not the science of creating the vaccine. The problem was the public policy and how to use the vaccine. The vaccine should have never been mandated. It wasn’t ever meant to prevent transmission. It didn’t prevent transmission. It probably was a misnomer to call it a vaccine. It’s really more like a medicine. It doesn’t stop infection. Children should have never been vaccinated. People shouldn’t have been mandated to be vaccinated to go to school and work. So, the policy side was totally misplayed… In my practice, I do have a significant number of people now with mRNA vaccine injuries that are quite significantly ill. Their lives have been totally disrupted.”
January 22 – ACIP Chair Kirk Milhoan makes an appearance on the “Why Should I Trust You?” podcast. The 75-minute interview was extremely insightful as Milhoan was given the opportunity to explain his approach to medicine, his philosophy regarding vaccines, his feelings about “established” science, the role ACIP plays in vaccine recommendation, and how the committee will function now that RFK has completely turned over its membership. Milhoan came across as not only very intelligent, but quite deliberative – a far cry from the pharma lackeys who had been helping the CDC make their official recommendations for decades.
I also feel I should commend the podcast’s four hosts, who were very respectful throughout the interview despite holding different views about vaccines and medicine. They did not treat him like a dangerous kook – the way he is often portrayed in the media – and asked good questions. I would highly recommend taking the time to give the interview a listen. Also check out this short article written by his wife, Kimberly.
Update (1/23/26): Leave it to the mainstream media to take what I would consider a fantastic interview and use it for the purpose of propaganda… In an article published at The Hill titled, “Chair of CDC’s vaccine panel questions need for polio vaccines, citing personal autonomy,” Big Pharma lackey Joseph Choi wrote in part, “[a]ppearing on the podcast ‘Why Should I Trust You?’ … Milhoan was asked to discuss how he views the efficacy and risk of vaccines like those for polio and measles, mumps and rubella (MMR). ‘As you look at polio, we need to not be afraid to consider that we are in a different time now than we were then,’ he said. ‘Our sanitation is different, our risk of disease is different and so those all play into the evaluation of whether this is worthwhile of taking a risk for a vaccine or not.’ During the interview, Milhoan referred to school vaccine requirements as ‘authoritarian’ but rejected the label of ‘anti-vaxxer.’ Brinda Adhikari, one of the podcast co-hosts, noted many people consider both the MMR and polio vaccines as safe, particularly because of their significant ‘proven’ history in helping to lower the rates of these diseases. Milhoan pushed back on this characterization. ‘I think that “proven” might be a little bit harsh, a little bit stronger, for what it’s done because of the pre-vaccine decrease in incidence of disease, but I understand what you’re saying,’ he said…
“‘Remember, we’re just an advisory panel. We can’t make any declarations. We can tell you what we believe the evidence shows and we try to do that as transparently and honestly as the data supports and present data,’ Milhoan added. ‘But it’s been very important to us, members of the committee, that what we are doing is returning individual autonomy to the first order, not public health, but individual autonomy to the first order.’ His comments come the same week that the U.S. hit 12 months of consistent domestic transmission of measles, potentially meaning the U.S. will lose its status as a country where the disease was eliminated… When [co-host Tom] Johnson noted that as ACIP chair, Milhoan would be asked to review a significant amount of data when carrying out his duties, much of which has been built on long-established science, Milhoan dismissed this as ‘not science.’ ‘Science is what I observe,’ Milhoan said. ‘And is there a confirmation bias in what is established science?’”
If you take the time to listen to the interview, make sure to read the linked article afterwards to see how inaccurately Choi portrays Milhoan’s comments, and how many important things he chose to not include. Also see this.
January 23 – The killjoys over at Health Digest publish an article titled, “RFK Jr.’s Bizarre ‘Cake’ For 72nd Birthday Highlights The Drawbacks Of His Extreme Diet” – nearly a week after his birthday! Author Amanda Ray Byerly wrote in part, “It’s no secret that United States Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. adheres to a strict diet… Alas, it appears that the protein aficionado affords himself very little wiggle room when it comes to eating clean – even on his birthday. On January 17, 2026, the federal agency took to their official Instagram and Twitter accounts to wish Kennedy a happy 72nd birthday, albeit with a notably bizarre choice of birthday dessert. ‘No cake, just steak,’ the post’s caption read, along with a photo of the birthday boy grinning ear to ear while posing with a sizeable steak adorned with birthday candles…
“It should be noted, however, that there are some major drawbacks when it comes to the health secretary’s extreme diet… Suffice to say, there’s actually a lot that can go wrong if you copy Kennedy’s diet, starting with what what happens to your gut when you eat too much protein, not to mention the long-term effects of depriving yourself for extended periods of time that can ultimately give way to lesser-known eating disorders, including orthorexia, a disorder that stems from an obsession with eating only healthy food… Ironically, the health secretary’s new guidance bumps up against his own, much more extreme, carnivore diet, which traditionally excludes all vegetables, fruits, grains, legumes, seeds, and nuts… For what it’s worth, Kennedy has refuted the notion that he wants Americans to mimic his own lifestyle choices.” It’s worth more than you know, Amanda, so thanks for pointing it out…
Not going to lie, “sizeable” is definitely an accurate way to describe that steak…
January 24 – In this month’s edition of Death Cult Runs Wild In Canada, we have the story of “Mrs B,” a Canadian woman who was in her 80s when she was euthanized against her will back in 2024… According to an article published at The Mirror, the woman “was euthanized ‘against her will’ just one day after expressing she no longer wished to proceed with assisted dying, as her husband had become overwhelmed by the demands of her care. [Mrs B] had previously undergone coronary artery bypass graft surgery, which resulted in multiple complications including respiratory failure that required hospital-based specialist treatment and additional surgical procedures. As her condition worsened, Mrs B made the choice to discontinue further medical intervention and opt for palliative care instead. Arrangements were made to provide support for both her and her family, and she was discharged to her home where her husband took on her care. It was then that she reportedly informed her relatives of her desire to access Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD), a Canadian legal provision that permits qualifying patients to request professional assistance in ending their lives, either through clinician-administered medication or a self-administered prescription…
“While patients typically face a waiting period of several weeks, providers can expedite the process to the same day if they determine the situation is medically urgent. An Ontario Chief Coroner’s report examining MAiD procedures raised alarm that protective measures were being undermined, resulting in deaths that warrant scrutiny, with Mrs B’s case serving as a key example. Despite the assistance of a palliative care team, including nurses, Mrs. B’s husband reportedly struggled with the level of care she needed. The report detailed that Mrs. B ‘reportedly expressed her desire for MAiD to her family,’ leading to her spouse contacting a referral service on her behalf that same day… The following day, she met with a MAiD practitioner who evaluated her eligibility. However, according to the report, ‘she reportedly told the MAiD assessor that she wanted to withdraw her request, citing personal and religious values and beliefs…’
“The next day, Mrs. B was urgently taken to the emergency department of her local hospital where she was deemed stable, but ‘her spouse was noted to be experiencing caregiver burnout.’ Her palliative care doctor submitted a referral for in-patient palliative care or hospice care due to her husband’s burnout, but the request was rejected ‘for not meeting hospice criteria for end-of-life.’ On the same day, her spouse requested an expedited second MAiD evaluation, and another assessor conducted the review that evening, determining Mrs B qualified for MAiD. When the initial assessor learned of this development, they voiced strong objections and raised red flags… The first practitioner sought to visit Mrs B the following day for a fresh evaluation, but the MAiD provider rejected this request ‘due to their clinical opinion that the clinical circumstances necessitated an urgent provision.’ A third assessor was then enlisted to perform a ‘virtual assessment’ and concurred with the second assessor’s conclusion that Mrs B met MAiD eligibility criteria… Mrs B received euthanasia that same evening.” Mrs B’s case report starts on page 22 of the linked coroner’s report. Also see this.
January 29 – Lawyer Lisa reports at her Substack that a representative in the Arizona state government has introduced a bill in the Arizona legislature which would designate the mRNA COVID “vaccines” as biological weapons of mass destruction. Lisa wrote in part, “[t]he bill is part of a multi state effort to stop the distribution of mRNA biological and technological weapons of mass destruction targeting American citizens. The proposed historic legislation is unique as it recognizes that mRNA injections and products are already illegal according to existing state biological weapon, weapon of mass destruction, or terrorism laws. The bill also creates a criminal and civil liability for non enforcement.” Update (2/5/26): Nic Hulscher reports, “Tennessee State Senator Janice Bowling has just filed Senate Bill 1949, the ‘mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act,’ prohibiting the manufacture, acquisition, possession, or distribution of mRNA injections and products – punishable as a Class B felony under Tennessee’s weapons of mass destruction statute.”
January 30 – The Department of Justice releases 3.5 million documents related to the now-deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Included in the massive data dump is an email Epstein wrote to himself about an apparent falling out with billionaire depopulation enthusiast Bill Gates. In the unsent message, Epstein claimed Gates wanted antibiotics he could give to his wife without her knowledge because of an STD he contracted and subsequently spread to her… Gates, of course, denied the allegation and claimed the email was “false,” while also claiming “[he] never went to the island. [He] never met any women.” When Bill’s ex-wife and fellow depopulation enthusiast Melinda French Gates was asked about the new details regarding her ex-husband’s relationship with Epstein, she said “they need to answer to those things, not me.”
