July 1 – A compendium study is published on Zenodo titled, “COVID-19 mRNA ‘vaccine’ harms research collection.” Utilizing over 700 peer-reviewed studies, the authors document the now well-known, yet oft-ignored biological risks associated with mRNA injections including the toxicity and persistence of the spike proteins, inflammation associated with lipid nanoparticles, spike protein biodistribution, and immune system imprinting. The study is 180 pages, so I won’t even bother to summarize it. Just let it be known that a giant body of evidence exists showing how harmful the mRNA “vaccines” really are, and now it’s all in one place.
July 6 – Doctors Peter McCullough, Paul Alexander, William Makis, Harvey Risch, Nic Hulscher and others publish a preprint study at Zenodo titled, “A Systemic Review of Autopsy Findings in Deaths After COVID-19 Vaccination.” The study, which had been censored by The Lancet before being reuploaded and made available again today, “included 44 papers that contained 325 autopsy cases and one necropsy case. Three physicians independently reviewed all deaths and determined whether COVID-19 vaccination was the direct cause or contributed significantly to death… The most implicated organ system in COVID-19 vaccine-associated death was the cardiovascular system (53%), followed by the hematological system (17%), the respiratory system (8%), and multiple organ systems (7%). Three or more organ systems were affected in 21 cases. The mean time from vaccination to death was 14.3 days. Most deaths occurred within a week from last vaccine administration. A total of 240 deaths (73.9%) were independently adjudicated as directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination… The consistency seen among cases in this review with known COVID-19 vaccine adverse events, their mechanisms, and related excess death, coupled with autopsy confirmation and physician-led death adjudication, suggests there is a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death in most cases.”
July 9 – A study is published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology titled, “Immune and hematological responses to the third dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine: a six-month longitudinal study.” Researchers looked at 68 young healthy adults (20-30 years old) after they received their third dose of the Pfizer “vaccine” and discovered several serious issues. In just 48 hours after being jabbed, the study participants’ D-dimer levels more than doubled (the test looks for evidence of blood clots), as did their hs-CRP and CRP levels (both of these tests measure inflammation in the body). In addition to these clear signs of inflammation, the participants also experienced immune system suppression with significant drops in their lymphocyte counts and interferon-gamma (a cytokine) level. Why would any young healthy person take this garbage to (supposedly) prevent a cold from becoming a really bad cold? Also see this.
July 14 – A study is published in Ophthalmic Epidemiology titled, “Evaluation of the Effects of mRNA-COVID 19 Vaccines on Corneal Endothelium.” Researchers discovered serious damage to the eye’s corneal endothelium occurred in just 75 days following the second dose of Pfizer’s COVID “vaccine.” Looking at the eyes of 64 healthy individuals before being vaccinated, and then 75 days after the second dose, the biggest change occurred in regard to Endothelial Cell Density, which on average reduced by 8.4%. The corneal endothelium is very important as it keeps the cornea hydrated and transparent, and these cells do not regenerate once they are damaged or destroyed. Also see this.
July 16 – A study is published at Preprints.org titled, “SARS-CoV-2 Semi-Quantitative Total Antibody Correlates with Symptoms of Long COVID in Both Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Subjects.” Researchers sought to “investigate the association between post-vaccination syndrome and Long COVID, [so they] evaluated SARS-CoV-2 Semi-Quant Spike Ab [antibodies] in 100 consecutive patients with symptoms of Long COVID.” The participants consisted of 81 patients with post-vaccine syndrome, and 19 unvaxxed patients with long-COVID symptoms. “SARS-CoV-2 Semi-Quant Spike Ab in the vaccinated cohort showed an average result of 11356.86, while SARS-CoV-2 Semi-Quant Spike Ab in the unvaccinated cohort showed an average result of 1631.94” – a considerable difference.
Defining Long-COVID as “an infection-associated chronic condition that occurs after SARS-CoV-2 infection and is present for at least 3 months as a continuous, relapsing and remitting, or progressive disease state that affects one or more organ systems,” the researchers put forth a couple of possible explanations as to why this occurs, writing, “One hypothesis for Long COVID is that increased levels of circulating spike protein with deposition, either isolated or with immune complex deposition, into various organ systems causes two things. The first is associated problems related to deposition into organ systems, including pericarditis, myocarditis, headaches… and Bell’s palsy to name a few. Another hypothesis is that increasing levels of circulating spike protein also causes immune response with production of antibodies. This is typically an appropriate immune response. The potential problem lies in long-term increased levels of circulation with chronic antibody production, thereby leading to immune fatigue, including pneumococcal antibody deficiencies.”
In regard to post-vaccination syndrome, the researchers wrote, “[this] syndrome could cause long term symptoms by several mechanisms. Vaccine components could lead to chronic inflammation through stimulation of innate immune response via pattern recognition receptors by mRNA, adenoviral vectors, and or nanoparticles. This vaccine induced immune response could trigger autoreactive lymphocytes. Spike protein expression following vaccination circulates in the plasma within one day following vaccination and host interaction with full-length Spike protein, subunits, or peptide fragments could result in prolonged symptoms. [The spike protein’s] potential ability to cross the blood-brain barrier could result in neural or cognitive symptoms, based on biodistribution models of mRNA-LNP. Another concern is that with chronic increased circulating levels of Spike protein with immune response, in addition to developing immune fatigue, the virus may ultimately become an oncogenic virus with alterations in response of neutrophils, memory cells, T cells and antibodies.”
As far as dealing with these prolonged symptoms, researchers suggested several possible treatments including the use of nattokinase, bromelain and/or curcumin, as well as the use of nicotine as it “binds to nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), which are distributed throughout the body, including the respiratory tract, which share similarities with ACE2 receptors, which SARS-CoV-2 uses to enter cells of the host.” How much different would life be in 2025 if The Twerp and his merry band of psychotic mad scientists had never cooked up COVID in the first place?
July 19 – A study is published in the International Dental Journal titled, “National Pharmacovigilance Assessment of Oral Adverse Events Following COVID-19 Vaccination in Germany (2020-2023).” Researchers analyzed 975K adverse event reports submitted to the Federal Ministry of Health between December 2020 and December 2023 and found 21 oral health issues linked to the COVID “vaccine.” These conditions, which were reported at a much higher rate than expected in both Germany and the US include loss of taste (18x more likely), complete loss of taste (16x more likely), numb teeth (10x more likely), extreme tooth sensitivity (9x more likely), canker sores (4.5x more likely – 5.9x in children), numb mouth (8x more likely), swelling around the mouth (3.7x more likely) and swollen tongue (3x more), among others.
To account for this, the authors wrote, “Bahri et al proposed several alternative hypotheses to explain postvaccination anosmia [loss of smell] and ageusia [loss of taste] instead of attributing them to the nocebo effect. One hypothesis suggests that partial demyelination [damage to the coating that protects nerve fibers] of taste-related neural pathways may impair gustatory function [this basically means identifying tastes], similar to its proposed role in anosmia. Another hypothesis attributes gustatory dysfunction to vaccine-induced inflammation in the oral neuroepithelium [lining around taste buds], leading to transient sensory impairment. In addition, direct interaction between vaccine-induced spike proteins and taste receptors or immune-mediated damage to gustatory cells has been suggested as a potential mechanism.” They also suggested the possibility of “increased reporting of AEs [adverse events] when a medical intervention, such as a vaccine or drug, gains heightened public attention, media coverage, or regulatory scrutiny, leading to a disproportionate perception of its risk.” Hat tip to Nic Hulscher.
July 25 – A study is published at Preprints.org titled, “Synthetic mRNA Vaccines and Transcriptomic Dysregulation: Evidence from New-Onset Adverse Events and Cancers Post-Vaccination.” According to Nic Hulscher, one of the doctors involved with the study, researchers used “high-resolution RNA sequencing of blood samples and differential gene expression analysis [and] found that COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ severely disrupted the expression of thousands of genes – inducing mitochondrial failure, immune system reprogramming, and oncogenic activation that persisted for months to years after injection… Both vaccine injured groups showed massive gene dysregulation compared to healthy controls – hundreds of genes up- or down-regulated, especially in pathways tied to: mitochondrial dysfunction, protein folding and degradation stress (proteasome pathways), ribosomal overload and nonsense-mediated decay (NMD), chronic systemic inflammation, oncogenic activation (MYC) and tumor suppressor suppression…
To our knowledge, this is the first study to show long-term genetic disruption in individuals harmed by the COVID-19 mRNA injections. These findings strongly suggest: mRNA vaccines can induce gene expression profiles consistent with tumor formation and chronic disease, mRNA-vaccinated individuals may be at heightened risk of cancer, immune dysfunction, and inflammatory disorders, the synthetic mRNA and long-lasting spike protein appear to create sustained cellular stress that disrupts normal genetic regulation, [and] signatures suggest potential reverse transcription of vaccine mRNA and persistence of plasmid DNA – raising concern for long-term transcriptional interference or possible genomic integration.” Update (8/2/25): Dr. John Catanzaro, CEO of Neo7Bioscience and senior author of this study, joins Nic Hulscher on his Focal Points podcast to discuss the science behind mRNA-induced genetic disruption.
Update (9/11/25): Preprints.org withdraws and removes the study from their website without any explanation other than it was done “at the request of Advisory Board in line with the withdrawal policy (https://www.preprints.org/instructions-for-authors#withdrawal-policy).” According to Nic Hulscher, “The retraction of our preprint wasn’t about ethics. This was about silencing a study that revealed mRNA ‘vaccines’ induce transcriptomic chaos across thousands of genes. When one of the world’s most-read preprints can be erased at the whim of the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex, open science is dead. If preprints can be censored, the façade of ‘scientific debate’ has collapsed into a regime of control. The study is not going away. As it undergoes peer-review at a reputable journal, you can still access it on ResearchGate. We will continue to fight for scientific truth, no matter the cost.”
July 25 – The London Telegraph reports the “Covid vaccines saved far fewer lives than first thought, a major new analysis has concluded… In 2024, the World Health Organisation (WHO) claimed that jabs prevented the deaths of 14.4 million globally in the first year alone, with some estimates putting the figure closer to 20 million. However, new modelling by Stanford University and Italian researchers suggests that while the vaccine did undoubtedly save lives, the true figure is ‘substantially more conservative’ and closer to 2.5 million worldwide over the course of the entire pandemic… Overall 5,400 people needed to be vaccinated to save one life but in the under-30s this figure rose to 100,000 jabs.. Since 2021, more than 13 billion Covid-19 vaccine doses have been administered. But there have been mounting concerns that vaccines could be harmful for some people, particularly the young, and that the risk was not worth the benefit for a population at little risk from Covid… The team believes earlier modelling may have used overly pessimistic infection fatality rates and overly optimistic vaccine effectiveness, while failing to consider how quickly protection waned.” While this admission is definitely a step in the right direction – especially since it’s coming from a well-known and respected institution like Stanford – it does not account for other studies that estimate deaths in the tens of millions due to government treatment protocols and deadly “vaccines.” Also check out this breakdown of the study to understand why it’s “turtles all the way down.”
August 7 – A study is published in Scientific Reports titled, “Top 10 drugs most frequently associated with adverse events of myocarditis and pericarditis.” Using over 35M medical records from over 140 countries (1968-2024), researchers found 76% (26,670) of total myocarditis cases (35,017) were linked to the COVID “vaccine,” while 88% (22,001) of total pericarditis cases (24,959) were linked to the jab. Researchers also noticed a surge of these cases beginning in 2021, right after the “safe and effective” clot shot hit the market. Sadly, the 0-17 age group was statistically overrepresented for both conditions, despite the fact that COVID cases in children and teens are overwhelmingly mild or moderate. TrialSiteNews gave the study an overall grade of 78% and cited several limitations, writing, “[t]he dataset depends on spontaneous reporting, vulnerable to underreporting, overreporting, and diagnostic uncertainty. Media attention heightened clinical vigilance, and massive vaccine rollout campaigns may have amplified report volumes – a phenomenon known as stimulated reporting. No incidence rates can be derived, and causality cannot be confirmed by these associations alone.”
August 9 – A study is published in Nature’s Communications Medicine titled, “Association of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination status with risk of influenza-like illness and loss of workdays in healthcare workers.” To analyze the health outcomes of 1,745 Swiss healthcare workers, researchers collected weekly data on symptoms and sick days taken “during a period of high SARS-CoV-2 community transmission (November 2023 to May 2024)” and found what has been shown in seven other studies – “more SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations are associated with a higher risk of influenza-like respiratory illness and workdays lost. For influenza-like respiratory illness, the association is stronger with a more recent timing of the vaccination rather than the number of vaccinations, which suggests that the effect wanes over time.” To be specific, those who received three jabs had a 56% higher chance of contracting an influenza-like illness compared to the unvaccinated, while those who took four had a 70% higher chance. The “plain language summary” section of the study reads in part, “it is still unclear whether annual COVID booster vaccines are necessary for low-risk populations such as healthcare workers. In this study, 1745 healthcare workers in Switzerland were followed over several months to see how their vaccination status affected their chances of getting flu-like illnesses and missing work. The study found that those who recently received a COVID-19 booster were more likely to report symptoms and take sick leave… These findings suggest that COVID-19 boosters may not offer clear short-term benefits in a post-pandemic setting, and may even increase short-term illness risk. This raises questions about the best use of booster vaccines moving forward.”
Image taken from the linked study.
August 14 – A study is published at Preprints.org titled, “Compound Adverse Effects of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination and Coronavirus Infection: A Convergence of Extensive Spike Protein Harms to the Human Body.” In the paper, researchers put forth a new theory about how COVID clot shot recipients have been primed for severe harm when encountering subsequent COVID infections. Referencing over 380 previously conducted studies, they came up with what they are calling the “Hybrid Harms Hypothesis.” The theory goes like this: “repeated spike antigenic exposure via mRNA vaccination may interact with either a previous or subsequent coronavirus infection due to the long-term persistence of spike protein in the body. This interaction results in an amplification of ‘spikeopathy,’ manifesting as chronic immunotoxicity, hyper and persistent inflammation, immune dysregulation, and diverse pathological sequelae, including many disease and disability events that have been associated with both the COVID-19 vaccinations and coronavirus infections. In the case of post-vaccination infections, the apparent temporal association between the diverse sequelae and the SARS-CoV-2 infection has led to systematic misclassification, attributing causality solely to the viral infection rather than considering the potential background noise of spike protein generated by previous mRNA vaccinations… We hypothesize, however, that COVID-19 was only the final phase in the etiologic chain of events, and that the preceding full course of COVID-19 mRNA vaccinations represented the initial immunotoxic insult that predisposed each individual to more severe morbidity and, ultimately, to premature death.”
Ultimately, researchers concluded in part, “interactions between COVID-19 mRNA injections and later coronavirus infections may explain the manifestation and/or persistence of serious AEs [adverse events] in previously vaccinated individuals, even after the emergence of milder Omicron variants. In many cases, the biological impact of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination may constitute a precursor event, predisposing the individual to develop the post-COVID-19 sequelae… at any time during the post-injection 3-year window… A plausible explanation for the prolonged presence of spike protein, along with the multitude of long-term ‘spikeopathies’ that have been documented in the context of the mRNA-LNP modality, is integration of the product’s genetic material into the genome of human cells. This latent integration would be a byproduct of the unintended plasmid-sourced foreign DNA, including the mammalian promoter SV40. If there were pockets of cells latently infected with this foreign genetic material, it could manifest as persistent spike protein production when those cells become active. It seems improbable that the persistence of spike protein production could be due to prolonged mRNA stability or protein retention in immune cells because of the years-long timeframe between introduction to the material and production itself.
“Most of the administration of these synthetic, modified mRNA products took place in 2021. By 2022, Omicron had become the dominant COVID-19 viral variant, with mild pathogenicity. Even the most extensively vaccinated countries experienced substantial Omicron outbreaks in 2022. Paradoxically, despite the mild pathogenicity of this variant, the waves of Omicron infection were closely followed by spikes in all-cause mortality… We present the hypothesis that the infections were superimposed on a preexisting mRNA vaccine-induced milieu of toxic spike protein, inflammatory lipid nanoparticles, and residual process-related DNA impurities… Spike proteins resulting from both the mRNA vaccination and the natural SARS-CoV-2 infection have been shown to persist for extended periods, raising parallel concerns regarding potential implications for long-term safety. Many if not most of the morbidity and mortality events attributed to COVID-19 in heavily vaccinated populations in 2022-2023 were likely due to the long-term background persistence of spike protein and other vaccine-associated components resulting from previous COVID-19 mRNA vaccinations.”
Overall, the paper is excellent and worth taking the time to read, especially sections five and six. For a breakdown of the study by one of its authors, see this.
August 26 – A study out of Japan is published in Science, Public Health Policy and the Law titled, “Regulatory and Safety Assessment of COVID-19 mRNA-LNP Genetic Vaccines in Japan: Evidence for Revocation of Approval and Market Withdrawal.” The researchers wrote in part, “[t]he genetic vaccines that received special approval for emergency were widely recommended for administration as a public health measure during the COVID-19 pandemic, with approximately 103.46 million people in Japan (79.5% of the population) receiving the genetic vaccine. Despite numerous reports of health injuries both domestically and internationally as of June 2025, the Japanese government has not conducted a nationwide health injury survey into these adverse health effects [sound familiar?]. These vaccines were approved without adequate non-clinical testing and long-term safety evaluation, and administration continued without sufficient disclosure of adverse events… It is evident that genetic vaccines that received special approval for emergency by the Japanese government lack sufficient evidence of efficacy, and their potential risks to public health cannot be overlooked. A comparison with previous cases of pharmaceutical approval revocations indicates that revoking the approval and withdrawing genetic vaccines from the market is not only reasonable but also necessary.”
In their conclusion, the researchers point out how here in the US “over 81,000 physicians, scientists, researchers, and citizens, along with 240 government officials, 17 public health and medical organizations, 2 state Republican organizations, 17 Republican county committees, and 6 scientific studies, have issued statements calling for market withdrawal of genetic vaccines. Furthermore, legislative efforts to prohibit SARS-CoV-2 genetic vaccines are underway in multiple U.S. states, including Florida, South Carolina, Tennessee, Iowa, Texas, Montana, Idaho, Washington, Kentucky, North Dakota, and Minnesota, with bill consideration and drafting beginning at various levels of government. For example, in Montana, legislation prohibiting genetic vaccine administration to humans was introduced in the state legislature in January 2025. Given these developments, the movement for market withdrawal and revocation of approval of genetic vaccines is no longer confined to a single country but is becoming an international trend. Considering the lack of transparency and inadequate information disclosure identified in the approval review process and post-marketing surveillance of genetic vaccines, continuing administration of genetic vaccines with serious safety concerns poses profound problems from scientific and ethical perspectives and constitutes an infringement upon individual autonomy and human rights.”
August 27 – A McCullough Foundation study is published in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons titled, “COVID-19 Injections: Harms and Damages, a Non-Exhaustive Conclusion.” The paper points out several interesting facts including: 1) the SARS-CoV-2 virus, as well as the clot shots promoted to reduce the virus’ effects, are products of lab manipulation, 2) the virus and the shots both violate the UN’s Biological Weapons Convention, and 3) “senior NATO military scientists rated SARS-CoV-2 as the fourth most attractive pathogen amongst 34 known or potential bioweapons.” The study also documents many of the harms caused by the mRNA injections including cardiovascular harms, a significant loss of life expectancy, a surge in rapidly-developing cancers, and immune system collapse. The paper’s conclusion reads in part, “[t]he overwhelming evidence of SARS-CoV-2’s gain-of-function origins, coupled with the catastrophic health impacts of modified mRNA COVID-19 biologics/vaccines and the unchecked expansion of next-generation mRNA biologics, paints a chilling picture of deliberate design and systemic harm… Coordinated efforts to obscure these truths, enabled by liability shields and legislative failures, have worsened a global health disaster. The surge in autoimmune diseases, aggressive cancers, pregnancy losses, cardiovascular fatalities, societal fragmentation, and the looming risks of advanced mRNA platforms demand an immediate halt to mRNA vaccine and biologic use, comprehensive investigations into the motives behind this unprecedented violation of public trust, and robust measures to restore safe therapeutics and ethical public health practices. Humanity deserves accountability, transparency, and a resolute commitment to preventing such engineered calamities in the future.” For a short breakdown of the study see this.
September 2 – A study is published at PubMed titled, “Azelastine Nasal Spray for Prevention of SARS-CoV-2 Infections: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.” Among the 450 participants (227 received azelastine, 223 received a placebo), most were women and most were white, and nearly all (99.1%) took at least one COVID vaccine. The group that took the azelastine did so three times per day for 56 days. The study, which was conducted in Germany in 2023, showed a significant reduction in PCR-confirmed COVID infections for the group that took the drug (21 of 227/9.25% vs. 49 of 223/22%).
September 6 – A study is published in the journal Autoimmunity titled, “Quantification of residual plasmid DNA and SV40 promoter-enhancer sequences in Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada.” After analyzing the contents of 32 vials from 16 unique vaccine lots (Pfizer and Moderna), researchers found “the presence of billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose in the modRNA COVID-19 products tested… all products tested exceeded the guidelines for residual DNA set by the FDA and WHO of 10ng/dose by 36-627-fold.” Three of the Pfizer vials also “exceeded the regulatory limit [of 10ng] for the SV40 promoter-enhancer,” a DNA virus linked to cancer in humans and animals. Also see this and this.
September 8 – The Independent Medical Alliance (IMA) reports on a new study published in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons titled, “COVID-19 Injections: Harms and Damages, a Non-Exhaustive Conclusion.” The study was authored by IMA Chief Scientific Officer Paul Marik, along with almost a dozen other doctors, most of whom have been discussed at various points in this timeline. “…the paper lays out extensive, interdisciplinary evidence that both the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines bear hallmarks of deliberate design – and that their global rollout has resulted in catastrophic health outcomes. Drawing on government databases, autopsy reports, molecular biology, and clinical data from real-world patients, the authors argue that these harms are not rare, isolated incidents – but part of a systematic pattern of injury, immune dysfunction, and coverup… The study alleges that both the virus and the vaccines show signs of lab-based manipulation and that the outcomes – from myocarditis and miscarriages to cancer and cognitive decline – are consistent, wide-ranging, and too severe to ignore.” The study discusses a host of disturbing issues connected to the COVID “vaccines” including signs of deliberate engineering, the alarming increase of serious diagnoses contained within the DOD’s Defense Medical Epidemiology Database, immune system breakdown and dysfunction, cardiovascular damage associated with spike proteins, the rise in cancer, genetic disruption, harm to fetuses and pregnancy loss, psychological stress and the rise of institutional distrust. The study is a great one-stop shop to familiarize oneself with all of the negative impacts these “safe and effective” jabs have had on unsuspecting people throughout the world.
September 15 – A study is published at Zenodo titled, “Genomic Integration and Molecular Dysregulation in Aggressive Stage IV Bladder Cancer Following COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination.” The study provides “the first documented evidence of genomic integration of mRNA vaccine-derived genetic material in a human subject, documenting a temporal association between COVID-19 mRNA vaccination and aggressive malignancy, reproducible multi-omic evidence of oncogenic signaling, and a non–safe harbor host–vector integration event. While causality cannot be established from a single case, the convergence of (i) close temporal proximity to vaccination, (ii) genomic integration of a vaccine plasmid–derived spike gene fragment, and (iii) consistent transcriptomic and proteomic instability across biospecimens represents a highly unusual and biologically plausible pattern…” According to Nic Hulscher, one of the study’s authors, “The probability of a random 20-base sequence perfectly matching a predefined target is ~1 in a trillion, [making an] accidental artifact virtually impossible.”
Image taken from the linked study.
September 15 – A study is published in the Journal of Applied Biology and Pharmaceutical Technology titled, “A Step-by-Step Evaluation of the Claim That COVID-19 Vaccines Saved Millions of Lives.” According to the authors, flawed research methodologies, the misrepresentation of efficacy studies by researchers and public health officials to show nonexistent benefits, and the systematic suppression of COVID vaccine critics all contributed to the false belief that the COVID clot shot saved “millions of lives.” The biggest lie underpinning all of it was the lie that the shot “stopped the spread.” By using this false data point, models could then show how every jab administered ended up preventing a new infection, hospitalization and/or death. Unfortunately, far too many Americans still believe this, as well as the manufactured narrative that the experimental mRNA COVID jabs have done more good than harm when the opposite is true.
September 17 – A preprint study is published at Zenodo (download available here) titled, “COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination: Implications for the Central Nervous System.” Using VAERS data from January 1990 through November 2024, researchers compared adverse brain and spinal cord event data reported after COVID vaccination to all other vaccinations combined. According to Nic Hulscher, one of the researchers involved in the study, they found “63 serious safety signals involving the brain and nervous system, ranging from meningitis and encephalitis to brain abscesses, herpesvirus reactivations, demyelinating syndromes, and even prion diseases – each breaching CDC/FDA thresholds that are supposed to trigger immediate safety investigations… lipid nanoparticles deliver mRNA into brain blood vessels, where spike protein is produced and drives vascular inflammation. This damages the blood-brain barrier (BBB), the brain’s protective shield, and allows pathogens and latent viruses to penetrate, bacteria to seed abscesses, and immune responses to misfire against neural tissue. Spike protein itself can also cross into the brain, where it disrupts neurons and glial cells and promotes abnormal protein misfolding – a prion-like process resembling Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and ‘mad cow disease.’ Together, these effects explain why COVID-19 vaccination is associated with such a broad spectrum of severe neurological injuries.” Ultimately, the authors concluded these safety signals “support an immediate global ban on the COVID-19 vaccination program.”
September 26 – A study is published in the Biomarker Research journal titled, “1-year risks of cancers associated with COVID-19 vaccination: a large population-based cohort study in South Korea.” Seeking to “estimate the cumulative incidences and subsequent risks of overall cancers 1 year after COVID-19 vaccination,” researchers looked at medical data (2021-2023) from nearly 8.5 million citizens contained in the Korean National Health Insurance database. They found the hazard ratios of thyroid, gastric, colorectal, lung, breast and prostate cancers “significantly increased at 1 year post-vaccination” regardless of age, sex or the type of COVID vaccine administered (the increased risk ranged from 20-69%, respectively). Also see this.
September 30 – A study is published in The Lancet titled, “Long COVID associated with SARS-CoV-2 reinfection among children and adolescents in the omicron era (RECOVER-EHR): a retrospective cohort study.” Using the records of 465K who were diagnosed with COVID in 2022 and 2023, researchers found children who received the COVID “vaccine” were more than twice as likely to be diagnosed with abnormal liver enzymes up to six months after infection compared to unvaxxed kids (5/1000 versus 2/1000). Vaccinated kids were also more likely to experience chest pain, fatigue, muscle pain and kidney injuries. There was also a slight uptick in the rate of heart arrhythmias. Regardless, the results were spun into a talking point to promote COVID vaccination among children, but as Alex Berenson points out, the results indicate the exact opposite. Berenson wrote in part, “the data the researchers reported shows vaccinated kids were about 50 percent more likely to be diagnosed with long Covid after infection than unvaccinated kids. And the gap between vaccinated and unvaccinated actually worsened after a second infection… The findings count even if they’re buried in the appendix [see pages 38-41]. Arguably even more importantly, the study reveals, yet again, that the scientific establishment simply will NOT follow up on signals of potential mRNA risk. The study’s researchers parsed their data in countless ways, but they buried the vaccinated and unvaccinated data and failed to publish any direct analysis of vaccinated and unvaccinated kids. They could easily have chosen to look directly at whether the mRNAs seemed to be linked to a higher risk of serious conditions, but they didn’t.” They never do…